Determination of the solid-fluid coexistence of the n − 6 Lennard-Jones system from free energy calculations

2012 ◽  
Vol 136 (17) ◽  
pp. 174502 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. G. Sousa ◽  
A. L. Ferreira ◽  
M. A. Barroso
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Braden Kelly ◽  
William Smith

<div>We present a methodology using fixed charge force-fields for alchemical solvation free energy calculations which accounts for the change in polarity that the solute experiences as it transfers from the gas-phase to the condensed phase. We update partial charges using QM/MM snapshots, decoupling the electric field appropriately when updating the partial charges. We also show how to account for the cost of self-polarization. We test our methodology on 30 molecules ranging from small polar to large drug-like molecules. We use Minimum Basis Iterative Stockholder (MBIS), Restrained Electrostatic Potential (RESP) and AM1-BCC partial charge methodologies. Using our method with MP2/cc-pVTZ and MBIS partial charges yields an Average Absolute Deviation (AAD) of 6.3 kJ·mol−1 in comparison with the AM1-BCC result of 8.6 kJ·mol−1. AM1-BCC is within experimental uncertainty on 10% of the data compared to 30% with our method. We conjecture that results can be further improved by using Lennard-Jones and torsional parameters refitted to MBIS and RESP partial charge methods that use high levels of theory.</div>


2007 ◽  
Vol 127 (21) ◽  
pp. 214108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Steinbrecher ◽  
David L. Mobley ◽  
David A. Case

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Braden Kelly ◽  
William Smith

We present a methodology using fixed charge force–fields for alchemical solvation free energy calculations which accounts for the change in polarity that the solute experiences as it transfers from the gas-phase to the condensed phase. We update partial charges use QM/MM snapshots, decoupling the electric field appropriately when updating the partial charges. We also show how to account for the cost of self-polarization. We test our methodology on 30 molecules ranging from small polar to large drug–like molecules.We use Minimum Basis Iterative Stockholder (MBIS), Restrained Electrostatic Potential(RESP) and AM1-BCC partial charge methodologies. Using our method with MP2/cc-pVTZ and MBIS partial charges yields an AAD that is 2.98 kJ·mol−1(0.71 kcal·mol−1) lower than AM1–BCC. AM1–BCC is within experimental uncertainty on 10% of thedata compared to 40% with our method. We conjecture that results can be further improved by using Lennard–Jones and torsional parameters refitted to MBIS and RESP partial charge methods that use high levels of theory.<br>


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Braden Kelly ◽  
William Smith

<div>We present a methodology using fixed charge force-fields for alchemical solvation free energy calculations which accounts for the change in polarity that the solute experiences as it transfers from the gas-phase to the condensed phase. We update partial charges using QM/MM snapshots, decoupling the electric field appropriately when updating the partial charges. We also show how to account for the cost of self-polarization. We test our methodology on 30 molecules ranging from small polar to large drug-like molecules. We use Minimum Basis Iterative Stockholder (MBIS), Restrained Electrostatic Potential (RESP) and AM1-BCC partial charge methodologies. Using our method with MP2/cc-pVTZ and MBIS partial charges yields an Average Absolute Deviation (AAD) of 6.3 kJ·mol−1 in comparison with the AM1-BCC result of 8.6 kJ·mol−1. AM1-BCC is within experimental uncertainty on 10% of the data compared to 30% with our method. We conjecture that results can be further improved by using Lennard-Jones and torsional parameters refitted to MBIS and RESP partial charge methods that use high levels of theory.</div>


2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (11) ◽  
pp. 7841-7850 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael S. Sellers ◽  
Martin Lísal ◽  
John K. Brennan

Several methods are used in sequence to determine the chemical potential of atomistic RDX in the solid and liquid phases, and its corresponding melting point. Results yield the thermodynamic melting point of 488.75 K at 1.0 atm.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document