The Globular Cluster Relative Ages and the Milky Way Formation Time Scale

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Aparicio ◽  
Antonio Marín-Franch ◽  
Giampaolo Piotto ◽  
Alfred Rosenberg ◽  
Brian Chaboyer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Globular Cluster ◽  
Time Scale ◽  
Milky Way ◽  
Formation Time

scholarly journals The globular cluster system of the Auriga simulations

2020 ◽  
Vol 496 (1) ◽  
pp. 638-648 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timo L R Halbesma ◽  
Robert J J Grand ◽  
Facundo A Gómez ◽  
Federico Marinacci ◽  
Rüdiger Pakmor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Globular Cluster ◽  
Milky Way ◽  
Cluster Formation ◽  
Solar Radius ◽  
High Mass ◽  
Formation Model ◽  
The Galaxy ◽  
High Mass Loss ◽  
Globular Cluster System ◽  
Varying Mass

ABSTRACT We investigate whether the galaxy and star formation model used for the Auriga simulations can produce a realistic globular cluster (GC) population. We compare statistics of GC candidate star particles in the Auriga haloes with catalogues of the Milky Way (MW) and Andromeda (M31) GC populations. We find that the Auriga simulations do produce sufficient stellar mass for GC candidates at radii and metallicities that are typical for the MW GC system (GCS). We also find varying mass ratios of the simulated GC candidates relative to the observed mass in the MW and M31 GCSs for different bins of galactocentric radius metallicity (rgal–[Fe/H]). Overall, the Auriga simulations produce GC candidates with higher metallicities than the MW and M31 GCS and they are found at larger radii than observed. The Auriga simulations would require bound cluster formation efficiencies higher than 10 per cent for the metal-poor GC candidates, and those within the Solar radius should experience negligible destruction rates to be consistent with observations. GC candidates in the outer halo, on the other hand, should either have low formation efficiencies, or experience high mass-loss for the Auriga simulations to produce a GCS that is consistent with that of the MW or M31. Finally, the scatter in the metallicity as well as in the radial distribution between different Auriga runs is considerably smaller than the differences between that of the MW and M31 GCSs. The Auriga model is unlikely to give rise to a GCS that can be consistent with both galaxies.

scholarly journals On the origin of the helium-rich population in the peculiar globular cluster Omega Centauri

2009 ◽  
Vol 5 (S268) ◽  
pp. 187-188
Author(s):  
Donatella Romano ◽  
M. Tosi ◽  
M. Cignoni ◽  
F. Matteucci ◽  
E. Pancino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chemical Composition ◽  
Globular Cluster ◽  
Main Sequence ◽  
Milky Way ◽  
Dwarf Galaxy ◽  
Potential Well ◽  
Galactic Winds ◽  
Supernova Explosions

AbstractIn this contribution we discuss the origin of the extreme helium-rich stars which inhabit the blue main sequence (bMS) of the Galactic globular cluster Omega Centauri. In a scenario where the cluster is the surviving remnant of a dwarf galaxy ingested by the Milky Way many Gyr ago, the peculiar chemical composition of the bMS stars can be naturally explained by considering the effects of strong differential galactic winds, which develop owing to multiple supernova explosions in a shallow potential well.

scholarly journals Globular Cluster and Galaxy Formation: M31, the Milky Way, and Implications for Globular Cluster Systems of Spiral Galaxies

2004 ◽  
Vol 614 (1) ◽  
pp. 158-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Burstein ◽  
Yong Li ◽  
Kenneth C. Freeman ◽  
John E. Norris ◽  
Michael S. Bessell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Galaxy Formation ◽  
Globular Cluster ◽  
Milky Way ◽  
Spiral Galaxies ◽  
Cluster Systems

scholarly journals Double X/Peanut Structures in Barred Galaxies – Insights from an N–body Simulation

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bogdan C Ciambur ◽  
Francesca Fragkoudi ◽  
Sergey Khoperskov ◽  
Paola Di Matteo ◽  
Françoise Combes
Keyword(s):  
Dark Matter ◽  
Milky Way ◽  
Large Fraction ◽  
Formation Time ◽  
Dark Matter Halo ◽  
Barred Galaxies ◽  
Pattern Speed ◽  
Nearby Galaxies ◽  
Dynamical Instabilities ◽  
Bow Tie

Abstract Boxy, peanut– or X–shaped “bulges” are observed in a large fraction of barred galaxies viewed in, or close to, edge-on projection, as well as in the Milky Way. They are the product of dynamical instabilities occurring in stellar bars, which cause the latter to buckle and thicken vertically. Recent studies have found nearby galaxies that harbour two such features arising at different radial scales, in a nested configuration. In this paper we explore the formation of such double peanuts, using a collisionless N–body simulation of a pure disc evolving in isolation within a live dark matter halo, which we analyse in a completely analogous way to observations of real galaxies. In the simulation we find a stable double configuration consisting of two X/peanut structures associated to the same galactic bar – rotating with the same pattern speed – but with different morphology, formation time, and evolution. The inner, conventional peanut-shaped structure forms early via the buckling of the bar, and experiences little evolution once it stabilises. This feature is consistent in terms of size, strength and morphology, with peanut structures observed in nearby galaxies. The outer structure, however, displays a strong X, or “bow-tie”, morphology. It forms just after the inner peanut, and gradually extends in time (within 1 to 1.5 Gyr) to almost the end of the bar, a radial scale where ansae occur. We conclude that, although both structures form, and are dynamically coupled to, the same bar, they are supported by inherently different mechanisms.

The Mass Distribution of the Milky Way Deduced from Globular Cluster Dynamics

1996 ◽  
pp. 697-702 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Dauphole ◽  
J. Colin ◽  
M. Geffert ◽  
M. Odenkirchen ◽  
H.-J. Tucholke
Keyword(s):  
Mass Distribution ◽  
Globular Cluster ◽  
Milky Way

scholarly journals How to Model the Chemical Evolution of Galaxies

1993 ◽  
Vol 155 ◽  
pp. 557-566
Author(s):  
Joachim Köppen
Keyword(s):  
Star Formation ◽  
Chemical Evolution ◽  
Time Scale ◽  
Life Time ◽  
Magellanic Clouds ◽  
Formation Time ◽  
List Type ◽  
The Galaxy ◽  
H Ii Region ◽  
Magellanic Stream

For a first interpretation of the comparison of observational data, the crude “Simple Model” of chemical evolution is quite useful. Since it has well been described in the literature (e.g. Pagel and Patchett 1975, Tinsley 1980), let us here just review the assumptions and whether they are satisfied: 1.The galaxy is a closed system, with no exchange of matter with its surroundings: For the solar neighbourhood this probably is not true (the infamous Gdwarf-“problem”, Pagel 1989b). For the Magellanic Clouds this is most certainly wrong, because of the presence of the Inter-Cloud Region and the Magellanic Stream, and evidence for interaction with each other and the Galaxy as well (cf. e.g. Westerlund 1990).2.It initially consists entirely of gas (without loss of generality of primordial composition): This is good approximation also for models with gas infall, as long as the infall occurs with a time scale shorter than the star formation time scale.3.The metal production of the average stellar generation (the yield y) is constant with time: Initially, it is reasonable to make this assumption. For tables of the oxygen yield see Koppen and Arimoto (1991).4.The metal rich gas ejected by the stars is completely mixed with the ambient gas. To neglect the finite stellar life times (“instantaneous recycling approximation”) is appropriate for elements synthesized in stars whose life time is much shorter than the star formation time scale, such as oxygen, neon, sulphur, and argon.5.The gas is well mixed at all times: We don't know. The dispersion of H II region abundances may give an indication. In the Magellanic Clouds Dufour (1984) finds quite a low value (±0.08 dex for oyxgen).

scholarly journals An Overview of the Globular Cluster System of the Galaxy

1988 ◽  
Vol 126 ◽  
pp. 37-48
Author(s):  
Robert Zinn
Keyword(s):  
Globular Cluster ◽  
Globular Clusters ◽  
Milky Way ◽  
Galactic Center ◽  
Galactic Plane ◽  
Cluster System ◽  
Open Clusters ◽  
The Galaxy ◽  
Globular Cluster System ◽  
Harlow Shapley

Harlow Shapley (1918) used the positions of globular clusters in space to determine the dimensions of our Galaxy. His conclusion that the Sun does not lie near the center of the Galaxy is widely recognized as one of the most important astronomical discoveries of this century. Nearly as important, but much less publicized, was his realization that, unlike stars, open clusters, HII regions and planetary nebulae, globular clusters are not concentrated near the plane of the Milky Way. His data showed that the globular clusters are distributed over very large distances from the galactic plane and the galactic center. Ever since this discovery that the Galaxy has a vast halo containing globular clusters, it has been clear that these clusters are key objects for probing the evolution of the Galaxy. Later work, which showed that globular clusters are very old and, on average, very metal poor, underscored their importance. In the spirit of this research, which started with Shapley's, this review discusses the characteristics of the globular cluster system that have the most bearing on the evolution of the Galaxy.

scholarly journals Dynamics of Globular Cluster Systems

1983 ◽  
Vol 100 ◽  
pp. 359-364
Author(s):  
K. C. Freeman
Keyword(s):  
Globular Cluster ◽  
Globular Clusters ◽  
Milky Way ◽  
Cluster Formation ◽  
Active Phase ◽  
Chemical Abundance ◽  
Cluster Systems ◽  
Chemical Enrichment ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
The Galaxy

In the Milky Way, the globular clusters are all very old, and we are accustomed to think of them as the oldest objects in the Galaxy. The clusters cover a wide range of chemical abundance, from near solar down to about [Fe/H] ⋍ −2.3. However there are field stars with abundances significantly lower than −2.3 (eg Bond, 1980); this implies that the clusters formed during the active phase of chemical enrichment, with cluster formation beginning at a time when the enrichment processes were already well under way.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document