Geometrical investigation of the kinetic evolution of the magnetic field in a periodic flux rope

2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (8) ◽  
pp. 082501 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. L. Restante ◽  
S. Markidis ◽  
G. Lapenta ◽  
T. Intrator
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Flux Rope ◽  
The Magnetic Field ◽  
Geometrical Investigation

Connecting a Star’s Convection Zone with its Corona

1995 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 180-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. J. Galloway ◽  
C. A. Jones
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Convection Zone ◽  
Flux Rope ◽  
Field System ◽  
Stellar Convection ◽  
Coronal Activity ◽  
Flux Concentration ◽  
Global Understanding ◽  
The Magnetic Field

AbstractThis paper discusses problems which have as their uniting theme the need to understand the coupling between a stellar convection zone and a magnetically dominated corona above it. Interest is concentrated on how the convection drives the atmosphere above, loading it with the currents that give rise to flares and other forms of coronal activity. The role of boundary conditions appears to be crucial, suggesting that a global understanding of the magnetic field system is necessary to explain what is observed in the corona. Calculations are presented which suggest that currents flowing up a flux rope return not in the immediate vicinity of the rope but rather in an alternative flux concentration located some distance away.

scholarly journals Non-damping oscillations at flaring loops

2018 ◽  
Vol 617 ◽  
pp. A86 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Li ◽  
D. Yuan ◽  
Y. N. Su ◽  
Q. M. Zhang ◽  
W. Su ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Line Width ◽  
Line Emission ◽  
Flux Rope ◽  
Doppler Velocity ◽  
Narrow Slit ◽  
Plasma Properties ◽  
Spectral Window ◽  
Peak Intensity ◽  
The Magnetic Field

Context. Quasi-periodic oscillations are usually detected as spatial displacements of coronal loops in imaging observations or as periodic shifts of line properties (i.e., Doppler velocity, line width and intensity) in spectroscopic observations. They are often applied for remote diagnostics of magnetic fields and plasma properties on the Sun. Aims. We combine the imaging and spectroscopic measurements of available space missions, and investigate the properties of non-damping oscillations at flaring loops. Methods. We used the Interface Region Imaging Spectrograph (IRIS) to measure the spectrum over a narrow slit. The double-component Gaussian fitting method was used to extract the line profile of Fe XXI 1354.08 Å at the “O I” spectral window. The quasi-periodicity of loop oscillations were identified in the Fourier and wavelet spectra. Results. A periodicity at about 40 s is detected in the line properties of Fe XXI 1354.08 Å, hard X-ray emissions in GOES 1−8 Å derivative, and Fermi 26−50 keV. The Doppler velocity and line width oscillate in phase, while a phase shift of about π/2 is detected between the Doppler velocity and peak intensity. The amplitudes of Doppler velocity and line width oscillation are about 2.2 km s−1 and 1.9 km s−1, respectively, while peak intensity oscillates with amplitude at about 3.6% of the background emission. Meanwhile, a quasi-period of about 155 s is identified in the Doppler velocity and peak intensity of the Fe XXI 1354.08 Å line emission, and AIA 131 Å intensity. Conclusions. The oscillations at about 40 s are not damped significantly during the observation; this might be linked to the global kink modes of flaring loops. The periodicity at about 155 s is most likely a signature of recurring downflows after chromospheric evaporation along flaring loops. The magnetic field strengths of the flaring loops are estimated to be about 120−170 G using the magnetohydrodynamic seismology diagnostics, which are consistent with the magnetic field modeling results using the flux rope insertion method.

A New Model to Describe the Magnetic Structure of CMEs

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nada Al-Haddad ◽  
Noé Lugaz
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Flux Rope ◽  
Challenging Problem ◽  
New Paradigm ◽  
Field Orientation ◽  
Magnetic Field Orientation ◽  
The Past ◽  
Current Paradigm ◽  
The Magnetic Field

<p>The structure of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) has been the center of numerous studies over the past few decades. Defining the magnetic field orientation locally and globally has proven to be a challenging problem, due to the limited nature of observations that we have, as well as our reliance on the current paradigm of highly-twisted flux ropes. Studies suggest that not all CMEs measured <em>in situ </em>fit within the simple twisted and well-organized flux rope topology. Additionally, many of the events that can be well fitted by existing static flux rope models, do not have as simple a structure as that assumed by the models. This is clear from remote observations and multi-spacecraft measurements. With the wealth of data that we have today, as well as the affluence of research and analysis performed over the last 40 years, it is dues time to present an alternative paradigm, that better represents those data. In this work, we discuss this new paradigm and the literature leading to it. </p>

The self-similar, non-linear evolution of rotating magnetic flux ropes

1995 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 815-827 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. J. Farrugia ◽  
V. A Osherovich ◽  
L. F. Burlaga
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Magnetic Flux ◽  
Small Amplitude ◽  
Symmetry Axis ◽  
Flux Rope ◽  
Magnetic Clouds ◽  
Linear Evolution ◽  
Multiplicative Factor ◽  
Self Similar ◽  
The Magnetic Field

Abstract. We study, in the ideal MHD approximation, the non-linear evolution of cylindrical magnetic flux tubes differentially rotating about their symmetry axis. Our force balance consists of inertial terms, which include the centrifugal force, the gradient of the axial magnetic pressure, the magnetic pinch force and the gradient of the gas pressure. We employ the "separable" class of self-similar magnetic fields, defined recently. Taking the gas to be a polytrope, we reduce the problem to a single, ordinary differential equation for the evolution function. In general, two regimes of evolution are possible; expansion and oscillation. We investigate the specific effect rotation has on these two modes of evolution. We focus on critical values of the flux rope parameters and show that rotation can suppress the oscillatory mode. We estimate the critical value of the angular velocity Ωcrit, above which the magnetic flux rope always expands, regardless of the value of the initial energy. Studying small-amplitude oscillations of the rope, we find that torsional oscillations are superimposed on the rotation and that they have a frequency equal to that of the radial oscillations. By setting the axial component of the magnetic field to zero, we study small-amplitude oscillations of a rigidly rotating pinch. We find that the frequency of oscillation ω is inversely proportional to the angular velocity of rotation Ω; the product ωΩbeing proportional to the inverse square of the Alfvén time. The period of large-amplitude oscillations of a rotating flux rope of low beta increases exponentially with the energy of the equivalent 1D oscillator. With respect to large-amplitude oscillations of a non-rotating flux rope, the only change brought about by rotation is to introduce a multiplicative factor greater than unity, which further increases the period. This multiplicative factor depends on the ratio of the azimuthal speed to the Alfvén speed. Finally, considering interplanetary magnetic clouds as cylindrical flux ropes, we inquire whether they rotate. We find that at 1 AU only a minority do. We discuss data on two magnetic clouds where we interpret the presence in each of vortical plasma motion about the symmetry axis as a sign of rotation. Our estimates for the angular velocities suggest that the parameters of the two magnetic clouds are below critical values. The two clouds differ in many respects (such as age, bulk flow speed, size, handedness of the magnetic field, etc.), and we find that their rotational parameters reflect some of these differences, particularly the difference in age. In both clouds, a rough estimate of the radial electric field in the rigidly rotating core, calculated in a non-rotating frame, yields values of the order mV m–1.

scholarly journals A distinct magnetic property of the inner penumbral boundary

2020 ◽  
Vol 638 ◽  
pp. A28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Jurčák ◽  
Markus Schmassmann ◽  
Matthias Rempel ◽  
Nazaret Bello González ◽  
Rolf Schlichenmaier
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Magnetic Properties ◽  
Magnetic Property ◽  
Potential Field ◽  
Magnetic Energy ◽  
Vertical Component ◽  
Flux Rope ◽  
Field Configuration ◽  
The Magnetic Field ◽  
Upper Boundary

Context. Analyses of sunspot observations revealed a fundamental magnetic property of the umbral boundary: the invariance of the vertical component of the magnetic field. Aims. We analyse the magnetic properties of the umbra-penumbra boundary in simulated sunspots and thus assess their similarity to observed sunspots. We also aim to investigate the role of the plasma β and the ratio of kinetic to magnetic energy in simulated sunspots in the convective motions because these quantities cannot be reliably determined from observations. Methods. We used a set of non-gray simulation runs of sunspots with the MURaM code. The setups differed in terms of subsurface magnetic field structure and magnetic field boundary imposed at the top of the simulation domain. These data were used to synthesize the Stokes profiles, which were then degraded to the Hinode spectropolarimeter-like observations. Then, the data were treated like real Hinode observations of a sunspot, and magnetic properties at the umbral boundaries were determined. Results. Simulations with potential field extrapolation produce a realistic magnetic field configuration on the umbral boundaries of the sunspots. Two simulations with a potential field upper boundary, but different subsurface magnetic field structures, differ significantly in the extent of their penumbrae. Increasing the penumbra width by forcing more horizontal magnetic fields at the upper boundary results in magnetic properties that are not consistent with observations. This implies that the size of the penumbra is given by the subsurface structure of the magnetic field, that is, by the depth and inclination of the magnetopause, which is shaped by the expansion of the sunspot flux rope with height. None of the sunspot simulations is consistent with the observed properties of the magnetic field and the direction of the Evershed flow at the same time. Strong outward-directed Evershed flows are only found in setups with an artificially enhanced horizontal component of the magnetic field at the top boundary that are not consistent with the observed magnetic field properties at the umbra-penumbra boundary. We stress that the photospheric boundary of simulated sunspots is defined by a magnetic field strength of equipartition field value.

scholarly journals Cluster observations of flux rope structures in the near-tail

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 651-666 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. D. Henderson ◽  
C. J. Owen ◽  
I. V. Alexeev ◽  
J. Slavin ◽  
A. N. Fazakerley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Plasma Sheet ◽  
Lower Estimate ◽  
Flux Rope ◽  
Plasma Pressure ◽  
Magnetic Pressure ◽  
Total Force ◽  
Core Field ◽  
Flux Ropes ◽  
The Magnetic Field

Abstract. An investigation of the 2003 Cluster tail season has revealed small flux ropes in the near-tail plasma sheet of Earth. These flux ropes manifest themselves as a bipolar magnetic field signature (usually predominantly in the Z-component) associated with a strong transient peak in one or more of the other components (usually the Y-component). These signatures are interpreted as the passage of a cylindrical magnetic structure with a strong axial magnetic field over the spacecraft position. On the 2 October 2003 all four Cluster spacecraft observed a flux rope in the plasma sheet at X (GSM) ~-17 RE. The flux rope was travelling Earthward and duskward at ~160 kms-1, as determined from multi-spacecraft timing. This is consistent with the observed south-then-north bipolar BZ signature and corresponds to a size of ~0.3 RE (a lower estimate, measuring between the inflection points of the bipolar signature). The axis direction, determined from multi-spacecraft timing and the direction of the strong core field, was close to the intermediate variance direction of the magnetic field. The current inside the flux rope, determined from the curlometer technique, was predominantly parallel to the magnetic field. However, throughout the flux rope, but more significant in the outer sections, a non-zero component of current perpendicular to the magnetic field existed. This shows that the flux rope was not in a "constant α" force-free configuration, i.e. the magnetic force, J×B was also non-zero. In the variance frame of the magnetic field, the components of J×B suggest that the magnetic pressure force was acting to expand the flux rope, i.e. directed away from the centre of the flux rope, whereas the smaller magnetic tension force was acting to compress the flux rope. The plasma pressure is reduced inside the flux rope. A simple estimate of the total force acting on the flux rope from the magnetic forces and surrounding plasma suggests that the flux rope was experiencing an expansive total force. On 13 August 2003 all four Cluster spacecraft observed a flux rope at X (GSM) ~-18 RE. This flux rope was travelling tailward at 200 kms-1, consistent with the observed north-then-south bipolar BZ signature. The bipolar signature corresponds to a size of ~0.3 RE (lower estimate). In this case, the axis, determined from multi-spacecraft timing and the direction of the strong core field, was directed close to the maximum variance direction of the magnetic field. The current had components both parallel and perpendicular to the magnetic field, and J×B was again larger in the outer sections of the flux rope than in the centre. This flux rope was also under expansive magnetic pressure forces from J×B, i.e. directed away from the centre of the flux rope, and had a reduced plasma pressure inside the flux rope. A simple total force calculation suggests that this flux rope was experiencing a large expansive total force. The observations of a larger J×B signature in the outer sections of the flux ropes when compared to the centre may be explained if the flux ropes are observed at an intermediate stage of their evolution after creation by reconnection at multiple X lines near the Cluster apogee. It is suggested that these flux ropes are in the process of relaxing towards the force-free like configuration often observed further down the tail. The centre of the flux ropes may contain older reconnected flux at a later evolutionary stage and may therefore be more force-free.

Predicting geo-effectiveness of CMEs using a novel 3D CME model FRi3D integrated into EUHFORIA 

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefaan Poedts ◽  
Anwesha Maharana ◽  
Camilla Scolini ◽  
Alexey Isavnin
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Solar Wind ◽  
Field Strength ◽  
Magnetic Field Strength ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Flux Rope ◽  
Future Perspective ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Horizon 2020 ◽  
The Magnetic Field

<p>Previous studies of Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs) have shown the importance of understanding their geometrical structure and internal magnetic field configuration for improving forecasting at Earth. The precise prediction of the CME shock and the magnetic cloud arrival time, their magnetic field strength and the orientation upon impact at Earth is still challenging and relies on solar wind and CME evolution models and precise input parameters. In order to understand the propagation of CMEs in the interplanetary medium, we need to understand their interaction with the complex features in the magnetized background solar wind which deforms, deflects and erodes the CMEs and determines their geo-effectiveness. Hence, it is important to model the internal magnetic flux-rope structure in the CMEs as they interact with CIRs/SIRs, other CMEs and solar transients in the heliosphere. The spheromak model (Verbeke et al. 2019) in the heliospheric wind and CME evolution simulation EUHFORIA (Pomoell and Poedts, 2018), fits well with the data near the CME nose close to its axis but fails to predict the magnetic field in CME legs when these impact Earth (Scolini et al. 2019). Therefore, we implemented the FRi3D stretched flux-rope CME model (Isavnin, 2016) in EUHFORIA to model a more realistic CME geometry. Fri3D captures the three-dimensional magnetic field structure with parameters like skewing, pancaking and flattening that quantify deformations experienced by an interplanetary CME. We perform test runs of real CME events and validate the ability of FRi3D coupled with EUHFORIA in predicting the CME geo-effectiveness. We have modeled two real events with FRi3D. First, a CME event on 12 July 2012 which was a head-on encounter at Earth. Second, the flank CME encounter of 14 June 2012 which did not leave any magnetic field signature at Earth when modeled with Spheromak. We compare our results with the results from non-magnetized cone simulations and magnetized simulations employing the spheromak flux-rope model. We further discuss how constraining observational parameters using the stretched flux rope CME geometry in FRi3D affects the prediction of the magnetic field strength in our simulations, highlighting improvements and discussing future perspective.</p><p><em>This research has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 870405 (EUHFORIA 2.0)</em></p>

scholarly journals New Force-Free Models of Magnetic Clouds

2005 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 133-133
Author(s):  
M. Vandas ◽  
E. P. Romashets ◽  
S. Watari
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Magnetic Cloud ◽  
Free Field ◽  
Flux Rope ◽  
Field Vector ◽  
Magnetic Clouds ◽  
Field Magnitude ◽  
Flux Ropes ◽  
Magnetic Field Magnitude ◽  
The Magnetic Field

AbstractMagnetic clouds are thought to be large flux ropes propagating through the heliosphere. Their twisted magnetic fields are mostly modeled by a constant-alpha force-free field in a circular cylindrical flux rope (the Lundquist solution). However, the interplanetary flux ropes are three dimensional objects. In reality they possibly have a curved shape and an oblate cross section. Recently we have found two force-free models of flux ropes which takes into account the mentioned features. These are (i) a constant-alpha force-free configuration in an elliptic flux rope (Vandas & Romashets 2003, A&A, 398, 801), and (ii) a non-constant-alpha force-free field in a toroid with arbitrary aspect ratio (Romashets & Vandas 2003, AIP Conf Ser. 679, 180). Two magnetic cloud observations were analyzed. The magnetic cloud of October 18-19, 1995 has been fitted by Lepping et al. (1997, JGR, 102, 14049) with use of the Lundquist solution. The cloud has a very flat magnetic field magnitude profile. We fitted it by the elliptic solution (i). The magnetic cloud of November 17-18, 1975 has been fitted by Marubashi (1997) with use of a toroidally adjusted Lundquist solution. The cloud has a large magnetic field vector rotation and a large magnetic field magnitude increase over the background level. We fitted it by the toroidal solution (ii). The both fits match the rotation of the magnetic field vector in a comparable quality to the former fits, but the description of the magnetic field magnitude profiles is remarkable better. It is possible to incorporate temporal effects (expansion) of magnetic clouds into the new solutions through a time-dependent alpha parameter as in Shimazu & Vandas (2002, EP&S, 54, 783).

The evolution of magnetic flux ropes in sheared plasma flows

2000 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. SCHMIDT ◽  
P. J. CARGILL
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Magnetic Flux ◽  
Shear Layer ◽  
Cross Section ◽  
Circular Cross Section ◽  
Flux Rope ◽  
Plasma Pressure ◽  
Magnetic Flux Ropes ◽  
Flux Ropes ◽  
The Magnetic Field

The evolution of magnetic flux ropes in a sheared plasma flow is investigated. When the magnetic field outside the flux rope lies parallel to the axis of the flux rope, a flux rope of circular cross-section, whose centre is located at the midpoint of the shear layer, has its shape distorted, but remains in the shear layer. Small displacements of the flux-rope centre above or below the midpoint of the shear layer lead to the flux-rope being expelled from the shear layer. This motion arises because small asymmetries in the plasma pressure around the flux-rope boundary leads to a force that forces the flux rope into a region of uniform flow. When the magnetic field outside the flux rope lies in a plane perpendicular to the flux-rope axis, the flux rope and external magnetic field reconnect with each other, leading to the destruction of the flux rope.

scholarly journals Shearing motions and torus instability in the 2010 April 3 filament eruption

2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (S300) ◽  
pp. 475-476
Author(s):  
F. P. Zuccarello ◽  
P. Romano ◽  
F. Zuccarello ◽  
S. Poedts
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Active Region ◽  
Flux Rope ◽  
Active Region Noaa ◽  
Axial Field ◽  
Drift Motion ◽  
Filament Eruption ◽  
Onset Condition ◽  
Mass Ejection ◽  
The Magnetic Field

AbstractThe magnetic field evolution of active region NOAA 11059 is studied in order to determine the possible causes and mechanisms that led to the initiation of the 2010 April 3 coronal mass ejection (CME).We find (1) that the magnetic configuration of the active region is unstable to the torus instability and (2) that persistent shearing motions characterized the negative polarity, resulting in a southward, almost parallel to the meridians, drift motion of the negative magnetic field concentrations.We conclude that these shearing motions increased the axial field of the filament eventually bringing the flux rope axis to a height where the onset condition for the torus instability was satisfied.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document