scholarly journals Erratum for “Project Delivery Systems for Construction Projects”

1977 ◽  
Vol 103 (2) ◽  
pp. 307-307
Author(s):  
Kenath A. Kettle
2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 276-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bingsheng Liu ◽  
Bin Xue ◽  
Tengfei Huo ◽  
Geoffrey Shen ◽  
Meiqing Fu

Project delivery systems (PDSs) selection is crucial to construction project management success. The matching between construction projects and PDSs is hypersensitive to project external environment. Existing studies on selecting PDSs mainly focus on owner’s and project’s characteristics and attach less attention to project environmental factors. This study, therefore, aims to formally identify key project external environmental factors affecting PDSs selection using a data-driven approach. Key factors are summarized and identified through the granular computing method based on 61 Chinese project samples. Empirical results indicate that four factors including market competitiveness, technology accessibility, material availability, and regulatory impact are critical to PDSs selection. This study extended previous research findings on PDSs selection from a perspective of project external environments. Research conclusions can be used as references underpinning construction owners selecting appropriate PDSs considering project external environmental factors.


Facilities ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (5/6) ◽  
pp. 339-349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikko Kantola ◽  
Arto Saari

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to identify the risks and challenges related to the change in building construction projects to the European Union (EU) zero-energy building (nZEB) decree in the year 2020. Another goal was to create solutions to those risks and challenges. Design/methodology/approach A workshop method was chosen to gather up-to-date information from the construction cluster in Finland. Findings In the workshop, the main concern was the level of knowledge and know-how with all the parties working with construction projects. As an answer to this challenge, serious and substantial education in the organisations and competence requirements for designers and piloting as much as possible in the next few years was offered. Commissioning consultant was also seen as vital for nZEB project. Tight schedules and unfit project delivery systems were also seen as a risk for nZEB projects. However, modern project delivery systems were seen to be problematic in practice even if they were functional in theory. Originality/value The results of the workshop are valuable for all parties working with building construction projects in Finland and the whole EU area.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 269-280
Author(s):  
Ahmed Nouh Meshref ◽  
E.A. Elkasaby ◽  
Omnia Wageh

Abstract No doubt that the most vital issues to achieve a great success project are the choice of best suitable project delivery methods. According to the experience of project management staff, the delivery of the project is chosen. However, that leads to similar repetitive issues, for example, exceeding the cost of the project and exceeding the project's schedule, and that's what many projects face. It is difficult to develop the management of the recurring issues of the project because there is no awareness of delivery methods. The efficiency of project implementation is greatly affected by selecting the appropriate delivery method. Fuzzy data at early stages of construction projects leads to the fuzzy decision of selection a suitable type to deliver the project contract. In this study, the main purpose was to determine the comprehensive criteria that significantly influence the selection of infrastructures construction project delivery systems. These criteria will aid decision making process more comprehensive and effective innovation tool to choose the reliable Infrastructures Project Delivery System.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document