scholarly journals A Case of Iatrogenic External Iliac Vein Injury During Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

EJVES Extra ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 65-66
Author(s):  
A.A Shetty ◽  
A.J Tindall ◽  
R.W Hoile ◽  
J.P Beavis
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Iliac Vein ◽  
Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
External Iliac Vein ◽  
Vein Injury

scholarly journals External iliac vein injury during total hip arthroplasty: a case report

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-30
Author(s):  
Ji Hyo Kim ◽  
Ji Hyun Kim ◽  
Hyeon Jun Lee ◽  
Yehun Jin ◽  
Seong Wook Hong
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Iliac Vein ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
External Iliac Vein ◽  
Vein Injury

scholarly journals External iliac vein compression secondary to osteolysis-induced hematoma in total hip arthroplasty

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 279-283
Author(s):  
Alvin K. Shieh ◽  
Zachary C. Lum ◽  
Avreeta K. Singh ◽  
Gavin C. Pereira
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Iliac Vein ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
External Iliac Vein ◽  
Iliac Vein Compression

Clinical, functional and radiographic outcomes after revision total hip arthroplasty with tapered fluted modular or non-modular stems: a systematic review

2021 ◽  
pp. 112070002110043
Author(s):  
Antonios A Koutalos ◽  
Sokratis Varitimidis ◽  
Konstantinos N Malizos ◽  
Theofilos Karachalios
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Revision Rate ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Fracture Rate ◽  
Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Radiographic Outcomes

Purpose: The aim of the study was to systematically evaluate clinical outcomes of tapered fluted stems, either monoblock or modular, in revision total hip arthroplasty. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science and Cochrane databases were systematically searched by 2 researchers. Clinical studies reporting primarily on survival and re-revision rates, and secondarily on subsidence, dislocation, intraoperative fractures, periprosthetic fractures and infection were included. 2 investigators assessed the quality of the studies. Results: 46 studies were included in this review, reporting on 4601 stem revisions. The pooled re-revision rate was 5.1% and long-term survival ranged from 75% to 98.5%. No differences were observed between monoblock and modular stems regarding re-revision rate, dislocation rate, periprosthetic fracture rate or infection rates. Monoblock stems exhibited more subsidence and modular stems displayed more intraoperative fractures. Conclusions: Satisfactory results can be obtained with the use of tapered fluted end-bearing stems. Monoblock stems offer the same clinical results as modular stems.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document