A Shorter Method of Calculating Lennard‐Jones (12–6) Potential Parameters from Gas Viscosity Data

1961 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 1534-1534 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. A. Hawksworth
1977 ◽  
Vol 55 (16) ◽  
pp. 3007-3020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank M. Mourits ◽  
Frans H. A. Rummens

Published values for the potential parameters σ and ε/k of the Lennard–Jones (12–6) and Stockmayer (12–6–3) potentials as based on viscosity measurements are reviewed, with particular reference to the problem of indeterminacy inherent to such calculations. A number of correlation techniques, calibrated on viscosity-based potential parameters, are critically reviewed; where possible, priority rules for the use of these correlations have been developed. In addition, several other criteria (i.e. not based on viscosity data) for the acceptance or rejection of σ and ε/k parameter values are also discussed. Upon application of the various criteria and priority rules it has been possible to give recommended σ and ε/k parameter values for 75 molecules.


2010 ◽  
Vol 42 (12) ◽  
pp. 713-723 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucas A. J. Bastien ◽  
Phillip N. Price ◽  
Nancy J. Brown

1967 ◽  
Vol 45 (9) ◽  
pp. 2995-2997 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. S. Brown ◽  
G. K. Horton

Anharmonic contributions to the bulk moduli of Ne and Ar are calculated for Lennard-Jones (m–6) potentials and compared with the experimental results at T = 0 °K. We consider direct anharmonic contributions to the bulk moduli and the anharmonic contributions via the use of Brown's (1966) anharmonic potential parameters. Excellent agreement is found with the experimental results of Peterson, Batchelder, and Simmons (1966) and Batchelder, Losee, and Simmons (1967).We also study the effect of the anharmonic parameters on the Debye characteristic temperature obtained from Cν. Improved agreement with the experimental results is found.


1983 ◽  
Vol 61 (5) ◽  
pp. 664-670 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lakshman Pandey ◽  
C. P. K. Reddy ◽  
K. Lalita Sarkar

Proton spin-lattice relaxation times T1 were measured in mixtures of H2 with N2O as a function of density, composition, and temperature (200–400 K) in the region where [Formula: see text]. These data, along with the data obtained by Lalita and Bloom for H2–CO2, were interpreted, using Bloom–Oppenheim theory, to obtain the anisotropic intermoleeular potential parameters. Two models, (i) the Lennard–Jones (12–6) potential (LJP) and (ii) the modified Buckingham (exp-6) potential (MBP), were used to represent the isotropic part of the intermolecular potential. The relative anisotropy in the attractive r−6 term and the quadrupole moments of N2O and CO2 as obtained from MBP model are in better agreement with the values obtained from the polarizability data and the reported values, respectively, than those obtained from the LJP model.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document