Theoretical study of plasma effect on a conical shock wave

2006 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 033505 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. P. Kuo ◽  
Steven S. Kuo
Keyword(s):  
Shock Wave ◽  
Theoretical Study ◽  
Conical Shock ◽  
Plasma Effect

Nonequilibrium Radio Frequency Discharge Plasma Effect on Conical Shock Wave: M = 2.5 Flow

AIAA Journal ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 465-469 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Palm ◽  
Rodney Meyer ◽  
Elke Plonjes ◽  
J. William Rich ◽  
Igor V. Adamovich
Keyword(s):  
Shock Wave ◽  
Radio Frequency ◽  
Discharge Plasma ◽  
Conical Shock ◽  
Radio Frequency Discharge ◽  
Plasma Effect

Simulation of Interaction between a Spherical Shock Wave and a Layer of Granular Material in a Conical Shock Tube

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 685-690
Author(s):  
S. V. Khomik ◽  
I. V. Guk ◽  
A. N. Ivantsov ◽  
S. P. Medvedev ◽  
E. K. Anderzhanov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Shock Wave ◽  
Granular Material ◽  
Shock Tube ◽  
Spherical Shock Wave ◽  
Conical Shock ◽  
Spherical Shock

A simple similarity law of conical shock wave

1994 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liao Jinhua ◽  
Deng Xueying
Keyword(s):  
Shock Wave ◽  
Conical Shock ◽  
Similarity Law

scholarly journals Theoretical study on regular reflection of shock wave–boundary layer interactions

2020 ◽  
Vol 899 ◽  
Author(s):  
Longsheng Xue ◽  
Ferry F. J. Schrijer ◽  
Bas W. van Oudheusden ◽  
Chengpeng Wang ◽  
Zhiwei Shi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Shock Wave ◽  
Theoretical Study ◽  
Regular Reflection ◽  
Wave Boundary Layer ◽  
Image Position ◽  
Wave Boundary

Abstract

scholarly journals Direct numerical simulation of conical shock wave–turbulent boundary layer interaction

2019 ◽  
Vol 877 ◽  
pp. 167-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feng-Yuan Zuo ◽  
Antonio Memmolo ◽  
Guo-ping Huang ◽  
Sergio Pirozzoli
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Simulation ◽  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Shock Wave ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer ◽  
Direct Numerical Simulation ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Stokes Equations ◽  
Shear Stresses ◽  
Mean Flow ◽  
Conical Shock

Direct numerical simulation of the Navier–Stokes equations is carried out to investigate the interaction of a conical shock wave with a turbulent boundary layer developing over a flat plate at free-stream Mach number $M_{\infty }=2.05$ and Reynolds number $Re_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D703}}\approx 630$, based on the upstream boundary layer momentum thickness. The shock is generated by a circular cone with half opening angle $\unicode[STIX]{x1D703}_{c}=25^{\circ }$. As found in experiments, the wall pressure exhibits a distinctive N-wave signature, with a sharp peak right past the precursor shock generated at the cone apex, followed by an extended zone with favourable pressure gradient, and terminated by the trailing shock associated with recompression in the wake of the cone. The boundary layer behaviour is strongly affected by the imposed pressure gradient. Streaks are suppressed in adverse pressure gradient (APG) zones, but re-form rapidly in downstream favourable pressure gradient (FPG) zones. Three-dimensional mean flow separation is only observed in the first APG region associated with the formation of a horseshoe vortex, whereas the second APG region features an incipient detachment state, with scattered spots of instantaneous reversed flow. As found in canonical geometrically two-dimensional wedge-generated shock–boundary layer interactions, different amplification of the turbulent stress components is observed through the interacting shock system, with approach to an isotropic state in APG regions, and to a two-component anisotropic state in FPG. The general adequacy of the Boussinesq hypothesis is found to predict the spatial organization of the turbulent shear stresses, although different eddy viscosities should be used for each component, as in tensor eddy-viscosity models, or in full Reynolds stress closures.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document