Speech-Language Pathology Students' Awareness of Language Differences Versus Language Disorders

2013 ◽  
Vol 40 (Spring) ◽  
pp. 8-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra Levey ◽  
Jennifer Sola
Keyword(s):  
Language Disorders ◽  
Speech Language Pathology ◽  
Language Differences ◽  
Language Pathology

scholarly journals The Time Has Come for Speech-Language Pathology License Portability!

2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 27-30
Author(s):  
Melissa Jakubowitz
Keyword(s):  
Public Schools ◽  
Private Practice ◽  
Language Disorders ◽  
Vice President ◽  
Speech Language Pathology ◽  
Past President ◽  
The Public ◽  
Speech Language Pathologist ◽  
Language Pathology ◽  
Managerial Experience

This Letter to the Editor on the topic of speech-language pathology license portability for telepractice, was authored by Melissa Jakubowitz M.A. CCC-SLP, Vice President of SLP Services at PresenceLearning. A speech-language pathologist with over 20 years of clinical and managerial experience, Ms. Jakubowitz is a Board Recognized Specialist in Child Language. Ms. Jakubowitz began her career working in the public schools and has also operated a successful, multi-office private practice.  She is a past Director of the Scottish Rite Institute for Childhood Language Disorders in Stockton, CA. Jakubowitz is also a past-president of the California Speech-Language-Hearing Association, which, with over 5,000 SLP members, is one of the largest speech-language pathologist state associations in the country. Active in the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA), Ms. Jakubowitz served as a Legislative Counselor for 12 years.

scholarly journals Knowledge and Attitudes of Jordanian Dentists toward Speech Language Pathology

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 1298
Author(s):  
Hana Nawaf Mahmoud ◽  
Abdelhameed N. Mahmoud
Keyword(s):  
Language Development ◽  
Language Disorders ◽  
Health Profession ◽  
Speech Language Pathology ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Knowledge And Attitudes ◽  
Speech Language Pathologist ◽  
Language Pathology ◽  
Insufficient Knowledge ◽  
Normal Speech

This study was conducted to assess dentists’ knowledge of normal speech-language development (NSLD), speech-language disorders (SLD), and speech-language pathology (SLPy) and to determine their general attitudes toward speech-language pathology (SLPy). A self-administered, web-based questionnaire was emailed to all members of the Jordanian Dental Association Council. 191 completed questionnaire were entered in excel sheet and statistically analyzed with IBM SPSS version 20 software. The respondents demonstrated insufficient knowledge regarding normal speech-language development and speech-language disorders. Additionally, the major¬ity of respondents reported a general impression that the speech-language pathologist has an important role in a health profession team (86.8%). However, they did poorly on the normal speech-language development questions (26%) as well as the speech-language disorders questions (18%). There were no statistically significant differences between different variables - age, gender, years of practice, place of practice and specialty of dentists and dentists’ knowledge of speech-language pathology.

scholarly journals Comorbidity of stuttering disordered phonology in young children

1990 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lesley Wolk ◽  
Edward G. Conture ◽  
Mary L. Edwards
Keyword(s):  
Young Children ◽  
Special Reference ◽  
Language Disorders ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Speech Language Pathology ◽  
Speech And Language ◽  
Phonological Disorders ◽  
Language Pathology ◽  
Prognostic Implications ◽  
Speech And Language Disorders

Young stutterers frequently exhibit concomitant speech and/or language disorders. The co-occurrence of these disorders is, however, not yet well understood. The purpose of this paper is to introduce the notion of "comorbidity" as it relates to the field of speech-language pathology specifically, to discuss comorbidity (coexistence) of stuttering and disordered phonology in young children. Literature on concomitant speech and language disorders in young stutterers is reviewed, with special reference to the prevalence of articulatory/phonological disorders in young stutterers. Future research on the coexistence of two speech and language disorders is encouraged, as well as the consideration of diagnostic treatment and prognostic implications for children who, exhibit both stuttering and disordered phonology as opposed to children who exhibit each disorder in isolation.

scholarly journals Organization of the referral and counter-referral system in a speech-language pathology and audiology clinic-school

CoDAS ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 273-278 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela Regina Molini-Avejonas ◽  
Stephanie Falarara Estevam ◽  
Maria Inês Vieira Couto
Keyword(s):  
Prospective Study ◽  
Public Services ◽  
Speech Therapy ◽  
Language Disorders ◽  
Referral System ◽  
Patient Records ◽  
Speech Language Pathology ◽  
Demographic Information ◽  
Language Pathology ◽  
Male Subjects

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effectiveness of the referral and counter-referral flow in a speech-language pathology and audiology clinic-school and to characterize the patients' profiles. METHODS: Evaluation, retrospective, and prospective study, in which 503 patient records, without age restriction, were selected from a clinic-school and the following variables were analyzed: demographic information, speech and hearing diagnosis, and references. Patients were distributed into two groups according to the referrals made: internal (G1, n=341) and external (G2, n=162) to the clinic-school. RESULTS: A prevalence of male subjects under 12 years of age and with diagnosis of language disorders (primary and secondary) was found. It was observed that 83% patients in G1 were recalled for evaluation and speech therapy after an average of 7 months of waiting; and from the patients in G2 that were contacted (n=101), 13.9% were summoned and are satisfied with the place indicated for therapy after an average of 4 months of waiting. From those who did not receive care, 46% sought another service, and of these, 72.5% were successful. CONCLUSION: The data show the effectiveness and appropriateness of referrals made internally, suggesting that, when the team works together, the network operates more adequately. However, in relation to external referrals, they did not reach the proposed goals, indicating a lack of speech-language pathologists in public services and the low interest of patients in looking for other places of care.

scholarly journals “Tell Me About Your Child”: A Grounded Theory Study of Mothers' Understanding of Language Disorder

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 819-840 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea C. Ash ◽  
Tyler T. Christopulos ◽  
Sean M. Redmond
Keyword(s):  
Grounded Theory ◽  
Language Disorder ◽  
Language Disorders ◽  
Speech Language Pathology ◽  
Speech Language Pathologists ◽  
Speech Language Pathologist ◽  
Lack Of Information ◽  
Diagnostic Labels ◽  
Psychological Harm ◽  
Language Pathology

Purpose The purpose of this study was to generate a theory grounded in data explaining caregivers' understanding of their child's language disorder and the perceived role of speech-language pathologists in facilitating this knowledge. Method This study employed grounded theory as a conceptual framework. Qualitative data were generated based on semistructured interviews conducted with 12 mothers of children who had received speech-language pathology services. Results The following themes emerged from the data analysis: (a) Many mothers reported receiving confusing or irrelevant diagnostic terms for language disorder, (b) mothers of children with language disorders were distressed about their children's language problems, (c) mothers did not always trust or understand their children's speech-language pathologist, and (d) mothers were satisfied with the interventions their child had been receiving. Mothers described their children's language disorder using a total of 23 labels, most of which were not useful for accessing meaningful information about the nature of their child's communication problem. Generally, mothers reported they did not receive language-related diagnostic labels from speech-language pathologists for their child's language disorder. Conclusions Two theories were generated from the results: (a) Lack of information provided to mothers about their child's language disorder causes mothers psychological harm that appears to be long lasting. (b) Difficulties in successfully relaying information about language disorders to parents result in negative perceptions of speech-language pathology. Implications and future directions are discussed. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.12177390

Current Issues: Camp JumpStart: Clinical Training in Prevention

2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 87-92
Author(s):  
Peggy C. Agee
Keyword(s):  
Emergent Literacy ◽  
Clinical Training ◽  
Language Disorders ◽  
Written Language ◽  
Speech Language Pathology ◽  
Knowledge And Skills ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Assessment And Treatment ◽  
Language Pathology ◽  
Training Opportunities

The American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) has expanded the scope of practice in speech-language pathology to include a focus on prevention (2007). Similarly, the knowledge and skills required of speech-language pathologists have broadened to include the prevention, assessment, and treatment of written language disorders. University training programs have a responsibility to provide graduate student clinicians with a wide range of clinical training opportunities that prepare them to enter the profession of speech-language pathology with the requisite knowledge and skills. Therefore, university programs must be creative in designing training opportunities that fulfill this mandate. This article explores one clinical training approach for the prevention of written language disorders through a systematic focus on emergent literacy.

Speech-Language Pathology Services in the Schools: A Follow-Up 9 Years Later

2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 1037-1048
Author(s):  
Jayne Brandel
Keyword(s):  
Service Delivery ◽  
National Survey ◽  
Language Disorders ◽  
Speech Language Pathology ◽  
Services Research ◽  
School Practice ◽  
Language Pathology ◽  
Severity Levels ◽  
The Individual

Purpose Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) in the schools provide services to students with a variety of disorders and severity levels. This study built upon a previously published survey (Brandel & Loeb, 2011) to examine whether factors related to the place and time for services for students with language disorders had changed since the 2008 survey and to examine the differentiation of decisions made by the SLPs across the three severity levels. Method Responses from 439 SLPs to an online national survey related to the place and time of services for students with language disorders were examined using regression in regard to the current factors impacting service delivery and the amount of variation in these decisions by the individual SLPs across the three severity levels. Results Similar to previous findings, students participated in services primarily in groups outside the classroom once or twice a week for 20–30 min. Factors that continued to impact decisions were the SLP's caseload and year of graduation. Related to the differentiation of decisions, most SLPs made two different decisions across the three severity levels for where and how long to provide services, while almost one third made the same decision for the place. Conclusions The results indicate that service delivery and the factors impacting it have remained relatively the same. While most SLPs do differentiate decisions related to time, less variation is observed regarding the place for services. Research is needed to clearly identify barriers and test possible solutions so that school practice can improve.

Clinical Linguistics

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise Cummings
Keyword(s):  
Specific Language Impairment ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Language Disorder ◽  
Full Range ◽  
Language Disorders ◽  
Communication Disorders ◽  
Classification Systems ◽  
Speech Language Pathology ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Language Pathology

Clinical linguistics is the branch of linguistics that applies linguistic concepts and theories to the study of language disorders. As the name suggests, clinical linguistics is a dual-facing discipline. Although the conceptual roots of this field are in linguistics, its domain of application is the vast array of clinical disorders that may compromise the use and understanding of language. Both dimensions of clinical linguistics can be addressed through an examination of specific linguistic deficits in individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders, craniofacial anomalies, adult-onset neurological impairments, psychiatric disorders, and neurodegenerative disorders. Clinical linguists are interested in the full range of linguistic deficits in these conditions, including phonetic deficits of children with cleft lip and palate, morphosyntactic errors in children with specific language impairment, and pragmatic language impairments in adults with schizophrenia. Like many applied disciplines in linguistics, clinical linguistics sits at the intersection of a number of areas. The relationship of clinical linguistics to the study of communication disorders and to speech-language pathology (speech and language therapy in the United Kingdom) are two particularly important points of intersection. Speech-language pathology is the area of clinical practice that assesses and treats children and adults with communication disorders. All language disorders restrict an individual’s ability to communicate freely with others in a range of contexts and settings. So language disorders are first and foremost communication disorders. To understand language disorders, it is useful to think of them in terms of points of breakdown on a communication cycle that tracks the progress of a linguistic utterance from its conception in the mind of a speaker to its comprehension by a hearer. This cycle permits the introduction of a number of important distinctions in language pathology, such as the distinction between a receptive and an expressive language disorder, and between a developmental and an acquired language disorder. The cycle is also a useful model with which to conceptualize a range of communication disorders other than language disorders. These other disorders, which include hearing, voice, and fluency disorders, are also relevant to clinical linguistics. Clinical linguistics draws on the conceptual resources of the full range of linguistic disciplines to describe and explain language disorders. These disciplines include phonetics, phonology, morphology, syntax, semantics, pragmatics, and discourse. Each of these linguistic disciplines contributes concepts and theories that can shed light on the nature of language disorder. A wide range of tools and approaches are used by clinical linguists and speech-language pathologists to assess, diagnose, and treat language disorders. They include the use of standardized and norm-referenced tests, communication checklists and profiles (some administered by clinicians, others by parents, teachers, and caregivers), and qualitative methods such as conversation analysis and discourse analysis. Finally, clinical linguists can contribute to debates about the nosology of language disorders. In order to do so, however, they must have an understanding of the place of language disorders in internationally recognized classification systems such as the 2013 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) of the American Psychiatric Association.

Culture of collaboration

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-25
Author(s):  
Jennifer Whited ◽  
Jack S. Damico
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Language Disorders ◽  
Therapeutic Strategies ◽  
Speech Language Pathology ◽  
Motivation To Read ◽  
Learning Impairments ◽  
Motivated Behavior ◽  
Key Characteristics ◽  
Language Pathology ◽  
Therapy Sessions

Purpose: The purpose of this article is to report the results from a research project which focused on understanding how motivation to read is manifested and maintained in children with learning impairments. The participants were enrolled in a specialized university literacy program with graduate student clinicians. Method: An interpretative, qualitative study utilizing components of ethnography and microanalysis was employed to analyze video transcripts of recorded therapy sessions of speech-language pathology student clinicians and children with language disorders. These interactions were coded for the nature of their role in motivating children to read. Results and conclusions: This study revealed that a culture of collaboration was a hallmark of treatment that facilitated motivation in the participants. Two key characteristics of motivated behavior that emerged as a result of this culture of collaboration are identified and described. Additionally, three specific, collaborative, therapeutic strategies found to sustain motivation to read are described.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document