Part 2. Cleft Lip and Palate in the Developing World: Speech-Language Pathology Service Delivery Models

2007 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 16-20
Author(s):  
Debbie Sell
Keyword(s):  
Service Delivery ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Developing World ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Speech Language Pathology ◽  
Service Delivery Models ◽  
Language Pathology ◽  
Delivery Models

Reimbursement and Telepractice

2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 35-40
Author(s):  
Carol Dudding
Keyword(s):  
Service Delivery ◽  
Healthcare Services ◽  
Speech Language Pathology ◽  
Delivery Method ◽  
Quality Healthcare ◽  
Service Delivery Models ◽  
Private Lives ◽  
Language Pathology ◽  
Delivery Models

Whether in our professional or private lives, we are all aware of the system wide efforts to provide quality healthcare services while containing the costs. Telemedicine as a method of service delivery has expanded as a result of changes in reimbursement and service delivery models. The growth and sustainability of telehealth within speech-language pathology and audiology, like any other service, depends on the ability to be reimbursed for services provided. Currently, reimbursement for services delivered via telehealth is variable and depends on numerous factors. An understanding of these factors and a willingness to advocate for increased reimbursement can bolster the success of practitioners interested in the telehealth as a service delivery method.

Nasalance-Based Preclassification of Oral–Nasal Balance Disorders Results in Higher Agreement of Expert Listeners’ Auditory-Perceptual Assessments: Results of a Retrospective Listening Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 57 (4) ◽  
pp. 448-457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gillian de Boer ◽  
Viviane Christina de Castro Marino ◽  
Jeniffer de Cassia Rillo Dutka ◽  
Maria Inês Pegoraro-Krook ◽  
Tim Bressmann
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Diagnostic Category ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Speech Language Pathology ◽  
Balance Disorders ◽  
Persistent Problem ◽  
Instrumental Assessment ◽  
Audio Recordings ◽  
Language Pathology

Objective: Reliable perceptual and instrumental assessment of oral–nasal balance disorders is a persistent problem in speech-language pathology. The goal of the study was to evaluate whether nasalance-based preclassification of oral–nasal balance disorders improves listener agreement. Design: Retrospective listening study. Setting: Tertiary university hospital. Participants: Fifty-four randomly selected recordings of patients with repaired unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP). Three experienced speech-language pathologists participated as expert listeners. Interventions: Two listening experiments were based on nasalance scores and audio recordings of speakers with repaired UCLP. The speakers were preclassified as normal, hypernasal, hyponasal, or mixed based on their nasalance scores. Initially, the listeners determined the diagnostic category of the oral–nasal balance for 62 audio recordings (8 repeats). Six months later, they listened to 38 of the recordings (6 repeats) along with a spreadsheet indicating the nasalance-based categories for the oral–nasal balance. The listeners confirmed, or rejected and corrected, the nasalance-based preclassification. Main Outcome Measures: Intralistener, interlistener agreement, and agreement between listener categories and nasalance-based oral–nasal balance categories. Results: In the first study, the agreement between the listeners’ diagnostic category and the nasalance-based category was 45.1% and the interlistener agreement was 36.7%. In the second study, the agreement between the listeners’ category and the nasalance-based category was 67.1% (75% agreement for the correct nasalance-based categories and 41.7% for the misclassifications), and the interlistener agreement was 85.4%. Conclusions: Preclassification of oral–nasal balance disorders based on nasalance scores may help listeners achieve better diagnostic accuracy and higher agreement.

scholarly journals Service Delivery Models to Maximize Quality of Life for Older People at the End of Life: A Rapid Review

2019 ◽  
Vol 97 (1) ◽  
pp. 113-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
CATHERINE J. EVANS ◽  
LUCY ISON ◽  
CLARE ELLIS‐SMITH ◽  
CAROLINE NICHOLSON ◽  
ALESSIA COSTA ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Service Delivery ◽  
Older People ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Rapid Review ◽  
Service Delivery Models ◽  
Delivery Models

scholarly journals Eye care delivery models to improve access to eye care for Indigenous peoples in high-income countries: a scoping review

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. e004484
Author(s):  
Helen Burn ◽  
Lisa Hamm ◽  
Joanna Black ◽  
Anthea Burnett ◽  
Matire Harwood ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Service Delivery ◽  
Indigenous Peoples ◽  
Indigenous Communities ◽  
High Income ◽  
Eye Care ◽  
Service Delivery Models ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Delivery Models ◽  
Improve Access

PurposeGlobally, there are ~370 million Indigenous peoples. Indigenous peoples typically experience worse health compared with non-Indigenous people, including higher rates of avoidable vision impairment. Much of this gap in eye health can be attributed to barriers that impede access to eye care services. We conducted a scoping review to identify and summarise service delivery models designed to improve access to eye care for Indigenous peoples in high-income countries.MethodsSearches were conducted on MEDLINE, Embase and Global Health in January 2019 and updated in July 2020. All study designs were eligible if they described a model of eye care service delivery aimed at populations with over 50% Indigenous peoples. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts and full-text articles and completed data charting. We extracted data on publication details, study context, service delivery interventions, outcomes and evaluations, engagement with Indigenous peoples and access dimensions targeted. We summarised findings descriptively following thematic analysis.ResultsWe screened 2604 abstracts and 67 studies fulfilled our eligibility criteria. Studies were focused on Indigenous peoples in Australia (n=45), USA (n=11), Canada (n=7), New Zealand (n=2), Taiwan (n=1) and Greenland (n=1). The main disease focus was diabetic retinopathy (n=30, 45%), followed by ‘all eye care’ (n=16, 24%). Most studies focused on targeted interventions to increase availability of services. Fewer than one-third of studies reported involving Indigenous communities when designing the service. 41 studies reflected on whether the model improved access, but none undertook rigorous evaluation or quantitative assessment.ConclusionsThe geographical and clinical scope of service delivery models to improve access to eye care for Indigenous peoples in high-income countries is narrow, with most studies focused on Australia and services for diabetic retinopathy. More and better engagement with Indigenous communities is required to design and implement accessible eye care services.

Serving transgender people: clinical care considerations and service delivery models in transgender health

The Lancet ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 388 (10042) ◽  
pp. 401-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevan Wylie ◽  
Gail Knudson ◽  
Sharful Islam Khan ◽  
Mireille Bonierbale ◽  
Suporn Watanyusakul ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Service Delivery ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Transgender People ◽  
Transgender Health ◽  
Service Delivery Models ◽  
Delivery Models

Comparison of Two Service Delivery Models

1989 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 49-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin N. Cole ◽  
Susan R. Harris ◽  
Sheila F. Eland ◽  
Paulette E. Mills
Keyword(s):  
Service Delivery ◽  
Service Delivery Models ◽  
Delivery Models
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document