Multi-objective optimization of wind turbine via controllers coordination and sensitivity analysis

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhenyu Chen ◽  
Zhongwei Lin ◽  
Chuanxi Wang ◽  
Xiangyu Han ◽  
Gengda Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Wind Turbine ◽  
Multi Objective Optimization ◽  
Multi Objective

Investigation, sensitivity analysis, and multi-objective optimization of effective parameters on temperature and force in robotic drilling cortical bone

2017 ◽  
Vol 231 (11) ◽  
pp. 1012-1024 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vahid Tahmasbi ◽  
Majid Ghoreishi ◽  
Mojtaba Zolfaghari
Keyword(s):  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Feed Rate ◽  
Process Temperature ◽  
Drilling Process ◽  
Drilling Speed ◽  
Multi Objective Optimization ◽  
Bone Drilling ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Tool Diameter ◽  
First Time

The bone drilling process is very prominent in orthopedic surgeries and in the repair of bone fractures. It is also very common in dentistry and bone sampling operations. Due to the complexity of bone and the sensitivity of the process, bone drilling is one of the most important and sensitive processes in biomedical engineering. Orthopedic surgeries can be improved using robotic systems and mechatronic tools. The most crucial problem during drilling is an unwanted increase in process temperature (higher than 47 °C), which causes thermal osteonecrosis or cell death and local burning of the bone tissue. Moreover, imposing higher forces to the bone may lead to breaking or cracking and consequently cause serious damage. In this study, a mathematical second-order linear regression model as a function of tool drilling speed, feed rate, tool diameter, and their effective interactions is introduced to predict temperature and force during the bone drilling process. This model can determine the maximum speed of surgery that remains within an acceptable temperature range. Moreover, for the first time, using designed experiments, the bone drilling process was modeled, and the drilling speed, feed rate, and tool diameter were optimized. Then, using response surface methodology and applying a multi-objective optimization, drilling force was minimized to sustain an acceptable temperature range without damaging the bone or the surrounding tissue. In addition, for the first time, Sobol statistical sensitivity analysis is used to ascertain the effect of process input parameters on process temperature and force. The results show that among all effective input parameters, tool rotational speed, feed rate, and tool diameter have the highest influence on process temperature and force, respectively. The behavior of each output parameters with variation in each input parameter is further investigated. Finally, a multi-objective optimization has been performed considering all the aforementioned parameters. This optimization yielded a set of data that can considerably improve orthopedic osteosynthesis outcomes.

scholarly journals Multi-Objective Robust Optimization Using a Postoptimality Sensitivity Analysis Technique: Application to a Wind Turbine Design

2015 ◽  
Vol 137 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Weijun Wang ◽  
Stéphane Caro ◽  
Fouad Bennis ◽  
Ricardo Soto ◽  
Broderick Crawford
Keyword(s):  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Robust Optimization ◽  
Wind Turbine ◽  
Optimization Design ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Design Environment ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Pareto Ranking ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Robust Optimization Design

Toward a multi-objective optimization robust problem, the variations in design variables (DVs) and design environment parameters (DEPs) include the small variations and the large variations. The former have small effect on the performance functions and/or the constraints, and the latter refer to the ones that have large effect on the performance functions and/or the constraints. The robustness of performance functions is discussed in this paper. A postoptimality sensitivity analysis technique for multi-objective robust optimization problems (MOROPs) is discussed, and two robustness indices (RIs) are introduced. The first one considers the robustness of the performance functions to small variations in the DVs and the DEPs. The second RI characterizes the robustness of the performance functions to large variations in the DEPs. It is based on the ability of a solution to maintain a good Pareto ranking for different DEPs due to large variations. The robustness of the solutions is treated as vectors in the robustness function space (RF-Space), which is defined by the two proposed RIs. As a result, the designer can compare the robustness of all Pareto optimal solutions and make a decision. Finally, two illustrative examples are given to highlight the contributions of this paper. The first example is about a numerical problem, whereas the second problem deals with the multi-objective robust optimization design of a floating wind turbine.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document