Design of the ICD-10 Field Trial in German-Speaking Countries

1990 ◽  
Vol 23 (S 4) ◽  
pp. 142-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Dilling ◽  
H. Freyberger ◽  
C. Malchow
Keyword(s):  
Field Trial ◽  
German Speaking ◽  
Icd 10

Design of the ICD-10 Field Trial of the Diagnostic Criteria for Research in German-Speaking Countries

1996 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 260-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.-D. Stieglitz ◽  
H.J. Freyberger ◽  
C.P. Malchow ◽  
H. Dilling
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
Field Trial ◽  
German Speaking ◽  
Icd 10

ICD-10 Field Trial in German-Speaking Countries - Summary of the Quantitative Empirical Results

1990 ◽  
Vol 23 (S 4) ◽  
pp. 192-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Freyberger ◽  
M. Albus ◽  
R Stieglitz
Keyword(s):  
Field Trial ◽  
Empirical Results ◽  
German Speaking ◽  
Icd 10

ICD-10 Field Trial in German-Speaking Countries - Summary, Judgement and Perspectives

1990 ◽  
Vol 23 (S 4) ◽  
pp. 202-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Dittmann ◽  
H. Freyberger ◽  
M. Albus ◽  
B. Blanz ◽  
M. Cranach ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Field Trial ◽  
German Speaking ◽  
Icd 10

Field Trials of the 1987 Draft of Chapter V (F) of ICD-10

1988 ◽  
Vol 152 (S1) ◽  
pp. 33-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jack D. Burke
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
Study Design ◽  
Field Trial ◽  
Developmental Disorders ◽  
International Classification Of Diseases ◽  
Field Trials ◽  
Classification Of Diseases ◽  
Icd 10

IntroductionThis paper will review the major objectives and study design of the Field Trials of the draft chapter on Mental Behavioural and Developmental Disorders in the tenth revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10), now in preparation. The text used in this Field Trial is the Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines, which is more elaborate than the Short Glossary for this chapter that will be published in the main volume of ICD-10. The text for the former will be published together with the Diagnostic Criteria for Research and other parts of the WHO family of instruments relevant to mental health.

Feasibility, Suitability, and Interrater Reliability of ICD-10 During Different Stages of the ICD-10 Field Trial

1990 ◽  
Vol 23 (S 4) ◽  
pp. 188-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Stieglitz ◽  
M. Zaudig ◽  
H. Freyberger ◽  
V. Dittmann
Keyword(s):  
Field Trial ◽  
Interrater Reliability ◽  
Icd 10

Assessing the opinions and experiences of German-speaking psychiatrists regarding necessary changes for the 11th revision of the mental disorders chapter of the international classification of disorders (ICD-11)

2010 ◽  
Vol 25 (8) ◽  
pp. 437-442 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Zielasek ◽  
H.J. Freyberger ◽  
M. Jänner ◽  
H.P. Kapfhammer ◽  
N. Sartorius ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Disorders ◽  
Attention Deficit Disorder ◽  
Goodness Of Fit ◽  
Diagnostic Category ◽  
International Classification ◽  
Free Text ◽  
Diagnostic Categories ◽  
German Speaking ◽  
Icd 10

AbstractWe performed an Internet-based questionnaire survey of the opinions of German-speaking psychiatrists regarding the experiences with the 10th revision of the international classification of mental disorders (chapter F of ICD-10). We received 304 completed questionnaires including more than 500 free-text comments. The responding group was characterized by professionally experienced middle-aged psychiatrists. German-speaking psychiatrists were comparatively content with ICD-10. Most diagnostic categories received a “satisfied” or “very satisfied” rating by the majority of respondents. Negative “goodness of fit” ratings – a possible indicator of the need for revision – were not higher than 50% for any category. Based on free-text entries, neurasthenia was the single diagnostic category most often suggested for deletion in ICD-11. Changes were considered necessary mainly for dementias and personality disorders. Adult attention deficit disorder and narcissistic personality disorder were the two diagnostic categories most frequently suggested to be added as new categories. This study provides valuable information related to perceived clinical utility of the classification, though with a narrow sample. Information about clinicians’ experiences should be combined with scientific evidence for the revision process of ICD-11.

The perspective of German-speaking Countries for the Future work to Develop ICD-11

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (S1) ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
W. Gaebel
Keyword(s):  
Mental Disorders ◽  
Scientific Evidence ◽  
World Health Organisation ◽  
World Health ◽  
Additional Information ◽  
German Speaking ◽  
Icd 10 ◽  
Partnership Network ◽  
Future Work

In the course of the revision of the International Classification of Mental Disorders (currently 10th revision, hence ICD-10), an international scientific partnership network group was founded by the World Health Organisation (Chair: N. Sartorius, Geneva) in order to review the international scientific evidence of putative significance for the revision of ICD-10 in different language areas.In the course of this project we reviewed several areas of activity that may be of importance for the review process to develop ICD-11. First of all, general questions arise about how a psychiatric classification system should be organized. Will it still depend on classical psychopathological information with additional information from imaging, genetic and laboratory studies, and finally the patient history? An alternative approach is based on functional psychopathology be based on functional neural modules which represent functional activities of the human brain and their disturbances in mental disorders. Another area of debate is whether dimensions rather than categories shall lay a new foundation for the classification of mental disorders. A further issue arises when considering narrative elements of psychiatric history taking. In how far can or should such factors be integrated? All these questions are interwoven with the classical German contributions to psychiatric nosology by Kraepelin and Bleuler, which will be reassessed on the background of these current topics in revising ICD-10.

Results of the ICD-10 Research Criteria Study in German-Speaking Countries in the Field of Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy

1996 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 306-314
Author(s):  
Wolfgang Schneider ◽  
Harold J. Freyberger ◽  
Aribert Muhs ◽  
G. Schüssler
Keyword(s):  
German Speaking ◽  
Icd 10 ◽  
Research Criteria
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document