Rapid convergence of V–V energy transfer calculated using adiabatic basis functions. I. An accurate two‐state model for low‐energy resonant V–V energy transfer. II.

1982 ◽  
Vol 76 (11) ◽  
pp. 5287-5294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Devarajan Thirumalai ◽  
Donald G. Truhlar
Keyword(s):  
Energy Transfer ◽  
Basis Functions ◽  
Low Energy ◽  
State Model ◽  
Rapid Convergence ◽  
Two State Model

Polarographic studies on renaturation of urea-denatured human serum albumin

1989 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 536-543 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josef Chmelík ◽  
Pavel Anzenbacher ◽  
Vítěz Kalous
Keyword(s):  
Human Serum Albumin ◽  
Serum Albumin ◽  
Human Serum ◽  
Irreversible Process ◽  
State Model ◽  
Native Protein ◽  
Main Components ◽  
Two State Model ◽  
Kinetics Of

The renaturation of the two main components of human serum albumin, i.e. of mercaptalbumin and nonmercaptalbumin, was studied polarographically. It has been demonstrated that renaturation of both proteins after 1-min denaturation in 8M urea is reversible. By contrast, renaturation after 200 min denaturation in 8M urea is an irreversible process; the characteristics of renatured mercaptalbumin differ more from the properties of the native protein than the characteristics of nonmercaptalbumin. The studies of the kinetics of renaturation of both proteins have shown that the renaturation can be represented by a two-state model. This means that the existence of stable intermediary products during the renaturation process was not determined polarographically.

Two-state model for bacterial chemoreceptor proteins

1984 ◽  
Vol 176 (3) ◽  
pp. 349-367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sho Asakura ◽  
Hajime Honda
Keyword(s):  
State Model ◽  
Two State Model

Worklife and Unemployment: A New Consideration

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
David I. Rosenbaum ◽  
Kalana Jayanetti
Keyword(s):  
Initial Data ◽  
State Model ◽  
Inactive State ◽  
Three State Model ◽  
Good Proxy ◽  
Two State Model

Abstract Do traditional two-state worklife estimates need adjustment for unemployment? To answer, an augmented three-state model classifies individuals as either 1) employed; 2) unemployed; or 3) inactive but not marginally attached. Periods of unemployment may reduce worklives; however, removal of those marginally attached or discouraged from the inactive state raises worklives. The three-state model results are compared to worklife estimates from the same initial data using the traditional two-state model. Results show that in many cases, the two-state model results are a good proxy for the three-state results that control for unemployment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document