Communication: Rotational g-factor and spin-rotation constant of CH+

2010 ◽  
Vol 133 (17) ◽  
pp. 171101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephan P. A. Sauer
1964 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 330-332 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Bodenstedt ◽  
C. Günther ◽  
J. Radeloff ◽  
W. Engels ◽  
W. Delang ◽  
...  

1975 ◽  
Vol 53 (19) ◽  
pp. 2232-2241 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. Brown ◽  
D. A. Ramsay

The [Formula: see text] band systems of HCO and DCO have been reinvestigated with higher resolving power than in earlier work. Some weak lines have been assigned to K′ = 0 – K″ = 0 and K′ = 0 – K″ = 2 subbands; these lines derive their intensity from axis switching. The new data give values for the A rotational constants of HCO and DCO and permit a more reliable determination of the ground state geometry, viz, r0(CH) = 1.125(5) Å, r0(CO) = 1.175(1) Å, [Formula: see text]. The sign of the spin–rotation constant εaa has been shown to be positive.


1999 ◽  
Vol 198 (1) ◽  
pp. 183-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaley A. Walker ◽  
Michael C.L. Gerry

1995 ◽  
Vol 103 (1) ◽  
pp. 104-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shih‐Huang Lee ◽  
I‐Chia Chen

2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 3112-3123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taye Beyene Demissie

How the electronic contribution to the spin-rotation constant is close to the paramagnetic contribution of the NMR absolute shielding constant?


1976 ◽  
Vol 61 (2) ◽  
pp. 216-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine L. Saenger ◽  
Richard N. Zare ◽  
C.Weldon Mathews

1968 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 2314-2321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irving Ozier ◽  
Lawrence M. Crapo ◽  
Norman F. Ramsey

1972 ◽  
Vol 50 (12) ◽  
pp. 1252-1261 ◽  
Author(s):  
James A. Courtney ◽  
Robin L. Armstrong

The spin–lattice relaxation time T1 of the 19F nuclei was measured in gaseous samples of CF4, SiF4, GeF4, and SF6 at room temperature for densities from 0.015 to 20 amagat. In each case T1 was observed to pass through a minimum for some density less than 0.50 amagat. In addition, T1 was measured in the extreme narrowing region for SF6 at 238, 265, 293, 313, and 349.5 K.. The spin–rotation interaction provides the dominant relaxation mechanism in all cases. The data are analyzed on the basis of the assumption that the collision modulated spin–rotation interaction may be described by a single correlation function which is a simple exponential function of time. Values of an effective spin–rotation constant and a cross section for molecular reorientation are obtained for each gas. Assuming the validity of the model used to analyze the relaxation data, the combination of nuclear magnetic relaxation results with molecular beam measurements yields more accurate values of the anisotropic spin–rotation constant Cd than have been previously available.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document