A Hybrid ARIMA-ANN approach for optimum estimation and forecasting of gasoline consumption

2017 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 719-728 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reza Babazadeh
Energy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 222 ◽  
pp. 119869
Author(s):  
Lean Yu ◽  
Yueming Ma ◽  
Mengyao Ma

2021 ◽  
pp. 105305
Author(s):  
Mohamad Afkham ◽  
Hamed Ghoddusi ◽  
Nima Rafizadeh

1988 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 276-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walter Wasserfallen ◽  
Heinz Güntensperger

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 709-722 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas M. Fullerton Jr ◽  
Jorge Ibarra Salazar ◽  
Mario Elizalde
Keyword(s):  

2005 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 355-368
Author(s):  
Mariko WADA ◽  
Yoshitaka AOYAMA ◽  
Dai NAKAGAWA ◽  
Yuka KARATANI

2021 ◽  
pp. 1532673X2110434
Author(s):  
Sung Eun Kim ◽  
Joonseok Yang

Gasoline prices are often a heated topic during presidential election campaigns in the United States. Yet, presidents have limited control over gasoline prices. Do voters reward or punish the president for changes in gasoline prices? Why might voters blame the president for an outcome beyond direct presidential control? This study addresses these questions by testing the effects of gasoline prices on pocketbook retrospection by voters. To capture the personal economic burden of gasoline prices, we rely on average driving times to work, given the inelastic nature of gasoline consumption for commuting. The results provide evidence for pocketbook voting: constituencies with longer average driving times to work are more likely to hold the president accountable for gasoline price increases. These findings have broader implications regarding electoral accountability and rationality in voting.


2013 ◽  
Vol 51 (5) ◽  
pp. 3063-3076 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Kalogiros ◽  
Marios N. Anagnostou ◽  
Emmanouil N. Anagnostou ◽  
Mario Montopoli ◽  
Errico Picciotti ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document