Incidence of Neurapraxia in Digital Nerve Injuries

2000 ◽  
Vol Volume 16 (Number 2) ◽  
pp. 0095-0100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aamir Siddiqui ◽  
Charles I. Benjamin ◽  
Warren Schubert
Keyword(s):  
2011 ◽  
Vol 127 ◽  
pp. 100
Author(s):  
KT Magge ◽  
MD de la Lama ◽  
JK Kessler ◽  
HU Umans ◽  
RL Liebling

Author(s):  
Slađana Anđelković ◽  
Aleksandar Lesic ◽  
Marko Bumbasirevic ◽  
Lukas Rasulic

2014 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 608-613 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. R. Thomas ◽  
R. J. Saunders ◽  
K. R. Means

Our purpose was to determine whether there was a significant difference in sensory recovery after digital nerve repair using loupe magnification or an operating microscope. We identified patients aged 21–75 who had primary proper digital nerve repairs at least 24 months before our study. A total of 12 patients with 13 digital nerve injuries repaired with loupe magnification and nine patients with 12 digital nerve injuries repaired using the operating microscope, agreed to return for assessment by a therapist blinded to treatment. We found no significant difference in sensory recovery between the two groups as measured by static two-point discrimination, moving two-point discrimination, and Semmes–Weinstein monofilament. There were also no significant differences in average Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand or visual analogue pain scores. Level of evidence: IV


Injury ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 233-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.P. Roberts ◽  
D.B. Allan

2011 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
pp. 519-524 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leandro Pretto Flores

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the results of a double nerve transfer at the level of the hand for recovery of the motor and sensory function of the hand in cases of high ulnar nerve injuries. METHOD: Five patients underwent a transfer of the distal branch of the anterior interosseous nerve to the deep ulnar nerve, and an end-to-side suture of the superficial ulnar nerve to the third common palmar digital nerve. RESULTS: Two patients recovered strength M3 and three cases were graded as M4; recovery of protective sensation (S3+ in three patients and S4 in two) was observed in the fourth and fifth fingers, and at the hypothenar region. The monofilament test showed values of 3.61 or less in all cases and the two-point discrimination test demonstrated values of 7 mm in three cases and 5 mm in two. CONCLUSION: This technique of double nerve transfer is effective for motor and sensory recovery of the distal ulnar-innervated side of the hand.


Author(s):  
Yoshimi Endo ◽  
Thiru Sivakumaran ◽  
Susan C. Lee ◽  
Bin Lin ◽  
Duretti Fufa

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document