scholarly journals Heavy ion fusion systems assessment study

1986 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald J. Dudziak ◽  
W. B. Herrmannsfeldt
Keyword(s):  
Heavy Ion ◽  
Fusion Systems ◽  
Assessment Study ◽  
Heavy Ion Fusion

Heavy Ion Fusion Systems Assessment - An Overview

1986 ◽  
Vol 10 (3P2B) ◽  
pp. 1437-1437
Author(s):  
Lester M. Waganer ◽  
Daniel E. Driemeyer ◽  
David S. Zuckerman ◽  
Kenneth W. Billman
Keyword(s):  
Heavy Ion ◽  
Fusion Systems ◽  
Heavy Ion Fusion

An Induction Linac Driven Heavy-Ion Fusion Systems Model

1988 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 217-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
David S. Zuckerman ◽  
Daniel E. Driemeyer ◽  
Lester M. Waganer ◽  
Donald J. Dudziak
Keyword(s):  
Heavy Ion ◽  
Fusion Systems ◽  
Systems Model ◽  
Heavy Ion Fusion ◽  
Induction Linac

U.S. Heavy-Ion Fusion Systems Assessment Project Overview

1988 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 207-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald J. Dudziak ◽  
William W. Saylor ◽  
William B. Herrmannsfeldt
Keyword(s):  
Heavy Ion ◽  
Fusion Systems ◽  
Heavy Ion Fusion

Heavy-Ion Fusion Systems Assessment Implications for Reactors

1988 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 290-332 ◽  
Author(s):  
John H. Pendergrass
Keyword(s):  
Heavy Ion ◽  
Fusion Systems ◽  
Heavy Ion Fusion

scholarly journals Directions for reactor target design based on the U.S. Heavy Ion Fusion Systems Assessment

1987 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 517-524 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. C. Wilson ◽  
D. Dudziak ◽  
G. Magelssen ◽  
D. Zuckerman ◽  
D. Driemeyer
Keyword(s):  
Peak Power ◽  
Figure Of Merit ◽  
Economies Of Scale ◽  
Heavy Ion ◽  
Design Work ◽  
Fusion Systems ◽  
Electricity Cost ◽  
Heavy Ion Fusion ◽  
Target Design ◽  
The U.S

The Heavy-Ion Fusion Systems Assessment project is nearing completion of a two-year effort. The resulting system modelwill be used to set directions for future target design work.Major uncertainties in target design were studied using thecost of electricity as a figure of merit. Net electric power was fixed at 1000 MW to eliminate large effects due to economies of scale. The system is relatively insensitive to target gain, factors of three changes in gain resulting in 8 to 12% changes in electricity cost. Possible increased peak power requirements pose only a small cost risk, but require many more beamlets for transport. A shortening ofthe required ion range causes both cost and beamlet difficulties. A factor of 4 decrease in the required range at a fixed driver energy increases electricity cost by 44% and raises the number of beamlets to 240. Finally, the heavy ion fusion system can accommodate large increases in target costs. Thus, to address the major uncertainties, target design should concentrate on requirements for ion range andpeak driver power.

ITEP conception of a heavy ion fusion facility

1996 ◽  
Vol 32-33 ◽  
pp. 73-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikhail M. Basko ◽  
Mikhail D. Churazov ◽  
Dimitri G. Koshkarev
Keyword(s):  
Heavy Ion ◽  
Heavy Ion Fusion
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document