Self-tuning control of an industrial pilot-scale reheating furnace: Design principles and application of a bilinear approach

1997 ◽  
Vol 144 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Dunoyer ◽  
K.J. Burnham ◽  
T.S. McAlpine
1984 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 1873-1878
Author(s):  
S. Kawata ◽  
H. Kanoh ◽  
M. Masubuchi

1992 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 227-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.G. Goodhart ◽  
K.J. Burnham ◽  
D.J.G. James

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 399-409
Author(s):  
Baizhen Gao ◽  
Rushant Sabnis ◽  
Tommaso Costantini ◽  
Robert Jinkerson ◽  
Qing Sun

Microbial communities drive diverse processes that impact nearly everything on this planet, from global biogeochemical cycles to human health. Harnessing the power of these microorganisms could provide solutions to many of the challenges that face society. However, naturally occurring microbial communities are not optimized for anthropogenic use. An emerging area of research is focusing on engineering synthetic microbial communities to carry out predefined functions. Microbial community engineers are applying design principles like top-down and bottom-up approaches to create synthetic microbial communities having a myriad of real-life applications in health care, disease prevention, and environmental remediation. Multiple genetic engineering tools and delivery approaches can be used to ‘knock-in' new gene functions into microbial communities. A systematic study of the microbial interactions, community assembling principles, and engineering tools are necessary for us to understand the microbial community and to better utilize them. Continued analysis and effort are required to further the current and potential applications of synthetic microbial communities.


1991 ◽  
Vol 138 (1) ◽  
pp. 50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leang S. Shieh ◽  
Xiao M. Zhao ◽  
John W. Sunkel
Keyword(s):  

1981 ◽  
Vol 128 (6) ◽  
pp. 283 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.Y. Allidina ◽  
F.M. Hughes ◽  
F.M. Tye
Keyword(s):  

TAPPI Journal ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
JANI LEHMONEN ◽  
TIMO RANTANEN ◽  
KARITA KINNUNEN-RAUDASKOSKI

The need for production cost savings and changes in the global paper and board industry during recent years have been constants. Changes in the global paper and board industry during past years have increased the need for more cost-efficient processes and production technologies. It is known that in paper and board production, foam typically leads to problems in the process rather than improvements in production efficiency. Foam forming technology, where foam is used as a carrier phase and a flowing medium, exploits the properties of dispersive foam. In this study, the possibility of applying foam forming technology to paper applications was investigated using a pilot scale paper forming environment modified for foam forming from conventional water forming. According to the results, the shape of jet-to-wire ratios was the same in both forming methods, but in the case of foam forming, the achieved scale of jet-to-wire ratio and MD/CD-ratio were wider and not behaving sensitively to shear changes in the forming section as a water forming process would. This kind of behavior would be beneficial when upscaling foam technology to the production scale. The dryness results after the forming section indicated the improvement in dewatering, especially when foam density was at the lowest level (i.e., air content was at the highest level). In addition, the dryness results after the pressing section indicated a faster increase in the dryness level as a function of foam density, with all density levels compared to the corresponding water formed sheets. According to the study, the bonding level of water- and foam-laid structures were at the same level when the highest wet pressing value was applied. The results of the study show that the strength loss often associated with foam forming can be compensated for successfully through wet pressing.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document