scholarly journals Fiber Fabry-Perot tunable filter for high-speed optical packet switching

1997 ◽  
Author(s):  
N.L. Taranenko ◽  
S.C. Tenbrink ◽  
K. Hsu ◽  
C.M. Miller
Keyword(s):  
High Speed ◽  
Packet Switching ◽  
Tunable Filter ◽  
Optical Packet Switching ◽  
Fabry Perot

Optical Burst Switch as a New Switching Paradigm for High-Speed Internet

2009 ◽  
pp. 1122-1129
Author(s):  
Joel J.P.C. Rodrigues ◽  
Mário M. Freire ◽  
Paulo P. Monteiro ◽  
Pascal Lorenz
Keyword(s):  
High Speed ◽  
Packet Switching ◽  
Optical Packet Switching ◽  
Destination Node ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Circuit Switching ◽  
Burst Switching ◽  
Data Control ◽  
Optical Buffering ◽  
Optical Burst

The concept of burst switching was initially proposed in the context of voice communications by Haselton (1983) and Amstutz (1983, 1989) in the early 1980s. More recently, in the late 1990s, optical burst switching (OBS) has been proposed as a new switching paradigm for the so-called optical Internet, in order to overcome the technical limitations of optical packet switching, namely the lack of optical random access memory (optical RAM) and to the problems with synchronization (Baldine, Rouskas, Perros, & Stevenson, 2002; Chen, Qiao, & Yu, 2004; Qiao & Yoo, 1999; Turner, 1999; Yoo & Qiao, 1997; Xu, Perros, & Rouskas, 2001). OBS is a technical compromise between wavelength routing and optical packet switching, since it does not require optical buffering or packet-level processing as in optical packet switching, and it is more efficient than circuit switching if the traffic volume does not require a full wavelength channel. According to Dolzer, Gauger, Späth, and Bodamer (2001), OBS has the following characteristics: • Granularity—the transmission unit size (burst) of OBS is between the optical circuit switching and optical packet switching; • Separation between control and data—control information (header) and data are transmitted on a different wavelengths (or channels) with some time interval; • Allocation of resources—resources are allocated using mainly one-way reservation schemes. A source node does not need to wait for the acknowledge message from destination node to start transmitting the burst; • Variable burst length—the burst size is variable; • No optical buffering—burst switching does not require optical buffering at the intermediate nodes (without any delay).

Design and Analysis of Optical Packet Switch Routers

2017 ◽  
pp. 118-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vaibhav Shukla ◽  
Aruna Jain
Keyword(s):  
Wavelength Division Multiplexing ◽  
High Speed ◽  
Packet Switching ◽  
Data Transfer ◽  
Optical Packet Switching ◽  
Bandwidth Utilization ◽  
Wavelength Division ◽  
Optical Packet Switch ◽  
Switch Architectures ◽  
Packet Switch

Optical packet switching is connectionless networking solution through which we can get high speed data transfer and optimum bandwidth utilization using wavelength division multiplexing technique. For realizing optical packet switching the numbers of optical packet switch architectures are available in market. In this chapter the authors discuss the overall development of optical packet switching; some recently published optical packet switch architectures are discussed in the chapter and a comparison is performed between the switches through loss, cost and buffer analysis.

Use of a fiber Fabry-Perot tunable filter for high-speed optical packet switching: towards an experimental prototype

1998 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina L. Taranenko ◽  
Stephen C. Tenbrink ◽  
Kevin Hsu ◽  
Calvin M. Miller ◽  
Yufei Bao
Keyword(s):  
High Speed ◽  
Packet Switching ◽  
Tunable Filter ◽  
Optical Packet Switching ◽  
Experimental Prototype ◽  
Fabry Perot
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document