Development of a nondestructive compliance test for resilient denture liners

2001 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-96
Author(s):  
Igor J. Pesun ◽  
Anamaria Villar ◽  
James S. Hodges ◽  
Ralph DeLong ◽  
Juey H. Lai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
1974 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 178-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
James E. Immekus ◽  
Mohamed Aramany

BDJ ◽  
1973 ◽  
Vol 135 (2) ◽  
pp. 55-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
W H Douglas ◽  
D M Walker

1991 ◽  
Vol 65 (4) ◽  
pp. 528-532 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce S. Graham ◽  
Derek W. Jones ◽  
Joanne Burke ◽  
J. Peter Thompson
Keyword(s):  

Odontology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 106 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pinar Altinci ◽  
Murat Mutluay ◽  
Eva Söderling ◽  
Arzu Tezvergil-Mutluay

1982 ◽  
pp. 307-309
Author(s):  
L. Gettleman ◽  
C. Farris ◽  
R. LeBoeuf ◽  
H. Rawls ◽  
E. Dillingham
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 252-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maurício Malheiros Badaró ◽  
Vanessa Maria Fagundes Leite-Fernandes ◽  
Luciano Trevisan Martin ◽  
Viviane de Cássia Oliveira ◽  
Evandro Watanabe ◽  
...  

Abstract The disadvantage of liners materials is the difficulty of biofilm control. It was compared an experimental dentifrice contained Ricinus communis, with commercials dentifrices as antibiofilm activity against microorganisms on denture liner. Six hundred specimens were distributed in 5 groups (n=18/ microorganism): water; experimental dentifrice; specific dentifrice for denture and two conventional dentifrices against C. albicans; C. glabrata; S. mutans; S. aureus; E. coli. Each group had a negative (n=5; without contamination) and positive control (n=15/ microorganism; without cleaning). The antibiofilm activity was evaluated by the method of biofilm formation in triplicate. The specimens were contaminated in a standard way and incubated. After that, manual brushing was performed (60 s), washed with PBS, immersed in liquid culture medium for resuspension and sowing in solid medium. The results (mean of triplicates) were expressed in CFU/mL. The data was submitted to Shapiro-Wilk, ANOVA and Tukey test (p<0.05). The specific dentifrice (1.27±1.20) was the most effective against S. mutans, followed by conventional (Trihydral, 3.13±0.88; Colgate, 2.16±2.02) and experimental (3.81±1.37) dentifrices, which were similar to each other (p=0.008). All of them were different from water (4.79±1.42). The specific (0.21±0.21) and experimental (0.36±0.25) dentifrices were similar against S. aureus, with a higher mean of CFU when compared to conventional (Colgate, 0.06±0.13), which was more efficient (p=0.000). For C. albicans, C. glabrata and E. coli, all dentifrices were similar to water (p=0.186). It was concluded, that the experimental dentifrice was effective against S. aureus and had not efficacy against Candida spp.; S. mutans; E. coli, as occurred with the commercials dentifrices.


Odontology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 108 (3) ◽  
pp. 366-375 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yukiro Kitagawa ◽  
Kazuhiro Yoshida ◽  
Kazuma Takase ◽  
Alireza Valanezhad ◽  
Ikuya Watanabe ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 420-427 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernanda Valentini ◽  
Murilo Souza Luz ◽  
Noéli Boscato ◽  
Tatiana Pereira-Cenci

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document