Pursuit Auditory Tracking of Dichotically Presented Tonal Amplitudes

1975 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 74-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harvey M. Sussman ◽  
Peter F. MacNeilage ◽  
Jack L. Lumbley

In pursuit auditory tracking tasks subjects match a continuously varying pure tone presented to one ear with a second tone presented to the other ear and controlled by unidimensional movements of part of their motor system. In previous studies in which tonal frequency was varied, performance was significantly better when the tone controlled by a speech articulator (tongue, jaw) was presented to the right ear, rather than the left, but not if the tone was hand controlled. In this study tonal amplitude was varied in mandibular and manual tracking by 30 normal right-handed subjects. Small right-ear advantage was found for both tracking modes although it did not reach statistical significance. Frequency modulated stimuli may more effectively differentiate speech from nonspeech tracking because we may, as a result of speech experience, possess a more developed lateralized auditory-sensorimotor algorithm for frequency-motor relationships involving the mandible than for amplitude-motor relationships. Testable consequences of this hypothesis are outlined.

2008 ◽  
Vol 431 (1) ◽  
pp. 90-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth Hugdahl ◽  
René Westerhausen ◽  
Kimmo Alho ◽  
Svyatoslav Medvedev ◽  
Heikki Hämäläinen

1993 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 221-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Veena Shukla ◽  
Prakash B. Behere ◽  
Manas K. Mandal

1979 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 391-399 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evelyn Lee Teng

56 right-handed adults (23 men, 33 women) with IQs ranging from 79 to 140 on the Quick Test each performed on two dichotic tests, one with digital input, one with tonal input. The average magnitude of the right-ear advantage for digits was comparable to that of the left-ear advantage for tones, but there was greater between-subject variability with tonal input than with digital input. Ear advantage with digits was unrelated with ear advantage with tones, and high intelligence was not associated with clearly opposite directions of ear advantage for the two types of test material. The results were discussed in terms of hemispheric specializations, as well as the reliability and validity of the dichotic ear effects.


1986 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rauna K. Surr ◽  
Allen A. Montgomery ◽  
H. Gustav Mueller

It is well documented that the majority of individuals with normal hearing have a right ear advantage for dichotic speech material. There is evidence, however, that individuals with flat sensorineural hearing loss demonstrate a left ear advantage after they have used amplification on the left side. The present study examined whether these findings could be extended to a population with high-frequency hearing impairment. The subjects were administered dichotic consonant-vowel syllable tests prior to a monaural hearing aid fitting, and the tests were repeated after 1 month and again after 6 months of hearing aid use. The results revealed a group right ear advantage prior to the hearing aid fitting, although there was considerable individual variability. No consistent changes in the test scores were shown to be associated with monaural hearing aid use in either the right ear or the left ear.


1973 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 368-369 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grace Yeni‐Komshian ◽  
Joel Gordon ◽  
Paul Sherman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document