Effect of Ti, V, Cr, and Mn additions on the magnetic properties of a nanocrystalline soft magnetic Fe–Zr–B alloy with high magnetic flux density

1999 ◽  
Vol 85 (8) ◽  
pp. 5127-5129 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Bitoh ◽  
M. Nakazawa ◽  
A. Makino ◽  
A. Inoue ◽  
T. Masumoto
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Properties ◽  
Magnetic Flux ◽  
Flux Density ◽  
Magnetic Flux Density ◽  
Soft Magnetic ◽  
Mn Additions

Effects of Reactive Gas Compositions on the Magnetic Properties and Microstructures of FeTaNC Films

1996 ◽  
Vol 441 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tae-Hyuk Koh ◽  
Dong-Hoon Shin ◽  
Woon Choi ◽  
Dong-Hoon Ahn ◽  
Seoung-Eui Nam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Properties ◽  
Magnetic Flux ◽  
Magnetic Flux Density ◽  
Magnetic Characteristics ◽  
Soft Magnetic Properties ◽  
Soft Magnetic ◽  
Distinctive Difference ◽  
Co Addition ◽  
Soft Magnetism ◽  
Reactive Gas

AbstractSoft magnetic properties and microstructure evolutions of FeTaNC films were investigated, and compared with those of FeTaN and FeTaC films. Effects of substrate species (glass vs. CaTiO3) on the magnetic properties were also investigated. Co-addition of N and C enhances the grain refinements and soft magnetism compared with N or C only addition. Good soft magnetic characteristics of coercivity of 0.17 Oe, permeability of 4000 (5 MHz), and magnetic flux density of 17 kG can be obtained in the FeTaNC films with the relatively wide process ranges. While these values appear to be similar to those of FeTaN films on glass substrate, the most distinctive difference between FeTaNC and FeTaN (or C) films is the effects of substrate. Whereas FeTaNC films show good magnetic characteristics on both glass and CaTiO3 substrates, FeTaN (or C) films show substantial degradation on the CaTiO3 substrate.

Fe-based nanocrystalline FeBCCu soft magnetic alloys with high magnetic flux density

2011 ◽  
Vol 109 (7) ◽  
pp. 07A314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xingdu Fan ◽  
Aibin Ma ◽  
He Men ◽  
Guoqiang Xie ◽  
Baolong Shen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Flux ◽  
Flux Density ◽  
Magnetic Flux Density ◽  
Soft Magnetic ◽  
Magnetic Alloys ◽  
Soft Magnetic Alloys

Magnetic phenomena

2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert E. Newnham
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Magnetic Properties ◽  
Magnetic Susceptibility ◽  
Magnetic Fields ◽  
Magnetic Flux ◽  
Flux Density ◽  
Magnetic Dipole ◽  
Electric Charge ◽  
Dipole Moments ◽  
Magnetic Flux Density

In this chapter we deal with a number of magnetic properties and their directional dependence: pyromagnetism, magnetic susceptibility, magnetoelectricity, and piezomagnetism. In the course of dealing with these properties, two new ideas are introduced: magnetic symmetry and axial tensors. Moving electric charge generates magnetic fields and magnetization. Macroscopically, an electric current i flowing in a coil of n turns per meter produces a magnetic field H = ni amperes/meter [A/m]. On the atomic scale, magnetization arises from unpaired electron spins and unbalanced electronic orbital motion. The weber [Wb] is the basic unit of magnetic charge m. The force between two magnetic charges m1 and m2 is where r is the separation distance and μ0 (=4π×10−7 H/m) is the permeability of vacuum. In a magnetic field H, magnetic charge experiences a force F = mH [N]. North and south poles (magnetic charges) separated by a distance r create magnetic dipole moments mr [Wb m]. Magnetic dipole moments provide a convenient way of picturing the atomistic origins arising from moving electric charge. Magnetization (I) is the magnetic dipole moment per unit volume and is expressed in units of Wb m/m3 = Wb/m2. The magnetic flux density (B = I + μ0H) is also in Wb/m2 and is analogous to the electric displacement D. All materials respond to magnetic fields, producing a magnetization I = χH, and a magnetic flux density B = μH where χ is the magnetic susceptibility and μ is the magnetic permeability. Both χ and μ are in henries/m (H/m). The permeability μ = χ + μ0 and is analogous to electric permittivity. χ and μ are sometimes expressed as dimensionless quantities (x ̅ and μ ̅ and ) like the dielectric constant, where = x ̅/μ0 and = μ ̅/μ0. Other magnetic properties will be defined later in the chapter. A schematic view of the submicroscopic origins of magnetic phenomena is presented in Fig. 14.1. Most materials are diamagnetic with only a weak magnetic response induced by an applied magnetic field.

Study on Control Method of Magnetic Flux Density Waveform in AC Magnetic Measurement

2021 ◽  
Vol 1034 ◽  
pp. 135-140
Author(s):  
Nobuhiro Takita ◽  
Kyyoul Yun
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Material ◽  
Magnetic Properties ◽  
Magnetic Flux ◽  
Flux Density ◽  
Control Method ◽  
Magnetic Measurement ◽  
Magnetic Flux Density ◽  
Sinusoidal Wave ◽  
Voltage Waveform ◽  
Noise Cancelling

To estimate the magnetic properties of the magnetic material, magnetic flux density waveform (B waveform) must be sinusoidal wave. However, it is necessary to control the exciting waveform in consideration of the distortion, because voltage waveform induced by B-coil is distorted due to the magnetic properties. As a result, the IBCM can make B waveform sinusoidal wave with the least number of feedbacks than any control method. Because the IBCM performs noise cancelling for measured waveform and make accurate exciting waveform from measured waveform.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document