The Influence of Selected Masking Noises on Lombard and Sidetone Amplification Effects

1976 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 523-535 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon F. Garber ◽  
Gerald M. Siegel ◽  
Herbert L. Pick ◽  
Stephen R. Alcorn
Keyword(s):  
College Students ◽  
Frequency Band ◽  
Background Noise ◽  
Speech Intelligibility ◽  
Normal Hearing ◽  
Frequency Bands ◽  
Amplification Effect ◽  
Vocal Intensity

The present experiments were designed to test the notion that the Lombard and sidetone amplification effects are related to the masking ability of a presented background noise. In Experiment 1, eight normal-hearing college students spoke in quiet and while listening to five frequency bands of noise which were equated for intensity but differed in ability to interfere with speech intelligibility. Vocal intensity increased as the frequency band, and thus the masking ability of the noise increased. In Experiment 2, eight additional students spoke in quiet and while listening to four of the frequency bands of noise used in Experiment 1. The noises were equated for loudness rather than intensity. Again, vocal intensity increased as the masking ability of the noise increased. In Experiment 3, 20 additional students spoke while listening to 0 and 20 dB of sidetone amplification mixed with three of the noise bands from Experiment 1. The noises were equated for intensity and mixed with sidetone. The sidetone amplification effect increased as the masking ability of the noise increased. The results of these experiments indicate that interference with speech intelligibility is directly related to elicitation of the Lombard and sidetone amplification effects. The loudness or intensity of a noise has little control over vocal intensity independent of the contribution to masking of speech.

Effects of Speech Rate, Background Noise, and Simulated Hearing Loss on Speech Rate Judgment and Speech Intelligibility in Young Listeners

2009 ◽  
Vol 20 (01) ◽  
pp. 028-039 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth M. Adams ◽  
Robert E. Moore
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Research Design ◽  
Background Noise ◽  
Speech Intelligibility ◽  
Signal To Noise Ratio ◽  
Speech Rate ◽  
Normal Hearing ◽  
Moderate Correlation ◽  
Signal To Noise ◽  
Noise Ratio

Purpose: To study the effect of noise on speech rate judgment and signal-to-noise ratio threshold (SNR50) at different speech rates (slow, preferred, and fast). Research Design: Speech rate judgment and SNR50 tasks were completed in a normal-hearing condition and a simulated hearing-loss condition. Study Sample: Twenty-four female and six male young, normal-hearing participants. Results: Speech rate judgment was not affected by background noise regardless of hearing condition. Results of the SNR50 task indicated that, as speech rate increased, performance decreased for both hearing conditions. There was a moderate correlation between speech rate judgment and SNR50 with the various speech rates, such that as judgment of speech rate increased from too slow to too fast, performance deteriorated. Conclusions: These findings can be used to support the need for counseling patients and their families about the potential advantages to using average speech rates or rates that are slightly slowed while conversing in the presence of background noise.

Effect of Synchronized Linked Band Selection on Speech Intelligibility of Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tom Gajęcki ◽  
Waldo Nogueira
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Background Noise ◽  
Speech Intelligibility ◽  
Signal To Noise Ratio ◽  
Normal Hearing ◽  
Band Selection ◽  
Signal To Noise ◽  
Intelligibility Test ◽  
Bilateral Cochlear Implant

Normal hearing listeners have the ability to exploit the audio input perceived by each ear to extract target information in challenging listening scenarios. Bilateral cochlear implant (BiCI) users, however, do not benefit as much as normal hearing listeners do from a bilateral input. In this study, we investigate the effect that bilaterally linked band selection, bilaterally synchronized electrical stimulation and ideal binary masks (IdBMs) have on the ability of 10 BiCIs to understand speech in background noise. The performance was assessed through a sentence-based speech intelligibility test, in a scenario where the speech signal was presented from the front and the interfering noise from one side. The linked band selection relies on the most favorable signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) ear, which will select the bands to be stimulated for both CIs. Results show that no benefit from adding a second CI to the most favorable SNR side was achieved for any of the tested bilateral conditions. However, when using both devices, speech perception results show that performing linked band selection, besides delivering bilaterally synchronized electrical stimulation, leads to an improvement compared to standard clinical setups. Moreover, the outcomes of this work show that by applying IdBMs, subjects achieve speech intelligibility scores similar to the ones without background noise.

Improving Speech Intelligibility in Background Noise with an Adaptive Directional Microphone

2006 ◽  
Vol 17 (07) ◽  
pp. 519-530 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter J. Blamey ◽  
Hayley J. Fiket ◽  
Brenton R. Steele
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Aids ◽  
Background Noise ◽  
Speech Intelligibility ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Normal Hearing ◽  
Directional Microphones ◽  
Directional Microphone ◽  
Hearing In Noise ◽  
Noise Test ◽  
Moderate Hearing Loss

Omnidirectional, supercardioid, and adaptive directional microphones (ADM) were evaluated in combination with the ADRO® amplification scheme for eight participants with moderate sloping hearing losses. The ADM produced better speech perception scores than the other two microphones in all noise conditions. Participants performed the Hearing in Noise Test sentences at -4.5 dB SNR or better, which is similar to the level achievable with normal hearing. The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale indicated no disadvantages of using the ADM relative to the omnidirectional microphone in real-life situations. The ADM was preferred over the omnidirectional microphone in 54% of situations, compared to 17% preferences for the omnidirectional microphone, and 29% no preference. The combination of the ADM to improve SNR, and ADRO® to keep the signal output comfortable and audible provided near-normal hearing performance for people with moderate hearing loss. The ADM is the recommended microphone configuration for ADRO hearing aids.

Regulation of Vocal Intensity in the Presence of Feedback Filtering and Amplification

1981 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 104-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon R. Garber ◽  
Gerald M. Siegel ◽  
Herbert L. Pick
Keyword(s):  
Background Noise ◽  
Self Perception ◽  
Amplification Effect ◽  
Low Pass ◽  
Vocal Intensity ◽  
High Pass

Subjects read while their voices were fed back with 0 and 20 dB of amplification. In Experiment I, feedback was returned unfiltered or low-pass filtered with cut-off frequencies of 1000, 500, and 300 Hz. Subjects decreased vocal intensity with amplified feedback when the feedback was unfiltered or low-pass filtered with cut-off frequencies of 1000 or 500 Hz. The amplification effect disappeared when the cut-off frequency was 300 Hz. In Experiment II, feedback was low-pass filtered and amplified in the presence of a steady background noise. The presence of noise potentiated the amplification effect in the unfiltered condition. When filtering was introduced and/or the cut-off frequency was lowered, the amplification effect decreased. In Experiment III, subjects heard their voices unfiltered and high-pass filtered with cut-off frequencies of 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz. The amplification effect was the same across filtering conditions, It is suggested that subjects respond differently to high- and low-pass filtering because air- and bone-conducted feedback interact differentially in these conditions. It is hypothesized that changes may he mediated by self-perception of loudness or intelligibility.

Use of a Mild-Gain Hearing Aid by Middle-Age Normal-Hearing Adults Who Do and Do Not Self-Report Trouble Hearing in Background Noise

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 419-428
Author(s):  
Jasleen Singh ◽  
Karen A. Doherty
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Aids ◽  
Background Noise ◽  
Middle Age ◽  
Hearing Aid ◽  
Normal Hearing ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Hearing Aid Use ◽  
Hearing Handicap ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Hearing Problems

Purpose The aim of the study was to assess how the use of a mild-gain hearing aid can affect hearing handicap, motivation, and attitudes toward hearing aids for middle-age, normal-hearing adults who do and do not self-report trouble hearing in background noise. Method A total of 20 participants (45–60 years of age) with clinically normal-hearing thresholds (< 25 dB HL) were enrolled in this study. Ten self-reported difficulty hearing in background noise, and 10 did not self-report difficulty hearing in background noise. All participants were fit with mild-gain hearing aids, bilaterally, and were asked to wear them for 2 weeks. Hearing handicap, attitudes toward hearing aids and hearing loss, and motivation to address hearing problems were evaluated before and after participants wore the hearing aids. Participants were also asked if they would consider purchasing a hearing aid before and after 2 weeks of hearing aid use. Results After wearing the hearing aids for 2 weeks, hearing handicap scores decreased for the participants who self-reported difficulty hearing in background noise. No changes in hearing handicap scores were observed for the participants who did not self-report trouble hearing in background noise. The participants who self-reported difficulty hearing in background noise also reported greater personal distress from their hearing problems, were more motivated to address their hearing problems, and had higher levels of hearing handicap compared to the participants who did not self-report trouble hearing in background noise. Only 20% (2/10) of the participants who self-reported trouble hearing in background noise reported that they would consider purchasing a hearing aid after 2 weeks of hearing aid use. Conclusions The use of mild-gain hearing aids has the potential to reduce hearing handicap for normal-hearing, middle-age adults who self-report difficulty hearing in background noise. However, this may not be the most appropriate treatment option for their current hearing problems given that only 20% of these participants would consider purchasing a hearing aid after wearing hearing aids for 2 weeks.

A revised speech intelligibility rating (RSIR) test: Listeners with normal hearing

1994 ◽  
Vol 110 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
C SPEAKS ◽  
T TRINE ◽  
T CRAIN ◽  
N NICCUM
Keyword(s):  
Speech Intelligibility ◽  
Normal Hearing

Effects of Various Background Noises on Speech Intelligibility of Normal Hearing Subjects

2009 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seong Hee Lee ◽  
Hyun Joon Shim ◽  
Sang Won Yoon ◽  
Kyoung Won Lee
Keyword(s):  
Speech Intelligibility ◽  
Normal Hearing

COMPOUND FAULT DIAGNOSIS OF BEARINGS USING AN IMPROVED SPECTRAL KURTOSIS BY MAXIMUM CORRELATION KURTOSIS DECONVOLUTION (MCKD).

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 66-72
Keyword(s):  
Fault Diagnosis ◽  
Resonance Frequency ◽  
Background Noise ◽  
Maximum Correlation ◽  
Vibration Signals ◽  
Filter Length ◽  
Frequency Bands ◽  
Noise Interference ◽  
Spectral Kurtosis

This paper discusses the use of Maximum Correlation kurtosis deconvolution (MCKD) method as a pre-processor in fast spectral kurtosis (FSK) method in order to find the compound fault characteristics of the bearing, by enhancing the vibration signals. FSK only extracts the resonance bands which have maximum kurtosis value, but sometimes it might possible that faults occur in the resonance bands which has low kurtosis value, also the faulty signals missed due to noise interference. In order to overcome these limitations FSK used with MCKD, MCKD extracts various faults present in different resonance frequency bands; also detect the weak impact component, as MCKD also dealt with strong background noise. By obtaining the MCKD parameters like, filter length & deconvolution period, we can extract the compound fault feature characteristics.

scholarly journals Logatome Discrimination in Cochlear Implant Users: Subjective Tests Compared to the Mismatch Negativity

2010 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 329-339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Torsten Rahne ◽  
Michael Ziese ◽  
Dorothea Rostalski ◽  
Roland Mühler
Keyword(s):  
Speech Perception ◽  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Mismatch Negativity ◽  
Speech Intelligibility ◽  
Event Related Potentials ◽  
Normal Hearing ◽  
Discrimination Test ◽  
Speech Database ◽  
Automated Speech Recognition ◽  
Related Potentials

This paper describes a logatome discrimination test for the assessment of speech perception in cochlear implant users (CI users), based on a multilingual speech database, the Oldenburg Logatome Corpus, which was originally recorded for the comparison of human and automated speech recognition. The logatome discrimination task is based on the presentation of 100 logatome pairs (i.e., nonsense syllables) with balanced representations of alternating “vowel-replacement” and “consonant-replacement” paradigms in order to assess phoneme confusions. Thirteen adult normal hearing listeners and eight adult CI users, including both good and poor performers, were included in the study and completed the test after their speech intelligibility abilities were evaluated with an established sentence test in noise. Furthermore, the discrimination abilities were measured electrophysiologically by recording the mismatch negativity (MMN) as a component of auditory event-related potentials. The results show a clear MMN response only for normal hearing listeners and CI users with good performance, correlating with their logatome discrimination abilities. Higher discrimination scores for vowel-replacement paradigms than for the consonant-replacement paradigms were found. We conclude that the logatome discrimination test is well suited to monitor the speech perception skills of CI users. Due to the large number of available spoken logatome items, the Oldenburg Logatome Corpus appears to provide a useful and powerful basis for further development of speech perception tests for CI users.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document