Triple excitation effects in coupled-cluster calculations of indirect spin–spin coupling constants

2001 ◽  
Vol 115 (4) ◽  
pp. 1619-1622 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander A. Auer ◽  
Jürgen Gauss
Keyword(s):  
Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Coupling ◽  
Coupled Cluster ◽  
Cluster Calculations ◽  
Spin Coupling Constants ◽  
Triple Excitation ◽  
Spin Spin Coupling ◽  
Coupled Cluster Calculations

scholarly journals NMR parameters of FNNF as a test for coupled-cluster methods: CCSDT shielding and CC3 spin–spin coupling

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (37) ◽  
pp. 21350-21359
Author(s):  
Michał Jaszuński ◽  
Stephan P. A. Sauer ◽  
Rasmus Faber ◽  
David J. D. Wilson
Keyword(s):  
Ab Initio ◽  
Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Coupling ◽  
Coupled Cluster ◽  
Nmr Parameters ◽  
Coupled Cluster Methods ◽  
Quantitative Accuracy ◽  
Spin Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Spin Coupling ◽  
Cluster Methods

NMR shielding and spin–spin coupling constants of cis and trans isomers of FNNF have been determined to near-quantitative accuracy from ab initio calculations.

Do corresponding coupling constants in hydrogen-bonded homo- and hetero-chiral dimers differ?

2010 ◽  
Vol 88 (8) ◽  
pp. 694-699 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janet E. Del Bene ◽  
Ibon Alkorta ◽  
José Elguero
Keyword(s):  
Hydrogen Bonds ◽  
Ab Initio ◽  
Equation Of Motion ◽  
Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Coupling ◽  
Coupled Cluster ◽  
Absolute Value ◽  
Spin Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Spin Coupling ◽  
Isomeric Pairs

Ab initio equation-of-motion coupled cluster singles and doubles (EOM–CCSD) calculations have been carried out to evaluate spin–spin coupling constants in six pairs of homo- and hetero-chiral dimers: (HOOH)2, (H2NNH2)2, (FOOH)2, (FHNNH2)2, (HOOOH)2, and (FOOOH)2. Corresponding spin–spin coupling constants in these isomeric pairs of C2 and Ci symmetry may differ, but these differences are small and may not be detectable experimentally. For the complexes with O1–H···O and O1–H···F hydrogen bonds, 1J(O1–H) has a larger absolute value in the C2 isomer. For the same set of complexes, 1J(O1–O2) has a larger absolute value in the Ci isomer. No distinguishable patterns could be discerned in the remaining spin–spin coupling constants in the C2 and Ci isomers of these complexes, nor in complexes with N–H···N hydrogen bonds.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document