On the Analysis of the Fedorenko Finite Superelement Method for Simulation of Processes with Small-Scale Singularities

Author(s):  
M. Galanin ◽  
S. Lazareva ◽  
Michail D. Todorov ◽  
Christo I. Christov
2002 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Galanin ◽  
E. Savenkov

In this work we introduce variational equation which natural Petrov‐Galerkin approximation leads to Fedorenko Finite Superelement Method (FSEM). FSEM is considered as Petrov‐Galerkin approximation of the certain problem for traces of boundary‐value problem solution at the boundaries of some subdomains (superelements). Iterative methods of solution of the same problem are well known domain decomposition methods. Some numerical results are presented.


2001 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-24
Author(s):  
M. Galanin ◽  
S. Lazareva ◽  
E. Savenkov

AbstractThis paper considers the Fedorenko Finite Superelement Method (FSEM) and some of its applications. The general idea, the main theoretical background, and the results of the numerical investigation of the method are presented using the model problem for the Laplace equation. Generalization to some other problems using the general approach suggested by the authors is also considered.


2007 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikhail Galanin ◽  
Mikhail Lazarev ◽  
Evgeny Savenkov

The results of numerical investigation of the Finite Superelement Method (FSEM) for the solution of 3D elasticity problems are given. A definition of FSEM is proposed, and the general theory is briefly explained. Then the variants of FSEM are considered for the model problem. Their comparative analysis is being carried out. These variants are based on the finite element interpolation techniques on superelements boundaries. FSEM and FEM efficiency comparison is presented for the model problem. Quantative error data are obtained. A certain example of a 3D elasticity problem is considered in conclusion. A notable advantage of a higher degree FSEM approximation technique is illustrated.


2019 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Buckner ◽  
Luke Glowacki

Abstract De Dreu and Gross predict that attackers will have more difficulty winning conflicts than defenders. As their analysis is presumed to capture the dynamics of decentralized conflict, we consider how their framework compares with ethnographic evidence from small-scale societies, as well as chimpanzee patterns of intergroup conflict. In these contexts, attackers have significantly more success in conflict than predicted by De Dreu and Gross's model. We discuss the possible reasons for this disparity.


2000 ◽  
Vol 179 ◽  
pp. 403-406
Author(s):  
M. Karovska ◽  
B. Wood ◽  
J. Chen ◽  
J. Cook ◽  
R. Howard

AbstractWe applied advanced image enhancement techniques to explore in detail the characteristics of the small-scale structures and/or the low contrast structures in several Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs) observed by SOHO. We highlight here the results from our studies of the morphology and dynamical evolution of CME structures in the solar corona using two instruments on board SOHO: LASCO and EIT.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document