Closure to “Water Level Variations along California Coast”

1982 ◽  
Vol 108 (2) ◽  
pp. 227-227
Author(s):  
Raymond A. Smith
Keyword(s):  
Water Level ◽  
California Coast ◽  
Water Level Variations

Water Level Variations along California Coast

1980 ◽  
Vol 106 (3) ◽  
pp. 335-348
Author(s):  
Raymond A. Smith ◽  
Robert J. Leffler
Keyword(s):  
Water Level ◽  
California Coast ◽  
Water Level Variations

Presentation and assessment of tides and water level records for geophysical investigations

1970 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 607-625 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. C. Dohler ◽  
L. F. Ku
Keyword(s):  
Water Level ◽  
Power Spectra ◽  
Rate Of Change ◽  
Regression Technique ◽  
Level Data ◽  
Water Level Data ◽  
Geophysical Investigations ◽  
Water Level Variations ◽  
Mean Water Level ◽  
Change In Mean

The methods and problems involved in collecting water level data are explained, and the processing and formats of the data are illustrated. The trend of the change in mean water level is plotted and the corresponding rate of change is estimated by the regression technique. The power spectra of the water level variations are plotted to illustrate these variations in terms of frequencies.

scholarly journals Dynamics of fortnightly water level variations along a tide-dominated estuary with negligible river discharge

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erwan Garel ◽  
Ping Zhang ◽  
Huayang Cai
Keyword(s):  
Water Level ◽  
Phase Difference ◽  
River Discharge ◽  
Water Levels ◽  
Level Increase ◽  
Upstream Direction ◽  
Water Level Variations ◽  
Mean Water Level ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Guadiana Estuary

Abstract. Observations indicate that the fortnightly fluctuations in mean water level increase in amplitude along the lower half of a tide-dominated estuary (The Guadiana estuary) with negligible river discharge but remain constant upstream. Analytical solutions reproducing the semi-diurnal wave propagation shows that this pattern results from reflection effects at the estuary head. The phase difference between velocity and elevation increases from the mouth to the head (where the wave has a standing nature) as the high and low water levels get progressively closer to slack water. Thus, the tidal (flood-ebb) asymmetry in discharge is reduced in the upstream direction. It becomes negligible along the upper estuary half, as the mean sea level remains constant despite increased friction due to wave shoaling. Observations of a flat mean water level along a significant portion of an upper estuary, easier to obtain than the phase difference, can therefore indicate significant reflection of the propagating semi-diurnal wave at the head. Details of the analytical model shows that changes in the mean depth or length of semi-arid estuaries, in particular for macrotidal locations, affect the fortnightly tide amplitude, and thus the upstream mass transport and inundation regime. This has significant potential impacts on the estuarine environment.

scholarly journals Feedback Mechanism in Bifurcating River Systems: the Effect on Water-Level Sensitivity

Water ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 1915
Author(s):  
Matthijs R.A. Gensen ◽  
Jord J. Warmink ◽  
Fredrik Huthoff ◽  
Suzanne J.M.H. Hulscher
Keyword(s):  
Water Level ◽  
Flood Risk ◽  
River System ◽  
Feedback Mechanism ◽  
Water Levels ◽  
River Systems ◽  
Water Level Variations ◽  
System Water ◽  
Discharge Distribution ◽  
Single Branch

Accurate and reliable estimates of water levels are essential to assess flood risk in river systems. In current practice, uncertainties involved and the sensitivity of water levels to these uncertainties are studied in single-branch rivers, while many rivers in deltas consist of multiple distributaries. In a bifurcating river, a feedback mechanism exists between the downstream water levels and the discharge distribution at the bifurcation. This paper aims to quantify the sensitivity of water levels to main channel roughness in a bifurcating river system. Water levels are modelled for various roughness scenarios under a wide range of discharge conditions using a one-dimensional hydraulic model. The results show that the feedback mechanism reduces the sensitivity of water levels to local changes of roughness in comparison to the single-branch river. However, in the smaller branches of the system, water-level variations induced by the changes in discharge distribution can exceed the water-level variations of the single-branch river. Therefore, water levels throughout the entire system are dominated by the conditions in the largest branch. As the feedback mechanism is important, the river system should be considered as one interconnected system in river maintenance of rivers, flood-risk analyses, and future planning of river engineering works.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document