The challenge of change: change mechanisms - the measurment of people, process and product

1999 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.J. Harding
Keyword(s):  
Change Mechanisms

Risk for psychotherapy drop-out in survival analysis: The influence of general change mechanisms and symptom severity.

2020 ◽  
Vol 67 (6) ◽  
pp. 712-722
Author(s):  
Sebastian Gmeinwieser ◽  
Kai Sebastian Schneider ◽  
Maximilian Bardo ◽  
Timo Brockmeyer ◽  
York Hagmayer
Keyword(s):  
Survival Analysis ◽  
Symptom Severity ◽  
Drop Out ◽  
General Change ◽  
Change Mechanisms

scholarly journals Institutional-Political Scenarios for Anthropocene Society

2018 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew J. Hoffman ◽  
P. Devereaux Jennings
Keyword(s):  
Social Science ◽  
Institutional Theory ◽  
Human Activity ◽  
Natural Environment ◽  
Environmental Sustainability ◽  
Social Sustainability ◽  
New Paradigm ◽  
Change Mechanisms ◽  
Main Change

Natural scientists have proposed that humankind has entered a new geologic epoch. Termed the “Anthropocene,” this new reality revolves around the central role of human activity in multiple Earth ecosystems. That challenge requires a rethinking of social science explanations of organization and environment relationships. In this article, we discuss the need to politicize institutional theory as a means understanding “Anthropocene Society,” and in turn what that resultant society means for the Anthropocene in the natural environment. We modify the constitutive elements of institutional orders and a set of main change mechanisms to explore three scenarios around which future Anthropocene Societies might be built—Collapsing Systems, Market Rules, and Cultural Re-Enlightenment. Simultaneously, we use observations from the Anthropocene to expose limitations in present institutional theory and propose extensions to remedy them. Overall, this article challenges organizational scholars to consider a new paradigm under which research in environmental sustainability and social sustainability takes place.

The promises and pitfalls of path dependence frameworks for analyzing penal change

2021 ◽  
pp. 146247452110435
Author(s):  
Ashley T Rubin
Keyword(s):  
Institutional Change ◽  
Political Science ◽  
Path Dependence ◽  
Historical Sociology ◽  
Mechanisms Of Change ◽  
Feedback Effects ◽  
Exogenous Shocks ◽  
Change Mechanisms ◽  
Theoretical Developments

Although the study of penal changes throughout history is central to punishment studies, the field has taken little from historical institutionalists’ theories of institutional change. One of the most relevant such theories is path dependence. This article outlines path dependence frameworks’ most fruitful elements for studying penal change. Drawing on foundational political science and historical sociology texts, as well as several punishment scholars’ works, this article highlights the advantages of thinking through stasis and change, mechanisms of inertia such as feedback effects, and exogenous shocks. While path dependence offers a powerful framework, it can also be an unsatisfying explanation at times, particularly when path dependence is itself a seemingly uphill battle, when apparent stasis hides ongoing change, or when institutions survive hypothesized mechanisms of change. This paper closes by discussing some ways in which punishment scholars can strengthen the path dependence framework by blending it with recent theoretical developments in the punishment studies field.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document