The innate immune system in human systemic lupus erythematosus

2017 ◽  
Vol 131 (8) ◽  
pp. 625-634 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Weidenbusch ◽  
Onkar P. Kulkarni ◽  
Hans-Joachim Anders

Although the role of adaptive immune mechanisms, e.g. autoantibody formation and abnormal T-cell activation, has been long noted in the pathogenesis of human systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), the role of innate immunity has been less well characterized. An intricate interplay between both innate and adaptive immune elements exists in protective anti-infective immunity as well as in detrimental autoimmunity. More recently, it has become clear that the innate immune system in this regard not only starts inflammation cascades in SLE leading to disease flares, but also continues to fuel adaptive immune responses throughout the course of the disease. This is why targeting the innate immune system offers an additional means of treating SLE. First trials assessing the efficacy of anti-type I interferon (IFN) therapy or modulators of pattern recognition receptor (PRR) signalling have been attempted. In this review, we summarize the available evidence on the role of several distinct innate immune elements, especially neutrophils and dendritic cells as well as the IFN system, as well as specific innate PRRs along with their signalling pathways. Finally, we highlight recent clinical trials in SLE addressing one or more of the aforementioned components of the innate immune system.

Author(s):  
Peter Lloyd ◽  
Sarah Doaty ◽  
Bevra H. Hahn

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease characterized by the presence of immune dysregulation, autoreactive B and T cells, and the production of a broad, heterogeneous group of autoantibodies (autoAb). The pathogenesis of lupus can be divided into three stages: 1) genetic predisposition and environmental exposures, 2) loss of tolerance, and 3) immune activation. In this chapter we will discuss the aetiopathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus with emphasis placed on key autoantibodies, cytokines, the innate and adaptive immune system, tolerance, NETosis, genetics and epigenetics, environmental triggers and the role of gender.


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 205031211987614 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Angélica Pabón-Porras ◽  
Sebastian Molina-Ríos ◽  
Jorge Bruce Flórez-Suárez ◽  
Paola Ximena Coral-Alvarado ◽  
Paul Méndez-Patarroyo ◽  
...  

Rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus are two highly prevalent autoimmune diseases that generate disability and low quality of life. The innate immune system, a long-forgotten issue in autoimmune diseases, is becoming increasingly important and represents a new focus for the treatment of these entities. This review highlights the role that innate immune system plays in the pathophysiology of rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus. The role of the innate immune system in rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus pathophysiology is not only important in early stages but is essential to maintain the immune response and to allow disease progression. In rheumatoid arthritis, genetic and environmental factors are involved in the initial stimulation of the innate immune response in which macrophages are the main participants, as well as fibroblast-like synoviocytes. In systemic lupus erythematosus, all the cells contribute to the inflammatory response, but the complement system is the major effector of the inflammatory process. Detecting alterations in the normal function of these cells, besides its contribution to the understanding of the pathophysiology of autoimmune diseases, could help to establish new treatment strategies for these diseases.


Author(s):  
Rodolfo Perez-Alamino ◽  
Raquel Cuchacovich ◽  
Luis R. Espinoza ◽  
Constance P. Porretta ◽  
Arnold H. Zea

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 369-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary K. Crow ◽  
Mikhail Olferiev ◽  
Kyriakos A. Kirou

Type I interferons, which make up the first cytokine family to be described and are the essential mediators of antivirus host defense, have emerged as central elements in the immunopathology of systemic autoimmune diseases, with systemic lupus erythematosus as the prototype. Lessons from investigation of interferon regulation following virus infection can be applied to lupus, with the conclusion that sustained production of type I interferon shifts nearly all components of the immune system toward pathologic functions that result in tissue damage and disease. We review recent data, mainly from studies of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, that provide new insights into the mechanisms of induction and the immunologic consequences of chronic activation of the type I interferon pathway. Current concepts implicate endogenous nucleic acids, driving both cytosolic sensors and endosomal Toll-like receptors, in interferon pathway activation and suggest targets for development of novel therapeutics that may restore the immune system to health.


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. A. Ibrahim ◽  
A. Y. Afify ◽  
I. O. Fawzy ◽  
N. El-Ekiaby ◽  
A. I. Abdelaziz

Abstract Epigenetic modifications have been well documented in autoimmune diseases. MicroRNAs (miRNAs), in particular, have long intrigued scientists in the field of autoimmunity. Owing to its central role in the development of the immune system, microRNA-155 (miR-155) is deeply involved in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Despite the advancements made in treating SLE, the disease still remains incurable. Therefore, recent attention has been drawn to the manipulation of epigenetics in the development of curative treatments. In fact, it is a widely held view that miRNA-targeted therapy is a new glimmer of hope in the treatment of autoimmune diseases. However, the duplicity of miRNAs should not be overlooked. A single miRNA can target several mRNAs, and some mRNAs may possess opposing functions. In this review, we highlight the role of miR-155 as a biomarker and review its functions in SLE patients and animal models while discussing possible reasons behind inconsistencies across studies.


2006 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 307-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth L Rosenthal

New and exciting insights into the importance of the innate immune system are revolutionizing our understanding of immune defense against infections, pathogenesis, and the treatment and prevention of infectious diseases. The innate immune system uses multiple families of germline-encoded pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) to detect infection and trigger a variety of antimicrobial defense mechanisms. PRRs are evolutionarily highly conserved and serve to detect infection by recognizing pathogen-associated molecular patterns that are unique to microorganisms and essential for their survival. Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are transmembrane signalling receptors that activate gene expression programs that result in the production of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines, type I interferons and antimicrobial factors. Furthermore, TLR activation facilitates and guides activation of adaptive immune responses through the activation of dendritic cells. TLRs are localized on the cell surface and in endosomal/lysosomal compartments, where they detect bacterial and viral infections. In contrast, nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain proteins and RNA helicases are located in the cell cytoplasm, where they serve as intracellular PRRs to detect cytoplasmic infections, particularly viruses. Due to their ability to enhance innate immune responses, novel strategies to use ligands, synthetic agonists or antagonists of PRRs (also known as 'innate immunologicals') can be used as stand-alone agents to provide immediate protection or treatment against bacterial, viral or parasitic infections. Furthermore, the newly appreciated importance of innate immunity in initiating and shaping adaptive immune responses is contributing to our understanding of vaccine adjuvants and promises to lead to improved next-generation vaccines.


Cells ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 963 ◽  
Author(s):  
I-Tsu Chyuan ◽  
Hong-Tai Tzeng ◽  
Ji-Yih Chen

Type I and type III interferons (IFNs) share several properties in common, including the induction of signaling pathways, the activation of gene transcripts, and immune responses, against viral infection. Recent advances in the understanding of the molecular basis of innate and adaptive immunity have led to the re-examination of the role of these IFNs in autoimmune diseases. To date, a variety of IFN-regulated genes, termed IFN signature genes, have been identified. The expressions of these genes significantly increase in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), highlighting the role of type I and type III IFNs in the pathogenesis of SLE. In this review, we first discussed the signaling pathways and the immunoregulatory roles of type I and type III IFNs. Next, we discussed the roles of these IFNs in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases, including SLE. In SLE, IFN-stimulated genes induced by IFN signaling contribute to a positive feedback loop of autoimmunity, resulting in perpetual autoimmune inflammation. Based on this, we discussed the use of several specific IFN blocking strategies using anti-IFN-α antibodies, anti-IFN-α receptor antibodies, and IFN-α-kinoid or downstream small molecules, which intervene in Janus kinase (JAK)-signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathways, in clinical trials for SLE patients. Hopefully, the development of novel regimens targeting IFN signaling pathways will shed light on promising future therapeutic applications for SLE patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 187-191
Author(s):  
Rodolfo Perez-Alamino ◽  
Raquel Cuchacovich ◽  
Luis R. Espinoza ◽  
Constance P. Porretta ◽  
Arnold H. Zea

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 126-128
Author(s):  
A. M. Lila ◽  
S. K. Soloviev ◽  
T. V. Popkova

On April 28, 2021, a meeting of the Council of Experts was held with the participation of the leading experts in the field of rheumatic diseases, approaches to the treatment of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) were discussed. The issues of medical care for patients with SLE and their routing, key points of Russian and international clinical guidelines for the management of patients with SLE, as well as the role of interferon (IFN) type I in the pathogenesis of the disease were discussed. It is noted that the management of patients with SLE requires a multidisciplinary approach. The basis of therapy is the use of glucocorticoids (GC), immunosuppressive drugs and their combinations. But long-term use of GC in patients with SLE leads to severe complications. Early prescription of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) allows to achieve the greatest effect and prevent the development of irreversible organ damage associated with SLE. Currently data from three clinical trials on the efficacy and safety of the type I IFN inhibitor anifrolumab are available. During the discussion, experts defined the clinical profile of a patient with SLE, for whom administration of bDMARD therapy is indicated. According to experts, the use of a type I IFN inhibitor in routine clinical practice can improve disease outcomes in both short and long term.


2010 ◽  
Vol 2010 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isaac T. W. Harley ◽  
Timothy B. Niewold ◽  
Rebecca M. Stormont ◽  
Kenneth M. Kaufman ◽  
Stuart B. Glenn ◽  
...  

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by increased type I interferons (IFNs) and multiorgan inflammation frequently targeting the skin. IFN-kappa is a type I IFN expressed in skin. A pooled genome-wide scan implicated theIFNKlocus in SLE susceptibility. We studiedIFNKsingle nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 3982 SLE cases and 4275 controls, composed of European (EA), African-American (AA), and Asian ancestry. rs12553951C was associated with SLE in EA males (odds ratio=1.93,P=2.5×10−4), but not females. Suggestive associations with skin phenotypes in EA and AA females were found, and these were also sex-specific.IFNKSNPs were associated with increased serum type I IFN in EA and AA SLE patients. Our data suggest a sex-dependent association betweenIFNKSNPs and SLE and skin phenotypes. The serum IFN association suggests thatIFNKvariants could influence type I IFN producing plasmacytoid dendritic cells in affected skin.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document