The Low Impact Design Charrette: Engaging the Public and Expanding Green Stormwater Management in San Francisco

Author(s):  
Rosey Jencks ◽  
Scott Durbin ◽  
Kerry McWalter
Author(s):  
Thomas A. Norton ◽  
Melissa Ruhl ◽  
Tim Armitage ◽  
Brian Matthews ◽  
John Miles

The development of autonomous vehicles (AVs) is advancing quickly in some enclaves around the world. Consequently, AVs exist in the public consciousness, featuring regularly in mainstream media. As the form and function of AVs emerge, the attitudes of potential users become more important. The extent to which the public trusts AV technology and anticipates benefits, will drive consumer willingness to use AVs. Broadly, public attitudes will determine whether AVs can attract public investment in infrastructure and become a feature of the future transport mix or fail to realize the potential their developers assert. As part of UK Autodrive, a program trialing the introduction of AVs in the United Kingdom, researchers conducted focus groups in five UK cities, and a comparison focus group in San Francisco (December 2017 to September 2018) using representative samples (total n = 137). Focus group facilitators guided discussions in three areas considered central to usage decisions: trust in the technology, ownership models, and community benefit. This paper describes findings from a quasi-quantitative study supported with qualitative insights. This research provides three key takeaways centering on trust in the technology and in delivering benefit. First, some participants gain trust through experience and others through evidence. Second, participants had difficulty discriminating between AV developers, indicating a need for industry cooperation. Third, partnerships were found to demonstrate trust, highlighting the need for more and deeper partnerships moving forward. Generally, participants had positive attitudes toward AVs and expect AVs to provide benefits. However, these attitudes and expectations could change as AV development progresses.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1950 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 145-146
Author(s):  
EDWARD B. SHAW

The President and the Executive Board send their greetings to the membership of the Academy of Pediatrics for the new year. This column will appear irregularly from time to time in an effort to keep the membership apprised of developments which affect the Academy and which must be considered by the Executive Board. The President and the District Chairmen are elective officers of the Academy and in the true sense of democratic representation can only attempt to interpret the opinions of the membership in their action on problems which arise. American medicine is now confronted with many problems upon which neither the individual nor the organization can avoid taking a position. The action of your executive officers must be predicated upon the expression of opinion by the membership. It is hoped that you will keep your officers informed of individual and group opinions upon controversial issues in order to guide their action. The columns of Pediatrics IATRICS are open to the membership in "The Pediatrician and the Public" but it is most desirable that you communicate with your officers directly for their information. The San Francisco session was astonishingly well attended considering the handicap which distance imposed upon many of the members. I should be remiss in not expressing the pleasure of the local Fellows that so many should have come so far and contributed so much. Dr. Edgar E. Martmer and his Program Committee are to be congratulated not only because of the excellence of the program but also because they were able to effect last minute substitutions for participants who, because of illness, were unable to attend, without impairing the structure of the meeting.


Author(s):  
Sean Parson

Chapter 4 discusses Mayor Frank Jordan’s (1992–1995) revanchist Matrix Quality of Life Program, which sought to enforce a broken-windows policing system in San Francisco. The impact of the policy was felt largely by the visible homeless in downtown San Francisco, who were regularly harassed and arrested by the police and forced out of the city. Because quality-of-life policing desires to sanitize the public space of disruptive and asocial behaviour, the public meals of Food Not Bombs near City Hall resisted the city’s attempt to criminalize homelessness. This chapter argues that the city attempted to construct the homeless as anti-citizens and exclude them from the political and physical spaces of the city.


Pharmacy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca H. Stone ◽  
Sally Rafie ◽  
Dennia Ernest ◽  
Brielle Scutt

Pharmacists are often the primary source of emergency contraception (EC) access and patient information. This study aims to identify differences in pharmacist-reported EC access and counseling between states which do or do not permit pharmacist-prescribed EC. This prospective, mystery caller study was completed in California (CA), which permits pharmacist-prescribed EC after completion of continuing education, and Georgia (GA), which does not. All community pharmacies that were open to the public in San Diego and San Francisco, CA, and Atlanta, GA were called by researchers who posed as adult females inquiring about EC via a structured script. Primary endpoints were EC availability and counseling. Statistical analyses completed with SPSS. Researchers called 395 pharmacies, 98.2% were reached and included. Regarding levonorgestrel (LNG), CA pharmacists more frequently discussed (CA 90.4% vs. GA 81.2%, p = 0.02), stocked (CA 89.5% vs. GA 67.8%, p < 0.01), and correctly indicated it “will work” or “will work but may be less effective” 4 days after intercourse (CA 67.5% vs. GA 17.5%, p < 0.01). Ulipristal was infrequently discussed (CA 22.6% vs. GA 3.4%, p < 0.01) and rarely stocked (CA 9.6% vs. GA 0.7%, p < 0.01). Pharmacists practicing in states which permit pharmacist-prescribed EC with completion of required continuing education may be associated with improved patient access to oral EC and more accurate patient counseling.


2005 ◽  
Vol 32 (supplement) ◽  
pp. S11-S18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey D. Klausner ◽  
Charlotte K. Kent ◽  
William Wong ◽  
Jacque McCright ◽  
Mitchell H. Katz

1910 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 589-601 ◽  
Author(s):  
George W. McCoy

The United States has been fortunate in never having had any extensive epidemics of plague. With the exception of a few cases, not over a dozen, that are directly chargeable to the infection of the indigenous rodents (ground squirrels), the disease has been confined to the two largest and most important cities on the Pacific Coast, San Francisco and Seattle. In each city the disease has yielded promptly to vigorous sanitary measures carried out by the public health arm of the Federal Government. Under the political organization of the Government, direct control of measures for the suppression of a disease is taken by the central sanitary authority only when a request is made by the local authorities, but it has been the experience that local authorities are prompt to make requests for assistance whenever any serious epidemic appears.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document