Compact battery-powered 0.5 MV Tesla-transformer based fast-pulse generator

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Sarkar
Keyword(s):  
Pulse Generator ◽  
Tesla Transformer ◽  
Fast Pulse

Tesla transformer for dual-output ultra-wide spectrum HPM pulse generator

2013 ◽  
Vol 25 (7) ◽  
pp. 1751-1754 ◽  
Author(s):  
石磊 Shi Lei ◽  
樊亚军 Fan Yajun ◽  
周金山 Zhou Jinshan ◽  
朱郁丰 Zhu Yufeng ◽  
朱四桃 Zhu Sitao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulse Generator ◽  
Wide Spectrum ◽  
Tesla Transformer

An 8-GW long-pulse generator based on Tesla transformer and pulse forming network

2014 ◽  
Vol 85 (6) ◽  
pp. 063303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiancang Su ◽  
Xibo Zhang ◽  
Rui Li ◽  
Liang Zhao ◽  
Xu Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulse Generator ◽  
Pulse Forming Network ◽  
Tesla Transformer ◽  
Long Pulse

Compact GW nanosecond pulse generator based on Tesla transformer

2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (12) ◽  
pp. 125001
Author(s):  
石磊 Shi Lei ◽  
朱郁丰 Zhu Yufeng ◽  
卢彦雷 Lu Yanlei ◽  
乔汉青 Qiao Hanqing ◽  
夏文锋 Xia Wenfeng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulse Generator ◽  
Nanosecond Pulse ◽  
Tesla Transformer

A Long-Pulse Generator Based on Tesla Transformer and Pulse-Forming Network

2009 ◽  
Vol 37 (10) ◽  
pp. 1954-1958 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiancang Su ◽  
Xibo Zhang ◽  
Guozhi Liu ◽  
Xiaoxin Song ◽  
Yafeng Pan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulse Generator ◽  
Pulse Forming Network ◽  
Tesla Transformer ◽  
Long Pulse

Spark counter as a fast pulse generator

1961 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 258-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.L. Gupta ◽  
N.K. Saha
Keyword(s):  
Pulse Generator ◽  
Spark Counter ◽  
Fast Pulse

Resonant Charging Performance of Spiral Tesla Transformer Applied in Compact High-Voltage Repetitive Nanosecond Pulse Generator

2013 ◽  
Vol 41 (12) ◽  
pp. 3651-3658 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yunlong Liu ◽  
Li Lee ◽  
Yu Bing ◽  
Yafeng Ge ◽  
Wen Hu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Voltage ◽  
Pulse Generator ◽  
Nanosecond Pulse ◽  
Tesla Transformer

scholarly journals Design of fast pulse generator for Kicker power supply in HIAF*

2020 ◽  
Vol 1401 ◽  
pp. 012018
Author(s):  
Y Liu ◽  
D Q Gao ◽  
J Zhao ◽  
J Gao ◽  
J B Shang-guan
Keyword(s):  
Power Supply ◽  
Pulse Generator ◽  
Fast Pulse

Repetitive nanosecond pulse generator based on Tesla transformer

2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 15001
Author(s):  
姜立秋 Jiang Liqiu ◽  
王之江 Wang Zhijiang ◽  
俞斌 Yu Bin ◽  
腾云 Teng Yun ◽  
曾臻 Zeng Zhen
Keyword(s):  
Pulse Generator ◽  
Nanosecond Pulse ◽  
Tesla Transformer

scholarly journals Free α-Subunit Is Superior to Luteinizing Hormone as a Marker of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Despite Desensitization at Fast Pulse Frequencies1

1999 ◽  
Vol 84 (3) ◽  
pp. 1028-1036
Author(s):  
Frances J. Hayes ◽  
Dennis J. McNicholl ◽  
David Schoenfeld ◽  
Erica E. Marsh ◽  
Janet E. Hall
Keyword(s):  
Luteinizing Hormone ◽  
Pulse Generator ◽  
Surrogate Marker ◽  
Secretory Activity ◽  
Pulse Amplitude ◽  
True Positive Rate ◽  
Α Subunit ◽  
Precise Control ◽  
Positive Rate ◽  
Fast Pulse

A pulsatile pattern of GnRH stimulation is essential for normal secretion of luteinizing hormone (LH), while both continuous and fast-frequency GnRH stimulation result in a paradoxical decrease in gonadotrope responsiveness known as desensitization. Under physiological conditions there is striking concordance between the pulsatile secretion of LH and the glycoprotein free α-subunit (FAS). The aims of this study were to determine whether the FAS response to GnRH is also decreased at fast frequencies of GnRH stimulation and whether FAS is superior to LH as a marker of GnRH secretory activity at fast-pulse frequencies. The model of GnRH-deficient men was chosen to permit precise control of the dose and frequency of GnRH stimulation of the gonadotrope. The frequency of iv administration of GnRH to 5 GnRH-deficient men was progressively increased from every 120 to every 60 min, from 60 to 30 min, and from 30 to 15 min during three 12-h admissions, 1 week apart. The bolus dose of GnRH remained constant and was set at that dose previously shown to produce physiological concentrations and amplitudes of LH secretion and normal testosterone levels. As the frequency of GnRH stimulation was increased, a progressive rise in mean FAS levels was noted (353 ± 13, 448 ± 42, 466± 50, and 698 ± 85 ng/L [mean ± sem] for 120, 60, 30, and 15 min intervals; P < 0.005). However, normalization of mean FAS levels to account for the increase in total GnRH delivered with increasing frequencies revealed a progressive decrease in pituitary responsiveness to each GnRH bolus with increasing frequency of stimulation (353 ± 13, 224 ± 21, 117 ± 13, 87 ± 11 ng/L; P < 0.001). The decrease in normalized mean levels was supported by a decrease in the FAS pulse amplitude with increasing frequency (517± 53, 365 ± 50, 176 ± 29 ng/L for 120, 60, and 30 min intervals, respectively; P < 0.005). At interpulse intervals of 120 and 60 min, there was complete concordance of LH and FAS pulses in response to GnRH. However, at the 30-min frequency FAS proved to be a better marker of GnRH with a higher true positive rate and lower number of false positives than LH (P < 0.05). At all frequencies, the number of false positive pulses detected tended to be lower for FAS than for LH (P = 0.06). From these data we conclude that FAS is subject to desensitization in response to increasing frequencies of GnRH administration in GnRH-deficient men, but is superior to LH as a surrogate marker of GnRH pulse generator activity at fast pulse frequencies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document