Systematically convergent basis sets for explicitly correlated wavefunctions: The atoms H, He, B–Ne, and Al–Ar

2008 ◽  
Vol 128 (8) ◽  
pp. 084102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirk A. Peterson ◽  
Thomas B. Adler ◽  
Hans-Joachim Werner
Keyword(s):  
Basis Sets ◽  
Explicitly Correlated

scholarly journals The S66 Non-Covalent Interactions Benchmark Reconsidered Using Explicitly Correlated Methods Near the Basis Set Limit

2018 ◽  
Vol 71 (4) ◽  
pp. 238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manoj K. Kesharwani ◽  
Amir Karton ◽  
Nitai Sylvetsky ◽  
Jan M. L. Martin
Keyword(s):  
Computational Cost ◽  
The Other ◽  
Basis Set ◽  
Basis Sets ◽  
Explicitly Correlated ◽  
Non Covalent Interactions ◽  
Explicitly Correlated Methods ◽  
The One ◽  
High Level ◽  
Covalent Interactions

The S66 benchmark for non-covalent interactions has been re-evaluated using explicitly correlated methods with basis sets near the one-particle basis set limit. It is found that post-MP2 ‘high-level corrections’ are treated adequately well using a combination of CCSD(F12*) with (aug-)cc-pVTZ-F12 basis sets on the one hand, and (T) extrapolated from conventional CCSD(T)/heavy-aug-cc-pV{D,T}Z on the other hand. Implications for earlier benchmarks on the larger S66×8 problem set in particular, and for accurate calculations on non-covalent interactions in general, are discussed. At a slight cost in accuracy, (T) can be considerably accelerated by using sano-V{D,T}Z+ basis sets, whereas half-counterpoise CCSD(F12*)(T)/cc-pVDZ-F12 offers the best compromise between accuracy and computational cost.

Optimized auxiliary basis sets for explicitly correlated methods

2008 ◽  
Vol 129 (18) ◽  
pp. 184108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazim E. Yousaf ◽  
Kirk A. Peterson
Keyword(s):  
Basis Sets ◽  
Explicitly Correlated ◽  
Explicitly Correlated Methods

The X40x10 Halogen Bonding Benchmark Revisited: Surprising Importance of (n-1)d Subvalence Correlation

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manoj Kumar Kesharwani ◽  
Nitai Sylvetsky ◽  
Debashree Manna ◽  
Jan M.L. Martin
Keyword(s):  
Noncovalent Interactions ◽  
Halogen Bonding ◽  
Basis Set ◽  
Basis Sets ◽  
Coupled Cluster ◽  
Dissociation Energies ◽  
Explicitly Correlated ◽  
Two Factors ◽  
High Level ◽  
Cluster Methods

<p>We have re-evaluated the X40x10 benchmark for halogen bonding using conventional and explicitly correlated coupled cluster methods. For the aromatic dimers at small separation, improved CCSD(T)–MP2 “high-level corrections” (HLCs) cause substantial reductions in the dissociation energy. For the bromine and iodine species, (n-1)d subvalence correlation increases dissociation energies, and turns out to be more important for noncovalent interactions than is generally realized; ; (n-1)sp subvalence correlation is much less important. The (n-1)d subvalence term is dominated by core-valence correlation; with the smaller cc-pVDZ-F12-PP and cc-pVTZ-F12-PP basis sets, basis set convergence for the core-core contribution becomes sufficiently erratic that it may compromise results overall. The two factors conspire to generate discrepancies of up to 0.9 kcal/mol (0.16 kcal/mol RMS) between the original X40x10 data and the present revision.</p>

Nuclear-electronic orbital reduced explicitly correlated Hartree-Fock approach: Restricted basis sets and open-shell systems

2015 ◽  
Vol 142 (21) ◽  
pp. 214108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kurt R. Brorsen ◽  
Andrew Sirjoosingh ◽  
Michael V. Pak ◽  
Sharon Hammes-Schiffer
Keyword(s):  
Open Shell ◽  
Basis Sets ◽  
Hartree Fock ◽  
Explicitly Correlated
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document