Spatial-decomposition analysis of electrical conductivity in concentrated electrolyte solution

2014 ◽  
Vol 141 (4) ◽  
pp. 044126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai-Min Tu ◽  
Ryosuke Ishizuka ◽  
Nobuyuki Matubayasi
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Conductivity ◽  
Electrolyte Solution ◽  
Decomposition Analysis ◽  
Spatial Decomposition

Spatial-decomposition analysis of electrical conductivity in ionic liquid

2014 ◽  
Vol 141 (24) ◽  
pp. 244507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai-Min Tu ◽  
Ryosuke Ishizuka ◽  
Nobuyuki Matubayasi
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Conductivity ◽  
Ionic Liquid ◽  
Decomposition Analysis ◽  
Spatial Decomposition

Expenditure Inequality in Indonesia, 2008-2010: A Spatial Decomposition Analysis and the Role of Education

2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 389-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitsuhiro Hayashi ◽  
Mitsuhiko Kataoka ◽  
Takahiro Akita
Keyword(s):  
Decomposition Analysis ◽  
Spatial Decomposition

Spatial-Decomposition Analysis of Energetics of Ionic Hydration

2016 ◽  
Vol 120 (8) ◽  
pp. 1813-1821 ◽  
Author(s):  
George Mogami ◽  
Makoto Suzuki ◽  
Nobuyuki Matubayasi
Keyword(s):  
Decomposition Analysis ◽  
Spatial Decomposition ◽  
Ionic Hydration

Spatial-decomposition analysis of viscosity with application to Lennard-Jones fluid

2018 ◽  
Vol 148 (9) ◽  
pp. 094501 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai-Min Tu ◽  
Kang Kim ◽  
Nobuyuki Matubayasi
Keyword(s):  
Decomposition Analysis ◽  
Spatial Decomposition ◽  
Lennard Jones

Spatial decomposition analysis of NO2 and PM2.5 air pollution in the United States

2020 ◽  
Vol 241 ◽  
pp. 117470 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuzhou Wang ◽  
Matthew J. Bechle ◽  
Sun-Young Kim ◽  
Peter J. Adams ◽  
Spyros N. Pandis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Air Pollution ◽  
Decomposition Analysis ◽  
The United States ◽  
Spatial Decomposition

scholarly journals STUDIES ON PERMEABILITY OF MEMBRANES

1929 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 473-485 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arda A. Green ◽  
A. A. Weech ◽  
L. Michaelis
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Conductivity ◽  
Electrolyte Solution ◽  
Maximum Level ◽  
Conductivity Data ◽  
Concentrated Solutions ◽  
Membrane Pores ◽  
Electrolyte Content ◽  
Hydrated Ions ◽  
Two Factors ◽  
The Difference

Two methods of measuring the electrical conductivity of the dried collodion membrane in contact with an electrolyte solution are described and the results of such measurements with different electrolytes in different ranges of concentration recorded. Some of the difficulties encountered in making these measurements are outlined. Of special interest was the fact that each membrane with each electrolyte showed a maximum level of resistance at a certain point in the dilution scale, a level which was not surpassed by further dilution. It is believed that this level was fixed by the collodion itself rather than by the contiguous electrolyte solution. Its existence limited the results available for reasonable interpretation. In relatively concentrated solutions the conductivity was shown to be approximately proportional to the concentration. With different electrolytes in the same concentration it was shown that the conductivities varied much more than in simple solutions without a membrane and that they fell in the order HCl > KCl > NaCl > LiCl. A method was described whereby the electrolyte content of a membrane in contact with different chloride solutions could be determined. It was shown that a membrane saturated with either 0.5 N HCl or 0.5 N KCl had practically the same total electrolyte content whereas the same membrane in contact with 0.5 N LiCl contained only half the quantity. These results were used in interpreting the conductivity data, the evidence presented strongly suggesting that two factors are operative in causing the widely divergent conductivities recorded with different electrolytes. The first factor depended on the quantity of electrolyte which can enter the membrane pores, a quantity dependent on the size of the pores and the volume of the larger of the two hydrated ions of the electrolyte. This factor was the chief one in determining the difference in conductivity between KCl and LiCl. The second factor was concerned with differences in the mobility of the various cations within the membrane brought about by friction between the moving ions and the pore walls. With KCl and HCl the quantity of electrolytes entering the membrane was in each case the same, being determined by the size of the larger Cl- ion. The widely different conductivity values were explained as due to the changes in the mobility of the two cations within the membrane pores.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document