Scaphoid AARIF: Arthroscopically assisted reduction and internal fixation of scaphoid fractures

2001 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 192-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.Greg Sommerkamp
Keyword(s):  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Scaphoid Fractures ◽  
Arthroscopically Assisted ◽  
Arthroscopically Assisted Reduction

Arthroscopically Assisted Treatment of Volar Rim Fractures

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillaume Herzberg ◽  
Marion Burnier ◽  
Lyliane Ly
Keyword(s):  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Flexor Tendon ◽  
Open Reduction Internal Fixation ◽  
Direct Access ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Volar Approach ◽  
Arthroscopically Assisted ◽  
Window Approach ◽  
Arthroscopically Assisted Reduction ◽  
Dual Window

Abstract Background Arthroscopically-assisted reduction and internal fixation (AARIF) for distal radius fractures (DRF) has been extensively described. Little information is available about AARIF in AO “B3” and “C” DRF with displaced lunate facet volar rim fragment (VRF) and volar carpal subluxation. However, lunate volar rim fragment (LVRF) may be very difficult to reduce and fix under arthroscopic control using the flexor carpi radialis (FCR) or FCR extended approaches while traction is applied. Purposes The aims were to describe our surgical technique of AARIF of partial or complete DRF with VRF and provide information about how often this technique may be necessary, based on a large DRF database. Methods The dual-window volar approach for complete articular AO C DRF with volar medial fragment was described in 2012 for performing open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). Since 2015, we have used the dual-window approach for AARIF of “B3” or “C” DRF with volar carpal subluxation. We analyzed our PAF database, searching for patients treated with AARIF in “B3” and “C” fractures. Results The dual-window volar approach is very useful when using AARIF for AO “B3” and “C” DRF with displaced VRF and volar carpal subluxation. The anteromedial part of the exposure allows a direct access to reduction and fixation of the LVRF under traction and arthroscopic control. Overall, 1% of all articular DRF in this series showed a displaced LVRF amenable to the dual-window volar approach. Conclusion It is almost impossible to access and properly fix a VRF using traction and arthroscopic control through the FCR or FCR extended FCR approach because of the stretched flexor tendon mass. The use of the dual-window approach during AARIF of AO “B3” or “C” DRF has not previously been reported. Displaced VRF are rare whether they were part of “B3” or “C” fractures. If AARIF is chosen, we strongly recommend the use of the dual-window volar approach for AO “B3” and “C” fractures with VRF. A single anteromedial approach can also be used for isolated “B3” anteromedial DRF.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document