SGLT-2 Inhibitors and DPP-4 Inhibitors as Second-Line Drugs in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

2018 ◽  
Vol 50 (10) ◽  
pp. 768-777 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keke Wang ◽  
Yansong Zhang ◽  
Chunyang Zhao ◽  
Mingyan Jiang

AbstractSodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors are both novel and second-line therapies in type 2 diabetes mellitus, yet no well-rounded comparison of these two drugs has been published. Upon searching randomized controlled trials in databases from inception to July 2018, we collected studies on the efficacy or safety of SGLT-2 inhibitors compared with those of DPP-4 inhibitors for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. A total of 12 randomized controlled studies including 4342 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with DPP-4 inhibitors, SGLT-2 inhibitors achieved greater reductions in HbA1c (SMD –0.22; 95% CI: –0.30, –0.14; p=0.000) and fasting plasma glucose (SMD –0.48; 95% CI: –0.56, –0.41; p=0.000). In addition, these reductions increased with a prolonged treatment duration from 12 to 78 weeks. Geographically, significant reductions of SGLT-2 inhibitors in HbA1c and FPG were found in North America and Europe, but not in Asia. Furthermore, SGLT-2 inhibitors showed greater reductions in body weight (SMD −0.72; 95% CI: –0.81, –0.63; p=0.000) from baseline, with an increased incidence of genital infections (OR 4.49; 95% CI: 2.96, 6.83; p=0.000) and pollakiuria (OR 2.24; 95% CI: 1.05, 4.79; p=0.037) and a decreased incidence of hypertension and hyperglycemia. Overall, the current meta-analysis demonstrated that compared to DPP-4 inhibitors, SGLT-2 inhibitors have beneficial effects on HbA1c, FPG, body weight, SBP, DBP, and HDL-cholesterol in patients with type 2 diabetes. However, SGLT-2 inhibitors are associated with increased total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol and a higher incidence of genital infections and pollakiuria.

2016 ◽  
Vol 129 (3) ◽  
pp. 382-392 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Devi ◽  
Ghanshyam Mali ◽  
Indrani Chakraborty ◽  
Mazhuvancherry Kesavan Unnikrishnan ◽  
Suhaj Abdulsalim

Foods ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 1540
Author(s):  
Chen Wang ◽  
Chengcheng Zhang ◽  
Sijia Li ◽  
Leilei Yu ◽  
Fengwei Tian ◽  
...  

The effectiveness of probiotic consumption in controlling dyslipidemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has been unclear. We reviewed relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to clarify the effect of probiotic intake on dyslipidemia in T2DM patients. The Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed and Cochrane Library databases were used for searching relevant RCTs published up to October 2020. The total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) concentrations were selected as the primary indicators for dyslipidemia. The results of 13 eligible RCTs showed that probiotic intake could significantly reduce TC (SMD: −0.23, 95% CI: (−0.37, −0.10)) and TG (SMD: −0.27, 95% CI: (−0.44, −0.11)) levels, but did not regulate LDL-C or HDL-C concentrations. Subgroup analysis showed that multispecies probiotics (≥two species), but not single-species probiotics, significantly decreased TC and TG concentrations. Furthermore, powder, but not liquid, probiotics could reduce TC and TG concentrations. This meta-analysis demonstrated that probiotic supplementation is helpful in reducing TC and TG concentrations in T2DM patients. However, more well-controlled trials are needed to clarify the benefits of probiotics on dyslipidemia in T2DM patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document