The reliability of the Wolf Motor Function Test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke

2001 ◽  
Vol 82 (6) ◽  
pp. 750-755 ◽  
Author(s):  
David M. Morris ◽  
Gitendra Uswatte ◽  
Jean E. Crago ◽  
Edwin W. Cook ◽  
Edward Taub
Keyword(s):  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Motor Function ◽  
Extremity Function ◽  
Function Test ◽  
Wolf Motor Function Test ◽  
Upper Extremity Function

scholarly journals The effect of the Bobath therapy programme on upper limb and hand function in chronic stroke individuals with moderate to severe deficits

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (10) ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Thanchanok Pumprasart ◽  
Noppol Pramodhyakul ◽  
Pagamas Piriyaprasarth
Keyword(s):  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Motor Function ◽  
Upper Limb ◽  
Muscle Tone ◽  
Chronic Stroke ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Limb Function ◽  
Function Test ◽  
Wolf Motor Function Test ◽  
Therapy Programme

Background/Aims The Bobath concept has long been used to improve postural control and limb function post-stroke, yet its effect in patients with deficits have not been clearly demonstrated. This study aimed to investigate the effect of the latest Bobath therapy programme on upper limb functions, muscle tone and sensation in chronic stroke individuals with moderate to severe deficits. Methods A pre–post test design was implemented. The participants were chronic stroke individuals (n=26). Home-based intervention based on the Bobath concept was administered 3 days per week for 6 weeks (20 repetitions × 3 sets per task each session). Outcome measures consisted of the Wolf Motor Function Test, Fugl-Meyer Assessment for the upper extremity, Modified Ashworth Scale, and the Revised Nottingham Sensory Assessment. Data were analysed using the Wilcoxon Signed rank test. Results Almost all items of the Wolf Motor Function Test and the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for the upper extremity demonstrated statistically significant differences post-intervention. Finger flexor muscle tone and stereognosis were also significantly improved. Conclusions The 6-week Bobath therapy programme could improve upper limb function and impairments in chronic stroke individuals with moderate to severe deficits. Its effects were also demonstrated in improving muscle tone and cortical sensation.

scholarly journals Effect of the complex physical therapy on the upper extremity function, functional independence and cognition in post-stroke patients

2021 ◽  
pp. 61-68
Author(s):  
Iriah Uwa-Agbonikhena ◽  
Viktoriia Gryb ◽  
Viktoriia Gerasymchuk ◽  
Marta Kupnovytska-Sabadosh ◽  
Liubov Maksymchuk
Keyword(s):  
Physical Therapy ◽  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Motor Function ◽  
Hand Function ◽  
Functional Independence ◽  
Motor Dysfunction ◽  
Extremity Function ◽  
Upper Extremity Function ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Motor dysfunction and cognitive impairment (CI) are the most prevalent and disabling among the stroke consequences. CI decreases the effectivity of motor rehabilitation, but motor dysfunction itself may also influence the manifestations and progression of CI. So development and study of novel physical therapy tactics, which are aiming to target both of these syndromes, becomes a subject of great interest nowadays. The aim of study was to evaluate the impact of different physical therapy approaches on the upper extremity function, cognition and functional independence in patients in 1 year after ischemic stroke. Materials and methods. Totally there were 72 patients examined in the 1-year period after first-ever anterior circulation ischemic stroke. Neurological status, upper extremity function and functional independence were assessed with the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA), modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and the Functional Independence Measurement (FIM). Cognitive function was assessed with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB), Trail-making Test A and B tests (TMT). Patients in Group 1 received secondary stroke prevention therapy and performed the exercises complex for general muscle function improvement for 2 months; patients in Group 2 also performed the exercise complex for paretic hand function improvement for 2 months. Results. After 2 months of physical therapy a significant increase of the FIM “Self-care”, “Transfer” and therefore subtotal motor and total scores was observed in patients in Group 2; in Group 1 significant improvement was observed only in “Transfer” and subtotal motor scores. Adding of the hand exercise to the physical therapy complex (Group 2) appeared to be more beneficial for the upper extremity motor function. Patients in Group 2 after 2 months showed increase of the FMA “Wrist” score by 40 % (p<0.05), “Hand” score by 42.8 % (p<0.01) and “Total motor function” by 30.1 % (p<0.05), and the “Total motor function” score in Group 2 was 10.9 % higher in comparison with the Group 1 (p<0.05). In cognitive status significant differences compared to baseline level were observed only in Group 2; MoCA score increased by 14.3 % (p<0.05) and TMT-B performance time decreased by 14.8 % (p<0.05). Baseline MoCA score correlated with FMA “Wrist” (r=0.32; p=0.028), “Hand” (r=0.49; p=0.001) and “Total motor function” (r=0.46; p=0.004) scores. TMT-B score showed significant correlation with the FMA “Wrist” (r=-0.032; p=0.025), “Hand” (-0.45; p=0.009), “Speed/coordination” (r=-0.023; p=0.036) and “Total motor function” (r=-0.42; p=0.023). Conclusion. Adding of exercise for hand function improvement into the physical therapy complex for post-stroke patients contributes to better upper extremity motor performance and therefore is more favourable for patients’ functional independence. Upper extremity motor impairment, especially hand and wrist dysfunction, are associated with worse cognitive performance. Hand function and fine motor skills improvement could be beneficial for the patients’ cognition. Further research is needed in regard to the prognostic significance of these findings and their impact on the treatment and rehabilitation strategies.

scholarly journals Can the Wolf Motor Function Test be Streamlined?

2009 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 422-428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberly Bogard ◽  
Steven Wolf ◽  
Qin Zhang ◽  
Paul Thompson ◽  
David Morris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Motor Function ◽  
Movement Therapy ◽  
Change Score ◽  
Functional Level ◽  
Regression Methods ◽  
Constraint Induced Movement Therapy ◽  
Gender Concordance ◽  
Function Test ◽  
Wolf Motor Function Test

Background. To assess upper extremity (UE) capabilities following stroke, the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) measures time to complete 15 UE tasks and 2 strength tasks, but takes 30 to 45 minutes for the clinician to complete. Objective. In an effort to streamline the WMFT, this study evaluated the association between the magnitude of improvement on any timed task of the WMFT and the change score on all other tasks among participants in the Extremity Constraint Induced Therapy Evaluation (EXCITE) trial. Methods. This association was evaluated using regression methods according to chronicity and controlling for key covariates (functional level, gender, concordance) for log mean WMFT scores. Results. After controlling for covariates, 6 tasks (hand to table [front], hand to box [front], reach and retrieve, lift can, lift pencil, and fold towel) influenced the overall WMFT score for survivors meeting EXCITE criteria and treated within 3 to 9 months poststroke. Six different tasks (extend elbow weight, hand to box [front], lift can, lift pencil, turn key in lock, and fold towel) influenced the overall WMFT score for those receiving constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) 1 year later. The importance of certain tasks relative to others may best represent overall UE function, but this streamlining enables the clinician to prioritize these tasks in the evaluation. Conclusions. The delineation of those tasks depends on the time poststroke from enrollment to CIMT. This study demonstrates that the WMFT can be streamlined from 17 to 6 tasks.

scholarly journals Efficacy of functional magnetic stimulation in improving upper extremity function after stroke: a randomized, single-blind, controlled study

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (6) ◽  
pp. 030006052092788
Author(s):  
Xiaowei Chen ◽  
Xuncan Liu ◽  
Yinxing Cui ◽  
Guoxing Xu ◽  
Lu Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Motor Function ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Extremity Function ◽  
Upper Extremity Function

Objective To clarify the efficacy of functional magnetic stimulation (FMS) in improving hemiplegic upper extremity function in patients with sub-acute stroke. Methods In this randomized controlled trial, 40 sub-acute stroke patients with hemiplegia were recruited from inpatient wards in the Department of Rehabilitation and randomly assigned to two groups. In the FMS group, magnetic stimulation was applied to extensor muscle groups of the affected upper extremity. In the low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (LF-rTMS) group, stimulation was applied to the contralesional primary motor cortex. All patients received occupational therapy. Hand and upper extremity motor function was evaluated using the Fugl–Meyer Assessment for upper extremity (FMA-UE), and the Barthel Index (BI) evaluated daily living abilities. Results The FMA-UE and BI scores were significantly increased in both groups following stimulation. Furthermore, a significant between-group difference was observed in both FMA-UE and BI scores after 2 weeks of therapy. In the FMS group, 6 of 19 patients regained wrist and finger extension abilities, but only 2 patients regained equivalent motor skills in the LF-rTMS group Conclusions FMS improves paretic upper extremity function and leads to better recovery of motor activity than LF-rTMS. FMS may be a novel modality to improve motor function.

scholarly journals Effect of Standing on a Standardized Measure of Upper Extremity Function

2020 ◽  
pp. 153944922093705
Author(s):  
Jill Campbell Stewart ◽  
Ashley Saba ◽  
Jessica F. Baird ◽  
Melissa B. Kolar ◽  
Michael O’Donnell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Completion Time ◽  
Hand Function ◽  
Daily Activities ◽  
Extremity Function ◽  
Function Test ◽  
Upper Extremity Function ◽  
Standardized Measure ◽  
The Right ◽  
Insight Into

Although many daily activities that require the upper extremity are performed in standing, arm motor function is generally measured in sitting. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of standing on a measure of upper extremity function, the Jebsen Hand Function Test (JHFT). Twelve nondisabled adults (26.3 ± 3.1 years) completed the JHFT with the right and left arms under two conditions: sitting and standing. Total time to complete the JHFT increased when performed in standing compared with sitting in both arms ( p = .005); mean increase was 4.4% and 5.6% for the right and left arms, respectively. Checker stacking was the only subtest that showed a significant increase in completion time in standing for both arms ( p = .001); card turning showed an increase for the left arm only ( p = .002). Measurement of upper extremity function in standing may provide insight into arm motor capacity within the context of standing postural control demands.

scholarly journals ASSOCIATIONS BETWEEN THE UPPER EXTREMITY FUNCTION AND COGNITION IN POST-STROKE PATIENTS

2021 ◽  
Vol 74 (8) ◽  
pp. 1917-1920
Author(s):  
Iriah F. Uwa-Agbonikhena ◽  
Viktoriia A. Gryb ◽  
Viktoriia R. Gerasymchuk
Keyword(s):  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Motor Function ◽  
Motor Impairment ◽  
Motor Dysfunction ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Clock Drawing Test ◽  
Post Stroke ◽  
Extremity Function ◽  
Upper Extremity Function

The aim: Was to determine the relations between the the upper extremity function and cognition in post-stroke patients. Materials and methods: Totally there were 86 patients examined in the 1-year period after first-ever anterior circulation ischemic stroke. Examination of the upper extremity function was performed with the Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA). Cognitive function was assessed with the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB), Trail-making Test A and B (TMT) and the Clock Drawing Test (CDT). Results: Motor dysfunction mostly manifested in low “Wrist” and “Hand” subtests scores (5 and 7 , respectively) and therefore resulted in decreased “Total motor function” score of 40 . The most significant relations were found out between the FMA “Hand”, “Total motor function” subtests and CI indices. MoCA score correlated with FMA “Wrist” (r=0.34; p=0.021), “Hand” (r=0.52; p=0.001) and “Total motor function” (r=0.48; p=0.003) scores. “Hand” score also correlated with the FAB (r=0.43; p=0.012), CDT (r=0.22; p=0.016), TMT-A (r=-0.31; p=0.023) and TMT-B (-0.48; p=0.009) scores. There was no significant correlation between the sensory FMA subtests. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that upper extremity motor impairment, especially hand and wrist dysfunction, are associated with cognitive impairment and executive functions disorder in particular.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document