The Future of the Android Operating System for Augmentative and Alternative Communication

2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 52-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeff Higginbotham ◽  
Steve Jacobs
Keyword(s):  
Operating System ◽  
Mobile Communications ◽  
Augmentative And Alternative Communication ◽  
Consumer Electronics ◽  
Alternative Communication ◽  
Consumer Market ◽  
Access Methods ◽  
Software Applications ◽  
Field Transforming ◽  
Standard Software

Abstract We have experienced one of the most remarkable years in augmentative and alternative communication (AAC). The iPad, along with the iPhone, redefined mobile communications and personal computing technology. In the ensuing 9 months after the iPad's release, more than 50 non-iPad tablets have been developed and demonstrated at the 2011 Consumer Electronics Show and are ready for the consumer market. For the AAC consumer, the proliferation of these mainstream technologies will result in increasingly inexpensive hardware and software, availability of alternative access methods, opportunity to use standard software applications, and availability of applications that meet the specific needs of individual consumers. Because the Android platform is still in its infancy—especially with respect to AAC—we will focus on the potential effects this operating system could have on AAC. We will describe Android, its current offerings, and future possibilities. The emergence of iOS and Android has disrupted the AAC field, transforming the ways that we look at, purchase, and use technology.

New AAC Access Strategy for Gesture Tracking: A Technical Note

2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Fager ◽  
Tom Jakobs ◽  
David Beukelman ◽  
Tricia Ternus ◽  
Haylee Schley
Keyword(s):  
Augmentative And Alternative Communication ◽  
Technical Note ◽  
Head Tracking ◽  
Alternative Communication ◽  
Access Methods ◽  
Cord Injury ◽  
Physical Limitations ◽  
Gesture Tracking ◽  
Communication Needs ◽  
Tracking Device

Abstract This article summarizes the design and evaluation of a new augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) interface strategy for people with complex communication needs and severe physical limitations. This strategy combines typing, gesture recognition, and word prediction to input text into AAC software using touchscreen or head movement tracking access methods. Eight individuals with movement limitations due to spinal cord injury, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, polio, and Guillain Barre syndrome participated in the evaluation of the prototype technology using a head-tracking device. Fourteen typical individuals participated in the evaluation of the prototype using a touchscreen.

The Evolution of Augmentative Communication and the Importance of Alternate Access

2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Chapple
Keyword(s):  
Augmentative And Alternative Communication ◽  
Cell Phone ◽  
Handheld Devices ◽  
Alternative Communication ◽  
Access Methods ◽  
The Past ◽  
Communication Device ◽  
Internet Browser ◽  
A Cell ◽  
Development Of Language

Abstract Over the past 20 years, there have been many advances in the computer industry as well as in augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) devices. Computers are becoming more compact and have multiple purposes, such as the iPhone, which is a cell phone, mp3 player, and an Internet browser. AAC devices also have evolved to become multi-purpose devices; the most sophisticated devices have functionality similar to the iPhone and iPod. Recently, the idea of having the iPhone and iPad as a communication device was initiated with the development of language applications specifically for this format. It might be true that this idea could become the future of AAC devices; however, there are major access issues to overcome before the idea is a reality. This article will chronicle advancements in AAC devices, specifically on access methods, throughout the years, towards the transition to handheld devices. The newest technologies hold much promise with both features and affordability factors being highly attractive. Yet, these technologies must be made to incorporate alternate access if they are to meet their fullest potential as AAC tools.

The Three Definitions of Application for AAC Intervention

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (12) ◽  
pp. 99-107
Author(s):  
Samuel C. Sennott ◽  
Reny Ferrari ◽  
Gayle McLernon ◽  
Deborah Lesher
Keyword(s):  
Mobile Devices ◽  
Augmentative And Alternative Communication ◽  
Major Change ◽  
Good Teaching ◽  
Alternative Communication ◽  
Software Application ◽  
Software Applications ◽  
Coverage Decision ◽  
Sustained Effort ◽  
Definition Of

This article will address an important issue related to speech-generating devices (SGDs) and augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) software applications (apps) in relation to the widespread adoption of mobile devices. This article will explore each of the three definitions of application including (a) a software application, (b) putting something into practice or operation, and (c) sustained effort. We hope that these three “app” definitions and discussion of our use of the Student, Environments, Tasks, and Tools (SETT) Framework can be a quick, easy, and memorable way to convey to families, therapists, and teachers that tools are made powerful when they are combined with good teaching and processes that sustain the use of AAC. A review of The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services updated 2015 National Coverage Decision for SGDs will be included, highlighting the major change to this updated coverage which includes the expansion of the definition of speech.

When You Can't Touch a Touch Screen

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (04) ◽  
pp. 286-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamie Boster ◽  
John McCarthy
Keyword(s):  
Augmentative And Alternative Communication ◽  
Communication Systems ◽  
Touch Screen ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Alternative Communication ◽  
Access Methods ◽  
Apple Ipad ◽  
Multiple Devices ◽  
Future Research Directions ◽  
Intuitive Interface

AbstractA touch screen can be an intuitive interface method for many people. Mobile phones, tablets, and tablet computer combinations have made this technology part of daily use. Touchscreen technologies are common and present unique difficulties for individuals who require alternative access methods. Dedicated augmentative and alternative communication systems continue to offer a range of access methods, but it is also important to examine existing accessibility options from mainstream companies (e.g., Microsoft [Redmond, WA], Apple [Cupertino, CA]) and how current tools can be used to allow individuals to interact with touch screen technologies. An overview of current accessibility features available on popular mainstream devices (e.g., Microsoft Surface, Apple iPad) is provided along with discussion of alternative access methods for current technologies, future research directions, and the potential impact of speech recognition, virtual reality, and augmented reality for interfacing with multiple devices.

iPods and iPads as AAC Devices for Children with Developmental Disorders

2015 ◽  
pp. 1-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larah van der Meer
Keyword(s):  
Instructional Strategies ◽  
Augmentative And Alternative Communication ◽  
Developmental Disorders ◽  
New Technology ◽  
Language Assessment ◽  
Alternative Communication ◽  
Ipod Touch ◽  
Individual Level ◽  
Software Applications ◽  
The Individual

The Apple iPod Touch™ and iPad™ are increasingly used as augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) devices. This chapter discusses the use of iPods™/iPads™ loaded with software applications that enable speech output and thereby transform them into speech-generating devices (SGD). While a popular mode of communication for children with developmental disorders (DD) who have little or no spoken language, assessment of the effectiveness of such new technology to enhance communicative functioning is necessary. Research on the use of iPods™/iPads™ was evaluated to assess whether they are (a) effective as AAC devices, (b) at least as effective as other AAC interventions, and (c) effective at the individual level of implementation. Findings suggested that the use of iPods™/iPads™ as AAC devices is promising, also in comparison to other AAC systems. Children typically preferred using iPods™/iPads™. Selection of an AAC system based on the child's preference coupled with appropriate instructional strategies may lead to the enhancement of communicative functioning for children with DD.

iPods and iPads as AAC Devices for Children with Developmental Disorders

2016 ◽  
pp. 846-872
Author(s):  
Larah van der Meer
Keyword(s):  
Instructional Strategies ◽  
Augmentative And Alternative Communication ◽  
Developmental Disorders ◽  
New Technology ◽  
Language Assessment ◽  
Alternative Communication ◽  
Ipod Touch ◽  
Individual Level ◽  
Software Applications ◽  
The Individual

The Apple iPod Touch™ and iPad™ are increasingly used as augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) devices. This chapter discusses the use of iPods™/iPads™ loaded with software applications that enable speech output and thereby transform them into speech-generating devices (SGD). While a popular mode of communication for children with developmental disorders (DD) who have little or no spoken language, assessment of the effectiveness of such new technology to enhance communicative functioning is necessary. Research on the use of iPods™/iPads™ was evaluated to assess whether they are (a) effective as AAC devices, (b) at least as effective as other AAC interventions, and (c) effective at the individual level of implementation. Findings suggested that the use of iPods™/iPads™ as AAC devices is promising, also in comparison to other AAC systems. Children typically preferred using iPods™/iPads™. Selection of an AAC system based on the child's preference coupled with appropriate instructional strategies may lead to the enhancement of communicative functioning for children with DD.

scholarly journals Brain–Computer Interfaces for Augmentative and Alternative Communication: A Tutorial

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan S. Brumberg ◽  
Kevin M. Pitt ◽  
Alana Mantie-Kozlowski ◽  
Jeremy D. Burnison
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Application ◽  
Augmentative And Alternative Communication ◽  
Scope Of Practice ◽  
Brain Computer Interfaces ◽  
Alternative Communication ◽  
Access Methods ◽  
Computer Interfaces ◽  
Current State ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
Areas Of Interest

Purpose Brain–computer interfaces (BCIs) have the potential to improve communication for people who require but are unable to use traditional augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) devices. As BCIs move toward clinical practice, speech-language pathologists (SLPs) will need to consider their appropriateness for AAC intervention. Method This tutorial provides a background on BCI approaches to provide AAC specialists foundational knowledge necessary for clinical application of BCI. Tutorial descriptions were generated based on a literature review of BCIs for restoring communication. Results The tutorial responses directly address 4 major areas of interest for SLPs who specialize in AAC: (a) the current state of BCI with emphasis on SLP scope of practice (including the subareas: the way in which individuals access AAC with BCI, the efficacy of BCI for AAC, and the effects of fatigue), (b) populations for whom BCI is best suited, (c) the future of BCI as an addition to AAC access strategies, and (d) limitations of BCI. Conclusion Current BCIs have been designed as access methods for AAC rather than a replacement; therefore, SLPs can use existing knowledge in AAC as a starting point for clinical application. Additional training is recommended to stay updated with rapid advances in BCI.

scholarly journals Guidelines for Feature Matching Assessment of Brain–Computer Interfaces for Augmentative and Alternative Communication

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 950-964 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin M. Pitt ◽  
Jonathan S. Brumberg
Keyword(s):  
Motor Imagery ◽  
Augmentative And Alternative Communication ◽  
Feature Matching ◽  
Full Range ◽  
Brain Computer Interfaces ◽  
Alternative Communication ◽  
Access Methods ◽  
Computer Interfaces ◽  
Sensory Motor ◽  
Selection Of

Purpose Brain–computer interfaces (BCIs) can provide access to augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) devices using neurological activity alone without voluntary movements. As with traditional AAC access methods, BCI performance may be influenced by the cognitive–sensory–motor and motor imagery profiles of those who use these devices. Therefore, we propose a person-centered, feature matching framework consistent with clinical AAC best practices to ensure selection of the most appropriate BCI technology to meet individuals' communication needs. Method The proposed feature matching procedure is based on the current state of the art in BCI technology and published reports on cognitive, sensory, motor, and motor imagery factors important for successful operation of BCI devices. Results Considerations for successful selection of BCI for accessing AAC are summarized based on interpretation from a multidisciplinary team with experience in AAC, BCI, neuromotor disorders, and cognitive assessment. The set of features that support each BCI option are discussed in a hypothetical case format to model possible transition of BCI research from the laboratory into clinical AAC applications. Conclusions This procedure is an initial step toward consideration of feature matching assessment for the full range of BCI devices. Future investigations are needed to fully examine how person-centered factors influence BCI performance across devices.

scholarly journals Rare neurological diseases in children: current paradigm of communicational interventions and inclusion

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-26
Author(s):  
Armenuhi Avagyan ◽  
Hasmik Mkrtchyan ◽  
Tigran Petrosyan
Keyword(s):  
Neurological Disorders ◽  
Augmentative And Alternative Communication ◽  
Neurological Diseases ◽  
Communication Technologies ◽  
Alternative Communication ◽  
Language Therapy ◽  
Access Methods ◽  
Psychological Disturbances ◽  
Communication Difficulties ◽  
Communication Needs

The goal of the presented work is to identify the optimum strategy for the enhancement of communication in patients with rare neurological disorders based on different models. With rapidly developing alternative communication technologies it becomes essential to identify an access method for a child and chose the alternative system of communication. Communication difficulties are common in children with rare neurological disorders. These disorders are manifested with motor, cognitive and sensory deficit. Speech and language therapy applied in these categories of patients is presented in various research publications. When forming a message, human communicators typically use a combination of modes: cognitive, psychological, or psycholinguistic sense to facilitate the way children construct internal representations that can be encoded and presented in different forms. Comprehensive assessment and recommendation of appropriate augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) systems are critical factors in the success of interventions for individuals with rare neurological disorders who have complex communication needs. The assessment of communication difficulties associated with rare diseases is an essential factor for the development of AAC technologies for these pediatric patients. The methods applied in the presented research are: analysis of different studies and, systematization and generalization of the research evidence. Enhancement of communication in patients with rare neurological disorders should be based on the integration of cognitive, psychological, or psycholinguistic models. For children with rare neurological disorders that eventually lead to speech, cognitive and psychological disturbances, AAC methods are the strategies of choice to facilitate communication. These tools with different access methods are used to support inclusion of children with rare neurological conditions into education system.

The Effect of Symbol Background Color on the Speed of Locating Targets by Adults Without Disabilities: Implications for Augmentative and Alternative Communication Display Design

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 1482-1488
Author(s):  
Jennifer J. Thistle
Keyword(s):  
Augmentative And Alternative Communication ◽  
Reaction Times ◽  
The Other ◽  
Background Color ◽  
Alternative Communication ◽  
Display Design ◽  
Line Drawings ◽  
Research With Children ◽  
Study Participants ◽  
Perceptual Factors

Purpose Previous research with children with and without disabilities has demonstrated that visual–perceptual factors can influence the speech of locating a target on an array. Adults without disabilities often facilitate the learning and use of a child's augmentative and alternative communication system. The current research examined how the presence of symbol background color influenced the speed with which adults without disabilities located target line drawings in 2 studies. Method Both studies used a between-subjects design. In the 1st study, 30 adults (ages 18–29 years) located targets in a 16-symbol array. In the 2nd study, 30 adults (ages 18–34 years) located targets in a 60-symbol array. There were 3 conditions in each study: symbol background color, symbol background white with a black border, and symbol background white with a color border. Results In the 1st study, reaction times across groups were not significantly different. In the 2nd study, participants in the symbol background color condition were significantly faster than participants in the other conditions, and participants in the symbol background white with black border were significantly slower than participants in the other conditions. Conclusion Communication partners may benefit from the presence of background color, especially when supporting children using displays with many symbols.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document