On the accuracy of explicitly correlated coupled-cluster interaction energies — have orbital results been beaten yet?

2012 ◽  
Vol 137 (3) ◽  
pp. 034103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Konrad Patkowski
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert A. Shaw ◽  
Grant Hill

In this article we develop a simple statistical model for the prediction of halogen bond interaction energies at equilibrium geometries. The model is based on explicitly correlated coupled cluster results and produces root-mean-squared deviations of 0.14 and 0.28 kcal mol<sup>–1</sup> over separate fitting and validation sets, respectively. We also show how the model can be used to highlight cases where induction or dispersion significantly affect the underlying nature of the interaction.<br>


ChemPhysChem ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (15) ◽  
pp. 3270-3281 ◽  
Author(s):  
Milica Andrejić ◽  
Ulf Ryde ◽  
Ricardo A. Mata ◽  
Pär Söderhjelm

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert A. Shaw ◽  
Grant Hill

In this article we develop a simple statistical model for the prediction of halogen bond interaction energies at equilibrium geometries. The model is based on explicitly correlated coupled cluster results and produces root-mean-squared deviations of 0.14 and 0.28 kcal mol<sup>–1</sup> over separate fitting and validation sets, respectively. We also show how the model can be used to highlight cases where induction or dispersion significantly affect the underlying nature of the interaction.<br>


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manoj Kumar Kesharwani ◽  
Nitai Sylvetsky ◽  
Debashree Manna ◽  
Jan M.L. Martin

<p>We have re-evaluated the X40x10 benchmark for halogen bonding using conventional and explicitly correlated coupled cluster methods. For the aromatic dimers at small separation, improved CCSD(T)–MP2 “high-level corrections” (HLCs) cause substantial reductions in the dissociation energy. For the bromine and iodine species, (n-1)d subvalence correlation increases dissociation energies, and turns out to be more important for noncovalent interactions than is generally realized. As in previous studies, we find that the most efficient way to obtain HLCs is to combine (T) from conventional CCSD(T) calculations with explicitly correlated CCSD-F12–MP2-F12 differences.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document