scholarly journals Carotid Disease: Medical, Surgical, and Endovascular Treatment

2001 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 0097-0116
Author(s):  
Keith D. Calligaro ◽  
William H. Baker ◽  
Barry T. Katzen ◽  
Irene M. Meissner ◽  
Christopher Zarins
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Carotid Disease

Carotid Disease: Medical, Surgical, and Endovascular Treatment

2001 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-115
Author(s):  
K. D. Calligaro ◽  
W. H. Baker ◽  
B. T. Katzen ◽  
I. M. Meissner ◽  
C. Zarins
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Carotid Disease

Early Carotid Disease Seen in Type 1 Diabeties

2011 ◽  
Vol 44 (13) ◽  
pp. 34-35
Author(s):  
DOUG BRUNK
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Disease

Current evidence and prospects for medical treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms

VASA ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 217-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diehm ◽  
Schmidli ◽  
Dai-Do ◽  
Baumgartner
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Medical Treatment ◽  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Significant Morbidity ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
Risk Of Rupture

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a potentially fatal condition with risk of rupture increasing as maximum AAA diameter increases. It is agreed upon that open surgical or endovascular treatment is indicated if maximum AAA diameter exceeds 5 to 5.5cm. Continuing aneurysmal degeneration of aortoiliac arteries accounts for significant morbidity, especially in patients undergoing endovascular AAA repair. Purpose of this review is to give an overview of the current evidence of medical treatment of AAA and describe prospects of potential pharmacological approaches towards prevention of aneurysmal degeneration of small AAAs and to highlight possible adjunctive medical treatment approaches after open surgical or endovascular AAA therapy.

Anticoagulation in addition to dual antiplatelet therapy has no impact on long-term follow-up after endovascular treatment of (sub)acute lower limb ischemia

VASA ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 321-329
Author(s):  
Mariya Kronlage ◽  
Erwin Blessing ◽  
Oliver J. Müller ◽  
Britta Heilmeier ◽  
Hugo A. Katus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Limb Ischemia ◽  
Bleeding Complications ◽  
Severe Bleeding ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

Summary. Background: To assess the impact of short- vs. long-term anticoagulation in addition to standard dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) upon endovascular treatment of (sub)acute thrombembolic occlusions of the lower extremity. Patient and methods: Retrospective analysis was conducted on 202 patients with a thrombembolic occlusion of lower extremities, followed by crirical limb ischemia that received endovascular treatment including thrombolysis, mechanical thrombectomy, or a combination of both between 2006 and 2015 at a single center. Following antithrombotic regimes were compared: 1) dual antiplatelet therapy, DAPT for 4 weeks (aspirin 100 mg/d and clopidogrel 75 mg/d) upon intervention, followed by a lifelong single antiplatelet therapy; 2) DAPT plus short term anticoagulation for 4 weeks, followed by a lifelong single antiplatelet therapy; 3) DAPT plus long term anticoagulation for > 4 weeks, followed by a lifelong anticoagulation. Results: Endovascular treatment was associated with high immediate revascularization (> 98 %), as well as overall and amputation-free survival rates (> 85 %), independent from the chosen anticoagulation regime in a two-year follow up, p > 0.05. Anticoagulation in addition to standard antiplatelet therapy had no significant effect on patency or freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR) 24 months upon index procedure for both thrombotic and embolic occlusions. Severe bleeding complications occurred more often in the long-term anticoagulation group (9.3 % vs. 5.6 % (short-term group) and 6.5 % (DAPT group), p > 0.05). Conclusions: Our observational study demonstrates that the choice of an antithrombotic regime had no impact on the long-term follow-up after endovascular treatment of acute thrombembolic limb ischemia whereas prolonged anticoagulation was associated with a nominal increase in severe bleeding complications.

Gender differences in abdominal aortic aneurysm therapy – a systematic review

VASA ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 267-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Konstanze Stoberock ◽  
Tilo Kölbel ◽  
Gülsen Atlihan ◽  
Eike Sebastian Debus ◽  
Nikolaos Tsilimparis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gender Differences ◽  
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Lower Survival Rate ◽  
Lower Survival ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
Risk Of Rupture

Abstract. This article analyses if and to what extent gender differences exist in abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) therapy. For this purpose Medline (PubMed) was searched from January 1999 to January 2018. Keywords were: “abdominal aortic aneurysm”, “gender”, “prevalence”, “EVAR”, and “open surgery of abdominal aortic aneurysm”. Regardless of open or endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms, women have a higher rate of complications and longer hospitalizations compared to men. The majority of studies showed that women have a lower survival rate for surgical and endovascular treatment of abdominal aneurysms after both elective and emergency interventions. Women receive less surgical/interventional and protective medical treatment. Women seem to have a higher risk of rupture, a lower survival rate in AAA, and a higher rate of complications, regardless of endovascular or open treatment. The gender differences may be due to a higher age of women at diagnosis and therapy associated with higher comorbidity, but also because of genetic, hormonal, anatomical, biological, and socio-cultural differences. Strategies for treatment in female patients must be further defined to optimize outcome.

Hybrid treatment of multilevel revascularization in patients with peripheral arterial disease – a multi-centre study in Korea

VASA ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 235-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soon Cheon Lee ◽  
Jin Hyun Joh ◽  
Jeong-Hwan Chang ◽  
Hyung-Kee Kim ◽  
Jang Yong Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Combined Treatment ◽  
Ankle Brachial Index ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Limb Ischaemia ◽  
University Hospitals ◽  
Multi Centre Study ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Hybrid Treatment

Abstract. Background: Endovascular treatment is an alternative first-line management for peripheral artery disease (PAD). Hybrid treatment (HT) is defined as a combined treatment for patients with PAD using endovascular and open surgery, simultaneously performed in an operating room. The results of HT are reportedly good for multilevel revascularization (MR) in patients with chronic limb ischaemia, and even in older high-risk patients. The goal of this study was to examine the clinical and haemodynamic outcomes of HT in patients who need MR. Patients and methods: Nine university hospitals in Korea participated in this multicentre study. A total of 134 patients with multilevel PAD underwent HT and MR. Patients were enrolled from July 2014 to June 2015 and were followed for 18 months. Results: The mean age of the patients was 68.8 ± 9.93 years and 88.1 % were men. Patients with Rutherford category 2 to 3 and 4 to 6 comprised 59.0 % and 42.0 % of the group, respectively. The technical success rate was 100 %. The primary patency rates at 12 and 18 months were 77.6 % and 63.9 %, respectively. The primary-assisted patency rates at 12 and 18 months were both 90.0 %. The pre-operative mean ankle brachial index (0.43 ± 0.23) increased to 0.87 ± 0.23 at six months post-operatively (t-test, p < 0.05). The amputation free survival rate was 97.1 %. Conclusions: Although outcomes of multilevel PAD are reportedly poor when endovascular treatment alone is used, we have shown that HT is a feasible alternative modality for patients with multilevel PAD, with satisfactory amputation-free survival and freedom from re-intervention rates.

A carotid bifurcation pseudoaneurysm treated endovascularly in a patient with irradiated neck

VASA ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 193-195
Author(s):  
Christiana Anastasiadou ◽  
Chrisostomos Maltezos ◽  
George Galyfos ◽  
Sotirios Giannakakis ◽  
Nikos Zannes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Carotid Bifurcation ◽  
Rare Entity ◽  
Artery Pseudoaneurysm

Abstract. A carotid artery pseudoaneurysm in an irradiated neck is a rare entity with possible devastating results and management should be multidisciplinary. We present a successful endovascular treatment of a late carotid artery pseudoaneurysm following patch endarterectomy and cervical radiotherapy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document