Assessing transport measures using cost-benefit and multi-criteria analysis

2016 ◽  
pp. 161-188
Author(s):  
Taale ◽  
Muizer ◽  
Kiel
Keyword(s):  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Multi Criteria Analysis

How can multi-criteria analysis support deliberative spatial planning? A critical review of methods and participatory frameworks

Evaluation ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 135638902110203
Author(s):  
Geert te Boveldt ◽  
Imre Keseru ◽  
Cathy Macharis
Keyword(s):  
Critical Review ◽  
Spatial Planning ◽  
Evaluation Method ◽  
Planning Process ◽  
Cost Benefit Analysis ◽  
Stakeholder Participation ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Learning Tools ◽  
Analysis Methods ◽  
Multi Criteria Analysis

In spatial planning, the paradigm has shifted from positivist to deliberative approaches. Still, cost–benefit analysis remains the dominant evaluation method. Multi-criteria analysis is arguably more appropriate, as it allows for stakeholder participation. While there are dozens of ever more sophisticated multi-criteria analysis methods, their practicality as real-world learning tools has received little attention. The goal of this article is to assess the suitability of different multi-criteria analysis methods for deliberative planning. It presents a critical review of the logical-mathematical cores of the principal methods but also of the different participatory frameworks within which they can be applied. While mathematically sophisticated methods are valuable in well-defined problems with precise data available, we conclude that in the participatory and politically sensitive stages of the planning process, user-friendly and transparent methods are more appropriate and recommend the development of a method that supports the incremental improvement of design options rather than ranking alternatives.

scholarly journals Cost-Benefit and Multi-Criteria Analysis of Wind Energy Parks Development Potential in Latvia

2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 1229-1240
Author(s):  
Liga Rozentale ◽  
Dagnija Blumberga
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
State Aid ◽  
Offshore Wind ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Good Potential ◽  
Multi Criteria Analysis ◽  
Renewable Electricity Generation ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Offshore Wind Parks

Abstract In the last decade the European Union (EU) has been steadily increasing its’ ambition regarding the climate policy. Considering the linkage between the climate targets and energy sector’s greenhouse gas emissions, the EU’s member states are respectively adjusting their energy policies. One of the current trends in the EU is to increase the renewable electricity generation by roll-out of onshore and offshore wind parks. This research aims at evaluating the potential of large-scale wind parks in Latvia by using the cost-benefit and multi-criteria analysis from financial, technical, climate and administrative perspectives as well as considering the impact on security of energy supply. The results of the research show a good potential for onshore wind park development in Latvia without any state aid, while offshore wind parks are in a much worse position and would not be beneficial for the project promoters without any kind of EU or state aid.

scholarly journals A conceptual approach to the use of Cost Benefit and Multi Criteria Analysis in natural hazard management

2006 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 293-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. D. Gamper ◽  
M. Thöni ◽  
H. Weck-Hannemann
Keyword(s):  
Natural Hazard ◽  
Cost Benefit Analysis ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Decision Support Techniques ◽  
Final Decision ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Protection Measures ◽  
Hazard Management ◽  
The Public ◽  
Multi Criteria Analysis

Abstract. Decision-making for protection measures against natural hazards entails major complexities for final decision makers. The issue in question does not only implicate a variety of criteria that need to be considered but also scarce financial resources make the allocation decision a difficult task. Furthermore, these decisions appear to be multidisciplinary in nature. Stakeholders from experts over politicians and the public are among the affected parties in making and dealing with the consequences of such decisions. In order to capture the complexity that arises when incorporating the varieties of interests as well as impacts protection measures have on the environment, the economy and society, transparent and multidisciplinary decision support techniques are needed. This paper looks at how Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA), a tool already applied to decisions concerning protective measures, and Multi Criteria Analysis (MCA), even though new to the field as such but already successfully practiced in other environmental areas, perform according to the abovementioned criteria. A conceptual overview of the methodologies will be given along with a discussion of the respective strengths and weaknesses. Looking at past applications, this overview gives an analysis about the potential of socio economics in its contribution to natural hazard research.

Comparing the output of cost benefit and multi-criteria analysis

2006 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 414-423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alejandro Tudela ◽  
Natalia Akiki ◽  
Rene Cisternas
Keyword(s):  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Multi Criteria Analysis

scholarly journals Strategic evaluation of the railway traction energy supply development on the Hungarian railway network

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tibor Princz-Jakovics ◽  
Dóra Bachmann
Keyword(s):  
Energy Supply ◽  
Planning Process ◽  
Cost Benefit Analysis ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Economic Benefits ◽  
Railway Network ◽  
Energy Supply System ◽  
Age Related ◽  
Multi Criteria Analysis ◽  
Set Up

Transformer substations are hidden elements of the railway infrastructure, they have a long service life and reliable operation. On this reason reconstruction of substations are often left out of railway development projects. The board responsible for railway development in the Ministry of Innovation and Technology has decided to set up a project dedicated to substation development. The purpose of our work was to assess, examine and supervise the current technical status, network role and future sustainability of railway substations in order to choose a set of substations to be reconstructed in the given cost framework. We completed traction energy simulations to explore the weak points of the traction energy supply system and to provide basic data for the planning process. In our feasibility study we chose 20 of 38 substations to be reconstructed in a multi-step decision process. On Level 1 we assessed professional and operational aspects with multi-criteria analysis (MCA) regarding capacity shortages, energy efficiency, existence of remote control, characteristics of environmental protection and climate resilience, age-related failures, unit performance and network assessment. Based on the multi-criteria analysis we formed feasible technological options. To quantify and compare their long-term financial effects, on Level 2 we have chosen cost-effectiveness analysis methodology considering investment cost and the operational costs incurred during the estimated evaluation period. After option analysis we conducted cost-benefit analysis (CBA). Savings at social level are considered benefits in economic terms. As the type of the intervention did not fit the relevant CBA guide, we had to elaborate a special methodology for the assessment of economic benefits of the project. After all we have set up three project packages (6 or 9 or 20 substations) depending on available funding sources – and all three project packages can be regarded as economically viable and eligible for financing and implementation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document