scholarly journals Forming limit diagram prediction of 6061 aluminum by GTN damage model

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rasoul Safdarian
Keyword(s):  
Damage Model ◽  
Forming Limit Diagram ◽  
Numerical Results ◽  
Experimental Results ◽  
Correct Selection ◽  
Forming Limit ◽  
Uniaxial Tensile ◽  
Uniaxial Tensile Test ◽  
Gtn Model ◽  
Gtn Damage Model

Forming limit diagram (FLD) is one of the formability criteria which is a plot of major strain versus minor strain. In the present study, Gurson-Tvergaard-Needleman (GTN) model is used for FLD prediction of aluminum alloy 6061. Whereas correct selection of GTN parameters’ is effective in the accuracy of this model, anti-inference method and numerical simulation of the uniaxial tensile test is used for identification of GTN parameters. Proper parameters of GTN model is imported to the finite element analysis of Nakazima test for FLD prediction. Whereas FLD is dependent on forming history and strain path, forming limit stress diagram (FLSD) based on the GTN damage model is also used for forming limit prediction in the numerical method. Numerical results for FLD, FLSD and punch’s load-displacement are compared with experimental results. Results show that there is a good agreement between the numerical and experimental results. The main drawback of numerical results for prediction of the right-hand side of FLD which was concluded in other researchers’ studies was solved in the present study by using GTN damage model.

Forming Limit Diagram of the AMS 5599 Sheet Metal

2013 ◽  
Vol 58 (4) ◽  
pp. 1213-1217
Author(s):  
W. Fracz ◽  
F. Stachowicz ◽  
T. Trzepieciński ◽  
T. Pieją
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Properties ◽  
Sheet Metal ◽  
Plastic Anisotropy ◽  
Experimental Studies ◽  
Forming Limit Diagram ◽  
Forming Limit ◽  
Uniaxial Tensile ◽  
Strain Hardening Exponent ◽  
Uniaxial Tensile Test ◽  
Anisotropy Ratio

Abstract Formability of sheet metal is dependent on the mechanical properties. Some materials form better than others - moreover, a material that has the best formability for one stamping may behave very poorly in a stamping of another configuration. For these reasons, extensive test programs are often carried out in an attempt to correlate material formability with value of some mechanical properties. The formability of sheet metal has frequently been expressed by the value of strain hardening exponent and plastic anisotropy ratio. The stress-strain and hardening behaviour of a material is very important in determining its resistance to plastic instability. However experimental studies of formability of various materials have revealed basic differences in behaviour, such as the ”brass-type” and the ”steel-type”, exhibiting respectively, zero and positive dependence of forming limit on the strain ratio. In this study mechanical properties and the Forming Limit Diagram of the AMS 5599 sheet metal were determined using uniaxial tensile test and Marciniak’s flat bottomed punch test respectively. Different methods were used for the FLD calculation - results of these calculations were compared with experimental results

Forming Limit Diagram Determination of Al 3105 Sheets and Al 3105/Polypropylene/Al 3105 Sandwich Sheets Using Numerical Calculations and Experimental Investigations

2013 ◽  
Vol 135 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. H. Parsa ◽  
M. Ettehad ◽  
P. H. Matin
Keyword(s):  
Damage Model ◽  
Sheet Thickness ◽  
Forming Limit Diagram ◽  
Forming Limit ◽  
Experimental Investigations ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Gtn Damage Model ◽  
Core Thickness ◽  
Sandwich Sheets

Sandwich sheet structures are gaining a wide array of applications in the aeronautical, marine, automotive, and civil engineering fields. Since such sheets can be subjected to forming/stamping processes, it is crucial to characterize their limiting amount of deformation before trying out any forming/stamping process. To achieve this goal, sandwich sheets of Al 3105/polymer/Al 3105 were prepared using thin film hot melt adheres. Through an experimental effort, forming limit diagrams (FLDs) of the prepared sandwich sheets were evaluated. In addition, simulation efforts were conducted to predict the FLDs of the sandwich sheets using finite element analysis (FEA) by considering the Gurson–Tvergaard–Needleman (GTN) damage model. The agreement among the experimental results and simulated predictions was promising. The effects of different parameters such as polymer core thickness, aluminum face sheet thickness, and shape constraints were investigated on the FLDs.

Fundamental Investigation for Tensile Test Using Conical Cupping Die

2014 ◽  
Vol 622-623 ◽  
pp. 292-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomoyuki Ota ◽  
Takashi Iizuka
Keyword(s):  
Tensile Test ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Forming Limit Diagram ◽  
Forming Limit ◽  
Uniaxial Tensile ◽  
Bulge Test ◽  
Uniaxial Tensile Test ◽  
Biaxial Tensile ◽  
Specimen Shape ◽  
Specimen Edge

A number of researches have conducted in order to evaluate the ductile fracture occurrence by using forming limit diagram. However, specimen shape and testing machine for obtaining forming limit diagram of sheet metal have some problems. The problem about specimen shape is occurring at the specimen edge. In uniaxial tensile test, the specimen edge may cause a defused neck in width direction and may have influence on fracture occurrence. In biaxial tensile test by using a cruciform specimen, a uniform biaxial deformation is not obtained because uniaxial tensile stress occurs at the specimen edge. Tensile test by using a specimen which does not have such edges should carry out, for example, in bulge test and multi-axial tube expansion test, specimens without edge are used. However, these methods need special machines. Therefore, new biaxial tensile testing method is required. By this method, materials deform depending on biaxial strain state by using popular pressing machines.

An innovation in finite element simulation via crystal plasticity assessment of grain morphology effect on sheet metal formability

2021 ◽  
pp. 146442072110246
Author(s):  
Mostafa Habibi ◽  
Roya Darabi ◽  
Jose C de Sa ◽  
Ana Reis
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element ◽  
Tensile Test ◽  
Crystal Plasticity ◽  
Forming Limit Diagram ◽  
Material Behavior ◽  
Forming Limit ◽  
Uniaxial Tensile ◽  
Uniaxial Tensile Test ◽  
Polycrystal Plasticity ◽  
Grain Distribution

Experimental and numerical study regarding the uniaxial tensile test and the forming limit diagram are addressed in this paper for AL2024 with the face-centered cube structure. First, representation of a grain structure can be obtained directly by mapping metallographic observations via scanning electron microscopy approach. Artificial grain microstructures produced by Voronoi Tessellation method are employed in the model using VGRAIN software. By resorting to the finite element software (ABAQUS) capabilities, the constitutive equations of the crystal plasticity were utilized and implemented as a user subroutine material UMAT code. The hardening parameters were calibrated by a trial and error approach in order to fit experimental tensile results with the simulation. Then the effect of the changing grain size, the heterogeneity factor, and the grain aspect ratio were studied for a uniaxial tensile test to emphasize the importance of the microstudy behavior of grains in material behavior. Furthermore, the polycrystal plasticity grain distribution was employed in the Nakazima test in order to obtain the forming limit diagram. The crystal plasticity-driven forming limit diagram reveals more accurate strains, taking into account the involving the micromechanical features of the grains. An innovative approach is pursued in this study to discover the necking angle, both in tensile test or Nakazima samples, showing a good agreement with the experiment results.

Developing Uniaxial Tensile Test as an Alternate Method for Thermo Mechanical Process Evaluation

2011 ◽  
Vol 383-390 ◽  
pp. 5404-5408
Author(s):  
Dedi Priadi ◽  
Richard A. M. Napitupulu ◽  
Eddy S. Siradj
Keyword(s):  
Tensile Test ◽  
Plane Strain ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Forming Limit Diagram ◽  
Grain Structure ◽  
Forming Limit ◽  
Uniaxial Tensile ◽  
Uniaxial Tensile Test ◽  
Mechanical Process ◽  
Uniaxial Test

The alternate method for evaluating the thermo mechanical process has been developed. Small attention has been paid to the mechanism of plastic deformation especially plane strain analysis. Modified the specimen geometry and using uniaxial tensile test was done to view the process. Experimental results show that the forming limit diagram as one of the formability characteristic can be view the plane strain condition that present on the thermo mechanical process. The microstructure result shows that there is a similar grain structure between hot tensile test and hot rolling results as one of thermo mechanical process method. It was concluded that the uniaxial test using universal testing machine could be done to evaluate the thermo mechanical process.

Determination of Flow Curve Using Bulge Test and Calibration of Damage for Ito-Goya Models

2013 ◽  
Vol 554-557 ◽  
pp. 182-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno Martins ◽  
Abel D. Santos ◽  
Pedro Teixeira ◽  
K. Ito ◽  
N. Mori
Keyword(s):  
Tensile Test ◽  
Damage Model ◽  
Strain Curve ◽  
Uniaxial Tensile ◽  
Bulge Test ◽  
Uniaxial Tensile Test ◽  
Damage Prediction ◽  
Damage Models ◽  
Material Information

The standard uniaxial tensile test is the widely accepted method to obtain relevant properties of mechanical characterization of sheet metal materials. However the range of strain obtained from tensile test is limited. The bulge test is an alternative to obtain ranges of deformation, higher than tensile test, thus permitting a better characterization for material behaviour. This paper presents a sensitivity analysis for some influencing variables used in bulge measurements, thus giving some guidelines for the evaluation of the stress-strain curve from experimental results using a developed experimental mechanical system. Additionally, using bulge test up to fracture shall give material information regarding damage, which in turn may be used to evaluate and calibrate damage models. A methodology is presented to be used for evaluation and calibration of Ito-Goya damage model of damage prediction.

European Project ATLAS+: Evaluation of a Shear Modified Gurson Model by Comparison to Experimental Fracture Tests on SENT Fracture Specimens

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tobias Bolinder ◽  
Dominique Moinereau ◽  
Patrick Le Delliou ◽  
Anna Dahl ◽  
Jacques Besson
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Stress Triaxiality ◽  
Experimental Results ◽  
Uniaxial Tensile ◽  
Uniaxial Tensile Test ◽  
Model Parameters ◽  
Coupled Models ◽  
Gurson Model ◽  
Ductile Tearing ◽  
Fracture Tests

Abstract This paper will assess the capability of the shear modified Gurson model developed by Nahshon and Hutchinson which is used by Kiwa Inspecta within the ATLAS+ project. This is done by comparison to experimental results from SENT fracture tests performed by EDF and ARMINES. The procedure for parameter identification for the standard and shear modified Gurson model is also summarized. The work presented in this paper is part of Work Package 3 within the ATLAS+ project. WP3 focus mainly on ductile tearing predictions for large defects in components. Models exists to accurately predict ductile tearing and to consider phenomena such as stress triaxiality effects. These advanced models include local approach coupled models or advanced energetic approaches. However, there is a need to validate these models for use in industrial applications. This will be done within the ATLAS+ project by predicting the results of the large scale component tests where input to the models are given from small size laboratory specimens. Within the paper a description of the shear modified Gurson model is given, as developed by Nashson and Hutchinson [1]. Furthermore, the procedure in determining the material model parameters is discussed. To determine the material parameters for the shear modified Gurson model a uniaxial tensile test, a fracture test and shear tests are used. The material that is used is the ferritic steel WB 36 (15 NiCuMoNb 5) which will be used for the large scale component tests within the ATLAS+ project. The procedure is also evaluated by comparing predictions done with the shear modified Gurson model to experimental results from SENT specimens performed by EDF and ARMINES. A comparison of the capability in predicting the ductile tearing in the SENT experiments between the standard Gurson model and the shear modified Gurson model is also presented within the paper.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document