scholarly journals Multi‐scale audio super resolution via deep pyramid wavelet convolutional neural network

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Binqiang Si ◽  
Dongqi Luo ◽  
Jihong Zhu
Keyword(s):  
Neural Network ◽  
Convolutional Neural Network ◽  
Super Resolution ◽  
Multi Scale

Learning depth super-resolution by using multi-scale convolutional neural network

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 1773-1783 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masoumeh Zareapoor ◽  
Pourya Shamsolmoali ◽  
Jie Yang
Keyword(s):  
Neural Network ◽  
Convolutional Neural Network ◽  
Super Resolution ◽  
Multi Scale

scholarly journals Super-resolution reconstruction of seismic section image via multi-scale convolution neural network

2021 ◽  
Vol 303 ◽  
pp. 01058
Author(s):  
Meng-Di Deng ◽  
Rui-Sheng Jia ◽  
Hong-Mei Sun ◽  
Xing-Li Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Neural Network ◽  
High Resolution ◽  
Convolutional Neural Network ◽  
Super Resolution ◽  
Image Features ◽  
Image Feature ◽  
Reconstruction Method ◽  
Low Resolution ◽  
Seismic Section ◽  
Multi Scale

The resolution of seismic section images can directly affect the subsequent interpretation of seismic data. In order to improve the spatial resolution of low-resolution seismic section images, a super-resolution reconstruction method based on multi-scale convolution is proposed. This method designs a multi-scale convolutional neural network to learn high-low resolution image feature pairs, and realizes mapping learning from low-resolution seismic section images to high-resolution seismic section images. This multi-scale convolutional neural network model consists of four convolutional layers and a sub-pixel convolutional layer. Convolution operations are used to learn abundant seismic section image features, and sub-pixel convolution layer is used to reconstruct high-resolution seismic section image. The experimental results show that the proposed method is superior to the comparison method in peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and structural similarity (SSIM). In the total training time and reconstruction time, our method is about 22% less than the FSRCNN method and about 18% less than the ESPCN method.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document