Recursive digital filter for fast visual evoked potential estimation and classification

2001 ◽  
Vol 37 (15) ◽  
pp. 990 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Palaniappan ◽  
P. Raveendran
Keyword(s):  
Digital Filter ◽  
Visual Evoked Potential ◽  
Evoked Potential ◽  
Recursive Digital Filter ◽  
Evoked Potential Estimation ◽  
Visual Evoked

Visual evoked potential estimation of visual activity with a Laplacian derivation

1992 ◽  
Vol 79 (4) ◽  
pp. 383-389 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander P. A. Beers ◽  
Frans C. C. Riemslag ◽  
Henk Spekreijse
Keyword(s):  
Visual Evoked Potential ◽  
Evoked Potential ◽  
Visual Activity ◽  
Evoked Potential Estimation ◽  
Laplacian Derivation ◽  
Visual Evoked

Olfactory Modulation of Steady- State Visual Evoked Potential Topography in Comparison with Differences in Odor Sensitivity

2002 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 71-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline M. Owen ◽  
John Patterson ◽  
Richard B. Silberstein
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Visual Evoked Potential ◽  
Evoked Potential ◽  
Behavioral Responses ◽  
Simultaneous Recording ◽  
Odor Concentration ◽  
Odor Detection ◽  
Detection Response ◽  
Response Groups ◽  
Visual Evoked

Summary Research was undertaken to determine whether olfactory stimulation can alter steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP) topography. Odor-air and air-only stimuli were used to determine whether the SSVEP would be altered when odor was present. Comparisons were also made of the topographic activation associated with air and odor stimulation, with the view toward determining whether the revealed topographic activity would differentiate levels of olfactory sensitivity by clearly identifying supra- and subthreshold odor responses. Using a continuous respiration olfactometer (CRO) to precisely deliver an odor or air stimulus synchronously with the natural respiration, air or odor (n-butanol) was randomly delivered into the inspiratory airstream during the simultaneous recording of SSVEPs and subjective behavioral responses. Subjects were placed in groups based on subjective odor detection response: “yes” and “no” detection groups. In comparison to air, SSVEP topography revealed cortical changes in response to odor stimulation for both response groups, with topographic changes evident for those unable to perceive the odor, showing the presence of a subconscious physiological odor detection response. Differences in regional SSVEP topography were shown for those who reported smelling the odor compared with those who remained unaware of the odor. These changes revealed olfactory modulation of SSVEP topography related to odor awareness and sensitivity and therefore odor concentration relative to thresholds.

Visual Evoked potential signal processing and analysis for normal and galucomic eyes

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 2106-2121
Author(s):  
Hamed Ibrahem Abdelkader ◽  
Mona Abdelkader ◽  
Mohammed Kabeel ◽  
Malak Alya
Keyword(s):  
Evoked Potentials ◽  
Visual Evoked Potential ◽  
Evoked Potential ◽  
Optic Tract ◽  
Pattern Reversal ◽  
Blue Color ◽  
Check Size ◽  
Retinal Stimulation ◽  
Normal Individuals ◽  
Visual Evoked

Visual evoked potentials (VEPS) are obtained from optic tract by recording the evoked potentials generated by retinal stimulation. The flash VEP (FVEP) is used less frequently than pattern reversal VEP (PRVEP) because; it shows great variation in both latency and amplitude. The present study was undertaken to evaluate the effect of change of wavelength of flash and change of check size on the parameters of visual evoked potential (amplitude and latency) in normal individuals and glaucoma patients. The group of healthy subjects in the age of 20-45 years while the group of glaucoma subjects where  in the age of 25-50 years.  The two groups were exposed to flash VEP with white light and blue color and they also were exposed to checks subtending a visual angles of 15, 30,60 and 120 minutes of arc. The measured data were statistically analyzed and summarized by histograms. The interindividual and intraindividual in latencies and amplitudes for FVEP were assessed using  the coefficient of variation (COV). In conclusion, monochromatic flash VEP was preferred than white as there were minimal inter and intra individual variation of latencies and amplitudes. The most preferred check size in PRVEP was 120' for  the two groups.  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document