Comparative Study of the Random‐Phase Approximation, Hartree‐Fock and Single Excited Configuration‐Interaction Methods of Computing Excitation Properties of Some Molecules

1972 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
pp. 1520-1528 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. C. Ho ◽  
G. A. Segal ◽  
H. S. Taylor
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Configuration Interaction ◽  
Random Phase Approximation ◽  
Random Phase ◽  
Excited Configuration ◽  
Phase Approximation ◽  
Hartree Fock

Random phase approximation in a deformed Hartree-Fock basis

1984 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 1113-1115 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Z. I. Gering ◽  
W. D. Heiss
Keyword(s):  
Random Phase Approximation ◽  
Random Phase ◽  
Phase Approximation ◽  
Hartree Fock

TENSOR EFFECTS IN PYGMY DIPOLE EXCITATION

2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (10) ◽  
pp. 2143-2151 ◽  
Author(s):  
ESRA YUKSEL ◽  
KUTSAL BOZKURT
Keyword(s):  
Random Phase Approximation ◽  
Random Phase ◽  
Nucleon Nucleon ◽  
Coupling Constants ◽  
Phase Approximation ◽  
Skyrme Interaction ◽  
Quasiparticle Random Phase Approximation ◽  
Tensor Coupling ◽  
Hartree Fock ◽  
Dipole Excitation

We investigate tensor effects in pygmy dipole excitations for the case of neutron-rich nuclei 68 Ni and 124 Sn using effective nucleon–nucleon Skyrme interaction. We use the Hartree–Fock–Bogoliubov (HFB) theory and employ the quasiparticle random phase approximation (QRPA). We calculate and compare the PDR and also GDR strength in the PDR–GDR energy region for QRPA calculations with and without tensor correlations. The most obvious results for the dipole excitations calculations are strongly dependent on the tensor terms. We see that the tensor correlations are more active at around 14–20 MeV , especially for the neutron-rich nuclei 68 Ni . We also compare the PDR calculations with their experimental results for the different proton–neutron tensor coupling constants.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document