scholarly journals United States Pharmacopeia Safety Review of Willow Bark

Planta Medica ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 85 (16) ◽  
pp. 1192-1202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hellen A. Oketch-Rabah ◽  
Robin J. Marles ◽  
Scott A. Jordan ◽  
Tieraona Low Dog

AbstractWillow bark (Salix spp.) is an ingredient in some dietary supplements. No serious adverse effects were reported from trials of willow bark extracts delivering 120 – 240 mg salicin (the purported active constituent) daily for up to 8 weeks. All studies involved adults only; none involved special subpopulations such as pregnant or breastfeeding women, or children. The most common adverse effects associated with willow bark are gastrointestinal; a few allergic reactions were also reported. Some publications advise caution when taking willow bark. There is a risk of increased bleeding in vulnerable individuals, salicylates cross the placenta and are eliminated slowly in newborns, some persons are sensitive or allergic to aspirin, and children are at risk of Reye syndrome. Concurrent use with other salicylate-containing medicines increases these risks. Metabolism of 240 mg salicin from willow bark could yield 113 mg of salicylic acid, yet dietary supplement products are not required to be labeled with warnings. In contrast, over-the-counter low-dose aspirin (81 mg strength), which delivers 62 mg salicylic acid, is required by law to include cautions, warnings, and contraindications related to its use in pregnant and nursing women, children, and other vulnerable subpopulations, e.g., those using anticoagulants. In the interest of protecting public health, the United States Pharmacopeia has included a cautionary labeling statement in the United States Pharmacopeia Salix Species monograph as follows: “Dosage forms prepared with this article should bear the following statement: ‘Not for use in children, women who are pregnant or nursing, or by persons with known sensitivity to aspirin.’”

1985 ◽  
Vol 53 (01) ◽  
pp. 116-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
R E Merton ◽  
A D Curtis ◽  
D P Thomas

SummaryHeparin samples from five manufacturers were assayed by the revised British Pharmacopoeia (BP) heparin assay and the results compared with those obtained using the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) assay. The United States Pharmacopeia (USP) reference heparin preparation and the 4th International Standard (IS) for heparin were also assayed by the two methods relative to the 3rd IS. The results obtained by the revised BP assay were in close agreement with those obtained by the APTT assay for all the heparins that were tested. The assays revealed that there is at least a 10% discrepancy between the International Unit for heparin and the USP unit.


1994 ◽  
Vol 77 (3) ◽  
pp. 756-757 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Chernomorsky

Abstract The reliability of the currently used quantitative assay for commercially available chlorophyllin copper complex is discussed. It was shown that optical measurements at 405 nm can overestimate the purity of the preparation by 16.4–49.5%. This conclusion is from comparative studies using spectrophotometry at 405 nm and elemental analysis (copper content) of chlorophyllin copper complex. Spectrophotometry at 630 nm resulted in closer agreement with data calculated from elemental analysis. These observations have to be taken into consideration by those involved in the manufacture and distribution of chlorophyllin copper complex as well as in the development of the United States Pharmacopeia compendial monograph for this preparation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document