Monte Carlo study of mixed electrolytes in the primitive model

1992 ◽  
Vol 96 (10) ◽  
pp. 7656-7661 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Bešter ◽  
V. Vlachy
2000 ◽  
Vol 113 (17) ◽  
pp. 7488-7491 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamás Kristóf ◽  
Dezsö Boda ◽  
István Szalai ◽  
Douglas Henderson

RSC Advances ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (64) ◽  
pp. 39017-39025
Author(s):  
Chandra N. Patra

Size and charge correlations in spherical electric double layers are investigated through Monte Carlo simulations and density functional theory, through a solvent primitive model representation.


Methodology ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Holger Steinmetz

Although the use of structural equation modeling has increased during the last decades, the typical procedure to investigate mean differences across groups is still to create an observed composite score from several indicators and to compare the composite’s mean across the groups. Whereas the structural equation modeling literature has emphasized that a comparison of latent means presupposes equal factor loadings and indicator intercepts for most of the indicators (i.e., partial invariance), it is still unknown if partial invariance is sufficient when relying on observed composites. This Monte-Carlo study investigated whether one or two unequal factor loadings and indicator intercepts in a composite can lead to wrong conclusions regarding latent mean differences. Results show that unequal indicator intercepts substantially affect the composite mean difference and the probability of a significant composite difference. In contrast, unequal factor loadings demonstrate only small effects. It is concluded that analyses of composite differences are only warranted in conditions of full measurement invariance, and the author recommends the analyses of latent mean differences with structural equation modeling instead.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document