Fundamental processes in pair plasma

1983 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan P. Lightman
Keyword(s):  
2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (12) ◽  
pp. 122102
Author(s):  
M. E. Dieckmann ◽  
S. J. Spencer ◽  
M. Falk ◽  
G. Rowlands

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rakhee Malik ◽  
Hitendra K. Malik ◽  
Subhash C. Kaushik

1999 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
MAXIM LYUTIKOV

Beam instabilities in the strongly magnetized electron–positron plasma of a pulsar magnetosphere are considered. We analyse the resonance conditions and estimate the growth rates of the Cherenkov and cyclotron instabilities of the ordinary (O), extraordinary (X) and Alfvén modes in two limiting regimes: kinetic and hydrodynamic. The importance of the different instabilities as a source of coherent pulsar radiation generation is then estimated, taking into account the angular dependence of the growth rates and the limitations on the length of the coherent wave–particle interaction imposed by the curvature of the magnetic field lines. We conclude that in the pulsar magnetosphere, Cherenkov-type instabilities occur in the hydrodynamic regime, while cyclotron-type instabilities occur in the kinetic regime. We argue that electromagnetic cyclotron-type instabilities on the X, O and probably Alfvén waves are more likely to develop in the pulsar magnetosphere.


2014 ◽  
Vol 80 (3) ◽  
pp. 513-516
Author(s):  
Frank Verheest

In a recent paper ‘Propagation of solitary waves and shock wavelength in the pair plasma (J. Plasma Phys. 78, 525–529, 2012)’, Malekolkalami and Mohammadi investigate nonlinear electrostatic solitary waves in a plasma comprising adiabatic electrons and positrons, and a stationary ion background. The paper contains two parts: First, the solitary wave properties are discussed through a pseudopotential approach, and then the influence of a small dissipation is intuitively sketched without theoretical underpinning. Small dissipation is claimed to lead to a shock wave whose wavelength is determined by linear oscillator analysis. Unfortunately, there are errors and inconsistencies in both the parts, and their combination is incoherent.


2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (10) ◽  
pp. 105202
Author(s):  
Wei-Yuan Liu ◽  
Wen Luo ◽  
Tao Yuan ◽  
Ji-Ye Yu ◽  
Min Chen

1994 ◽  
Vol 159 ◽  
pp. 5-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joel N. Bregman

The general understanding of the continuum emission from AGN has changed from the picture where nonthermal processes were responsible for all of the emission. The current body of observation indicates that there are two types of objects, one being the blazar class (or blazar component), where nearly all of the emission is nonthermal, due primarily to synchrotron and inverse Compton emission. Variability studies indicate that the emitting region decreases with size from the radio through the X-ray region, where the size of the X-ray region is of order a light hour. More than two dozen of these radio-loud AGNs have been detected at GeV energies (one source at TeV energies), for which the radiation mechanism may be inverse Compton mechanism.In the other class, the radio-quiet AGN (component), the emission is almost entirely thermal, with radiation from dust dominating the near infrared to submillimeter region. The optical to soft X-ray emission is often ascribed to black body emission from an opaque accretion disk, but variability studies may not be consistent with expectations. Another attractive model has free-free emission being responsible for the optical to soft X-ray emission. The highest frequencies at which these AGN are detected is the MeV range, and these data should help to determine if this emission is produced in a scattering atmosphere, such as that around an accretion disk, or by another model involving an opaque pair plasma.


1994 ◽  
Vol 159 ◽  
pp. 347-347
Author(s):  
A. Marcowith ◽  
G. Henri ◽  
G. Pelletier

Since its launch, CGRO has detected more than 20 γ-ray emitting AGN, most of them associated with powerful, radio-loud, flat-spectrum objects, exhibiting VLBI superluminal motions. In the case of 3C279, the huge value of the apparent luminosity (∼ 1048erg.s−1) and the variability time-scale of a few days (Hartmann et al., 1992) gives a very large compacity lapp ≃ 200, that is, the medium should be completely thick to γ-rays. This contradiction can be explained if the γ-rays originate from a relativistic jet pointing at a small angle with respect to the line of sight (Maraschi et al., 1992). However, the still large value of compacity suggests the existence of an inner, more compact region where pair production can take place efficiently (Henri et al., 1993). This supports the so-called “two-flow” model, where the superluminal motion is attributed to the expansion of a relativistic pair plasma heated by a MHD jet from an accretion disk (Sol et al., 1989). Hence we propose to interpret the spectral break observed in many objects around a few MeV (Lichti et al., 1993) by an opacity effect due to photon-photon absorption by pair production.


2016 ◽  
Vol 688 ◽  
pp. 012010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui Chen ◽  
J. Bonlie ◽  
R. Cauble ◽  
F. Fiuza ◽  
W. Goldstein ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 621 ◽  
pp. A142 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. E. Dieckmann ◽  
D. Folini ◽  
I. Hotz ◽  
A. Nordman ◽  
P. Dell’Acqua ◽  
...  

Aims. We study the effect a guiding magnetic field has on the formation and structure of a pair jet that propagates through a collisionless electron–proton plasma at rest. Methods. We model with a particle-in-cell (PIC) simulation a pair cloud with a temperature of 400 keV and a mean speed of 0.9c (c - light speed). Pair particles are continuously injected at the boundary. The cloud propagates through a spatially uniform, magnetized, and cool ambient electron–proton plasma at rest. The mean velocity vector of the pair cloud is aligned with the uniform background magnetic field. The pair cloud has a lateral extent of a few ion skin depths. Results. A jet forms in time. Its outer cocoon consists of jet-accelerated ambient plasma and is separated from the inner cocoon by an electromagnetic piston with a thickness that is comparable to the local thermal gyroradius of jet particles. The inner cocoon consists of pair plasma, which lost its directed flow energy while it swept out the background magnetic field and compressed it into the electromagnetic piston. A beam of electrons and positrons moves along the jet spine at its initial speed. Its electrons are slowed down and some positrons are accelerated as they cross the head of the jet. The latter escape upstream along the magnetic field, which yields an excess of megaelectronvolt positrons ahead of the jet. A filamentation instability between positrons and protons accelerates some of the protons, which were located behind the electromagnetic piston at the time it formed, to megaelectronvolt energies. Conclusions. A microscopic pair jet in collisionless plasma has a structure that is similar to that predicted by a hydrodynamic model of relativistic astrophysical pair jets. It is a source of megaelectronvolt positrons. An electromagnetic piston acts as the contact discontinuity between the inner and outer cocoons. It would form on subsecond timescales in a plasma with a density that is comparable to that of the interstellar medium in the rest frame of the latter. A supercritical fast magnetosonic shock will form between the pristine ambient plasma and the jet-accelerated plasma on a timescale that exceeds our simulation time by an order of magnitude.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document