Tunneling resonances and Andreev reflection through an interaction quantum dot coupled with two half metals and a superconductor

2006 ◽  
Vol 99 (8) ◽  
pp. 08F713 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin-Fu Feng ◽  
Xiao-Shan Wu ◽  
Shu-Sheng Jiang
NANO ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 01 (03) ◽  
pp. 259-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. S. ATALLAH ◽  
A. H. PHILLIPS ◽  
A. F. AMIN ◽  
M. A. SEMARY

The influence of time-varying fields on the transport through a mesoscopic device has been investigated. This mesoscopic device is modeled as a quantum dot coupled to superconducting reservoirs via quantum point contact. The effect of a magnetic field and the Andreev reflection process were taken into account. The conductance was deduced by using Landuaer–Buttiker equation. A numerical calculation has been performed that shows a resonant tunneling behavior. Such investigation is important for fabricating photoelectron mesoscopic devices.


2009 ◽  
Vol 247 (2) ◽  
pp. 335-341 ◽  
Author(s):  
Long Bai ◽  
Yang-Jin Wu ◽  
Baigeng Wang

2020 ◽  
Vol 102 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Kumar ◽  
C. Jennings ◽  
M. Scheibner ◽  
A. S. Bracker ◽  
S. G. Carter ◽  
...  

Entropy ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (10) ◽  
pp. 1003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cong Lee ◽  
Bing Dong ◽  
Xiao-Lin Lei

In this paper, we investigate the electronic transport properties of a quantum dot (QD) connected to two ferromagnetic leads and one superconducting lead in the Kondo regime by means of the finite-U slave boson mean field approach and the nonequilibrium Green function technique. In this three-terminal hybrid nanodevice, we focus our attention on the joint effects of the Kondo correlation, superconducting proximity pairing, and spin polarization of leads. It is found that the superconducting proximity effect will suppress the linear local conductance (LLC) stemming from the weakened Kondo peak, and when its coupling Γ s is bigger than the tunnel-coupling Γ of two normal leads, the linear cross conductance (LCC) becomes negative in the Kondo region. Regarding the antiparallel configuration, increasing spin polarization further suppresses LLC but enhances LCC, i.e., causing larger negative values of LCC, since it is beneficial for the emergence of cross Andreev reflection. On the contrary, for the parallel configuration, with increasing spin polarization, the LLC decreases and greatly widens with the appearance of shoulders, and eventually splits into four peaks, while the LCC decreases relatively rapidly to the normal conductance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document