scholarly journals Gabapentinoid prescription in oral medicine and oral surgery practice. Part I − Experience from a French Orofacial pain clinic

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arek Sulukdjian ◽  
Richard L'homme ◽  
Audrey Chanlon ◽  
Nathan Moreau

Gabapentinoids, pregabalin and gabapentin, are neuronal voltage-gated calcium channel inhibitors mainly prescribed for the treatment of partial epilepsy and neuropathic pain. Although their efficacy as first-line treatments for painful neuropathic conditions (and several non-neuropathic painful conditions) has been well established in general medical practice, their efficacy and prescription in Oral Medicine and Oral Surgery practice has received little attention so far. This didactic article, the first of a two-part series, aims to present the experience of a French tertiary orofacial pain clinic regarding the prescription of gabapentinoids in Orofacial pain conditions that fall within the scope of the oral surgeon's practice.

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 37
Author(s):  
Arek Sulukdjian ◽  
Richard L'Homme ◽  
Audrey Chanlon ◽  
Nathan Moreau

Introduction: Gabapentinoids, pregabalin and gabapentin, neuronal voltage-gated calcium channel inhibitors are first-line treatments for painful neuropathic conditions (and several non-neuropathic painful conditions). Nevertheless, their efficacy and prescription in Oral Medicine and Oral Surgery practice has received little attention so far. A previous article, the first of a two-part series, presented the experience of a French tertiary orofacial pain clinic regarding the prescription of gabapentinoids in orofacial conditions. This second article aimed to explore the scientific literature on the subject. Material and methods: A systematic scoping review was conducted on multiple relevant databases (MEDLINE®, Cochrane®, Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament et des produits de santé, Haute Autorité de Santé) and journal archives (JOMOS, JSOMFS) to assess the indications, non-indications and contraindications of gabapentinoids in an Oral Medicine/Oral Surgery context. Results: Out of 131 records selected during the initial screening, 34 matched the inclusion criteria and were used for subsequent analyses. Gabapentinoids were prescribed in three clinical contexts: orofacial pain management (32 studies), anxiolysis (1 study) and prevention of postoperative nausea/vomiting (1 study), with variable quality of evidence: high (6 studies), moderate (3 studies), low (5 studies) and very low (20 studies) quality studies (GRADE scale). Untoward effects of gabapentinoids were reported in 16 studies, mainly neurological (vertigo, drowsiness, sedation) and gastro-intestinal (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, constipation). Gabapentinoids were ineffective in preemptive and postoperative analgesia and for the management of mucositis-related pain. Discussion: There is some evidence supporting the use of gabapentinoids in Oral Medicine/Oral Surgery in adherence with current practices observed in France and other countries (practices often extrapolated from their use in other non-orofacial painful conditions). The methodological quality of the studies included in this scoping review is often poor and publication bias is most probable in this field. Therefore, any conclusion drawn from such studies must be subject to circumspection. Conclusion: Data obtained from the present scoping review suggests the potential use of gabapentinoids as second-line treatments for anxiolysis, prevention of postoperative nausea/vomiting and the management of trigeminal neuralgia and masticatory myalgia. Other potential indications of gabapentinoids in Oral Medicine/Oral Surgery practice include cranial neuralgias, post-traumatic trigeminal neuropathies, first bite syndrome, burning mouth syndrome and migraine prophylaxis, when other treatment options are inefficient or unavailable.


Dental Update ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 493-501 ◽  
Author(s):  
David H Felix ◽  
Jane Luker ◽  
Crispian Scully
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 1124-1136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Li ◽  
Robert Y. North ◽  
Laurence D. Rhines ◽  
Claudio Esteves Tatsui ◽  
Ganesh Rao ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 74-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Dubey ◽  
S Mujoo ◽  
SB Sakarde ◽  
AK Dubey

Paroxysmal neuralgia is relatively uncommon in children. Neuropathic orofacial pain is a challenge for the clinician, as no obvious dental pathology exists either clinically or radiographically. Dentist and physician should be able to recognize the characteristics of neuropathic pain so as to correctly diagnose these conditions hence avoid unnecessary dental intervention. This article reviews the conditions with paroxysmal neuralgia in children and available treatment strategies. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/kumj.v10i4.11000 Kathmandu Univ Med J 2012;10(4):74-77


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppina Campisi ◽  
Giacomo Oteri ◽  
SIPMO Study Group ◽  
SIdCO Study Group

Author(s):  
Saurabh Kohli ◽  
Taruna Sharma ◽  
Juhi Kalra ◽  
Dilip C. Dhasmana

Background: Neuropathic pain is associated with prolonged disability and is usually not responsive to conventional analgesics like NSAIDs and opioids. Even the recommended first-line drugs are effective in less than 50% patients. Thus, drugs with different mechanisms of action are needed. Baclofen, a GABA-B agonist has shown benefit in different types of neuropathic pains and is compared against pregabalin.Methods: The sciatic nerve was ligated in 2 groups of 6 rats each as per the chronic constriction injury model of neuropathic pain on day 0. After 14 days the effect of single doses of pregabalin (30mg/kg) and baclofen (5mg/kg) intraperitoneally were assessed over a 2 hours period. Thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia were assessed as measures of neuropathic pain by the hotplate and pin-prick method respectively.Results: Significant thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia was produced 14 days after sciatic nerve ligation in both the groups (p <0.05). Both pregabalin (p <0.001) and baclofen (p <0.01) were effective in decreasing thermal hyperalgesia throughout the two hours study period, but pregabalin was more effective as compared to baclofen (p <0.05) at 30, 60 and 120minutes. Both the drugs produced a significant decrease in mechanical hyperalgesia (p <0.01) throughout the study period. Again, pregabalin was the more effective drug (p <0.05) at all time points.Conclusions: Significant thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia was seen 14 days after sciatic nerve ligation. Both pregabalin and baclofen were effective in reversing the hyperalgesia, but pregabalin was the more effective of the two drugs at all time points.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document