Checklist for Assessing Graduate Student Competencies in Voice Disorders

2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 95-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy F. Teten ◽  
Shari L. DeVeney ◽  
Mary J. Friehe
Keyword(s):  
Graduate Student ◽  
Course Design ◽  
Training Programs ◽  
Student Perception ◽  
Voice Disorders ◽  
Speech Language Pathology ◽  
Fluency Disorders ◽  
Language Pathology ◽  
Low Incidence ◽  
Student Competencies

Low-incidence clinical disorders such as voice, nasal resonance, and fluency present challenging areas for graduate-level speech-language pathology training programs to help students acquire necessary knowledge and skills. A checklist of competencies for fluency disorders exists in the literature. The authors are presently collecting pretest/posttest data on the fluency disorders checklist over several cohorts of graduate students to determine student level of proficiency and confidence regarding these competencies. Preliminary data analysis suggests significant student perception of growth as a result of completing course requirements. These data have been useful to the second author, who teaches a course in fluency disorders and utilizes the checklist for purposes of course design and case-based project development to help students gain competence. The authors observed that a similar checklist of competencies for voice disorders would be useful for training programs as well as for other reasons described throughout this paper. Consequently, the authors compiled a checklist for assessing graduate student competencies for voice disorders. This checklist provides academic and clinical faculty with a comprehensive tool to guide the education of graduate clinicians and assist in the assurance of educational quality for speech-language pathologists.

Supervisory Practices in Speech - Language Pathology: Pre-practicum Assessment of Student Clinicians in Graduate Training Programs

2009 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 107-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel E. Phillips
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Graduate Student ◽  
Training Programs ◽  
Graduate Training ◽  
Speech Language Pathology ◽  
Clinical Educators ◽  
Qualitative Research Methodology ◽  
Language Pathology ◽  
Graduate Training Programs ◽  
Supervisory Practices

Abstract How do supervisors determine the level of clinical independence of graduate student clinicians before clinic practicum begins and how do supervisors determine the style of supervision used with each student clinician? A qualitative research methodology was used to investigate supervisory practices of clinical educators supervising graduate student clinicians in speech-language pathology graduate training programs. Data was gathered through standardized open-ended interviews with 11 supervisors from five graduate training programs accredited by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA). All 11 supervisors conducted a pre-practicum assessment, but none used a published program or model to assess the student clinicians. All participants met with the student clinicians prior to the start of therapy to discuss the client. Analysis of data revealed three distinct types of meetings: presentation of the client by the clinician, presentation of the clinician to the supervisor, and pre-practicum assessment using a form. Eight of the 11 supervisors interviewed for this study determined the level of clinical independence of the student clinician solely by asking the clinician to present the client to the supervisor. The supervisors then evaluated the manner, organization, accuracy, and completeness of the presentation to estimate the student's level of clinical independence.

Identification and Remediation of At-Risk Student Clinicians in Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology

2008 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-31
Author(s):  
Martha Wilder Wilson ◽  
Elizabeth Zylla-Jones
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Training Programs ◽  
Professional Services ◽  
Speech Language Pathology ◽  
High Quality ◽  
The Public ◽  
Language Pathology ◽  
Remediation Plan ◽  
University Training ◽  
At Risk Student

Abstract The goal of university training programs is to educate speech-language pathology and audiology students to become competent and independent practitioners, with the ability to provide high quality and professional services to the public. This article describes the behaviors of “at-risk” student clinicians, so they may be identified early in their practica and remediation may be implemented. The importance of establishing a student at-risk protocol is discussed as well as a remediation plan for these students. This article summarized the Auburn University Speech and Hearing Clinic’s Student At-Risk Protocol, which may serve as a model for university training programs. The challenges of implementing such a protocol are also discussed.

The Graduate Dysphagia Course: Opening the Door to New Frontiers

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (13) ◽  
pp. 104-112
Author(s):  
Karen A. Ball ◽  
Luis F. Riquelme
Keyword(s):  
Graduate Student ◽  
Paradigm Shifts ◽  
Speech Language Pathology ◽  
Approaches To Teaching ◽  
Graduate Level ◽  
Graduate Curriculum ◽  
Current Trends ◽  
Language Pathology

A graduate-level course in dysphagia is an integral part of the graduate curriculum in speech-language pathology. There are many challenges to meeting the needs of current graduate student clinicians, thus requiring the instructor to explore alternatives. These challenges, suggested paradigm shifts, and potential available solutions are explored. Current trends, lack of evidence for current methods, and the variety of approaches to teaching the dysphagia course are presented.

A Proposal to Establish Standardized Learning Outcomes for Resonance Across Graduate Programs in Speech-Language Pathology

2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-26
Author(s):  
Helen M. Sharp ◽  
Mary O'Gara
Keyword(s):  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Training Programs ◽  
Graduate Training ◽  
Graduate Programs ◽  
Core Knowledge ◽  
Speech Language Pathology ◽  
Entry Level ◽  
The Public ◽  
Language Pathology ◽  
Graduate Training Programs

The Council for Clinical Certification in Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology (CCFC) sets accreditation standards and these standards list broad domains of knowledge with specific coverage of “the appropriate etiologies, characteristics, anatomical/physiological, acoustic, psychological, developmental, and linguistic and cultural correlates” and assessment, intervention, and methods of prevention for each domain” (CCFC, 2013, “Standard IV-C”). One domain in the 2014 standards is “voice and resonance.” Studies of graduate training programs suggest that fewer programs require coursework in cleft palate, the course in which resonance was traditionally taught. The purpose of this paper is to propose a standardized learning outcomes specific to resonance that would achieve the minimum knowledge required for all entry-level professionals in speech-language pathology. Graduate programs and faculty should retain flexibility and creativity in how these learning outcomes are achieved. Shared learning objectives across programs would serve programs, faculty, students, accreditation site visitors, and the public in assuring that a consistent, minimum core knowledge is achieved across graduate training programs. Proficiency in the management of individuals with resonance disorders would require additional knowledge and skills.

Otolaryngology utilization of speech-language pathology services for voice disorders

2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (4) ◽  
pp. 906-912 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seth M. Cohen ◽  
Michaela A. Dinan ◽  
Jaewhan Kim ◽  
Nelson Roy
Keyword(s):  
Voice Disorders ◽  
Speech Language Pathology ◽  
Language Pathology

An Exploration of Mindfulness in Speech-Language Pathology

2020 ◽  
pp. 152574012094214
Author(s):  
Angela M. Medina ◽  
Jean S. Mead
Keyword(s):  
Business Education ◽  
Speech Therapy ◽  
Education Law ◽  
Speech Language Pathology ◽  
Client Outcomes ◽  
Fluency Disorders ◽  
Measuring Change ◽  
Mindfulness Practices ◽  
Language Pathology ◽  
Improve Patient

For decades, mindfulness practices have been studied and applied across professions such as health care, business, education, law, and counseling as a means to reduce workforce stress and improve patient/client outcomes. Literature describing applications and outcomes of mindfulness has been growing in the field of speech-language pathology. While there is an abundance of work on treating fluency disorders as well as adult cognitive and language deficits, reports of the successful application of mindfulness techniques in the service area domain of voice are expanding. The purpose of this article is to describe mindfulness and how mindfulness techniques are currently being applied in the practice of speech-language pathology with clients as well as parents and caregivers of clients. Suggested mindfulness activities and means for measuring change in the context of speech therapy are described.

Interprofessional Education for BSW Students: A Pilot Course

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-70
Author(s):  
Claire M. Edwards ◽  
Jason M. Newell
Keyword(s):  
Social Work ◽  
Interprofessional Education ◽  
Liberal Arts ◽  
Professional Training ◽  
Allied Health ◽  
Training Programs ◽  
Speech Language Pathology ◽  
Professional Programs ◽  
Health Professional Training ◽  
Language Pathology

The focus on interprofessional education (IPE) for professional training programs in allied health professions such as social work has increased recently. There is limited pedagogical literature regarding either the instruction or application of IPE in any given profession. Based on a co-teaching model of instruction, this article delineates the preparation and integration process of a pilot course on IPE. The pilot course was taught at a small liberal arts college where it was cross-listed in two undergraduate professional programs in social work and speech-language pathology. This article discusses the relevance of including IPE in allied health professional training programs. Additionally, this article outlines the timeline for developing and implementing the course, from conceptualization to the integration phases including implications from student evaluations of their experience in the course. Elements of the course including delivery, descriptions of assignments, and projects also are discussed.

Different Clinical Perspectives of Good and Poor Therapy Sessions

1987 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 335-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanne Erwick Roberts ◽  
Vicki McCready
Keyword(s):  
Graduate Student ◽  
Clinical Training ◽  
Causal Attributions ◽  
Therapy Session ◽  
Speech Language Pathology ◽  
Training Process ◽  
Observer Bias ◽  
Language Pathology ◽  
Therapy Sessions

This study investigated differences in causal attributions made by student clinicians taking actor and observer roles in good and poor therapy Sessions. One hundred thirty-four graduate student clinicians in speech-language pathology were asked to imagine a hypothetical good or poor therapy session in which they took either the role of a clinician working with a client in a session or that of a clinician observing the session. To account for the session's hypothesized outcomes, clinicians taking the actor role cited client causes more frequently than other causes while clinicians taking the observer role cited clinician causes. These results are consistent with the actor-observer bias documented extensively in the psychological and educational literatures. Clinicians' causal attributions also differed for good and poor therapy sessions. Implications are discussed in terms of possible impact on the clinical training process in speech-language pathology.

The Efficacy of Speech-Language Pathology Intervention: Voice Disorders

1990 ◽  
Vol 11 (04) ◽  
pp. 297-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Hillman ◽  
Carla DeLassus Gress ◽  
Joan Hargrave ◽  
Michael Walsh ◽  
Glenn Bunting
Keyword(s):  
Voice Disorders ◽  
Speech Language Pathology ◽  
Language Pathology
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document