Failure of propranolol to prevent tilt-evoked systemic vasodilatation, adrenaline release and neurocardiogenic syncope

2006 ◽  
Vol 111 (3) ◽  
pp. 209-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Basil A. Eldadah ◽  
Sandra L. Pechnik ◽  
Courtney S. Holmes ◽  
Jeffrey P. Moak ◽  
Ahmed M. Saleem ◽  
...  

In patients with neurocardiogenic syncope, head-up tilt often evokes acute loss of consciousness accompanied by vasodilatation, increased plasma adrenaline and systemic hypotension. Since hypotension increases adrenaline levels and adrenaline can produce skeletal muscle vasodilatation by activating β2 receptors, adrenaline might induce a positive feedback loop precipitating circulatory collapse. We hypothesized that propranolol, a non-selective β-blocker, would prevent adrenaline-induced vasodilatation and thereby prevent syncope. Eight subjects with recurrent neurocardiogenic syncope and previously documented tilt-induced syncope with elevated plasma adrenaline levels participated in the present study. Subjects underwent tilt table testing after receiving oral propranolol or placebo in a double-blind randomized crossover fashion. Haemodynamic and neurochemical variables were measured using intra-arterial monitoring, impedance cardiography, arterial blood sampling and tracer kinetics of simultaneously infused [3H]noradrenaline and [3H]adrenaline. The occurrence of tilt-induced neurally mediated hypotension and syncope, duration of tilt tolerance, extent of the decrease in SVRI (systemic vascular resistance index) and magnitude of plasma adrenaline increases did not differ between the propranolol and placebo treatment phases. SVRI was inversely associated with fractional increase in plasma adrenaline during both phases. One subject did not faint when on propranolol; this subject's response is discussed in the context of central effects of propranolol. In this small, but tightly controlled, study, propranolol did not prevent tilt-induced vasodilatation, syncope or elevated plasma adrenaline.

Cephalalgia ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (11) ◽  
pp. 959-968 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esma Dilli ◽  
Rashmi Halker ◽  
Bert Vargas ◽  
Joseph Hentz ◽  
Teresa Radam ◽  
...  

Background Occipital nerve (ON) injections with corticosteroids and/or local anesthetics have been employed for the acute and preventive treatment of migraine for decades. However, to date there is no randomized, placebo-controlled evidence to support the use of occipital nerve block (ONB) for the prevention of migraine. Objective The objective of this article is to determine the efficacy of ONB with local anesthetic and corticosteroid for the preventive treatment of migraine. Participants and methods Patients between 18 and 75 years old with ICHD-II-defined episodic (> 1 attack per week) or chronic migraine (modified ICHD-II as patients with > 10 days with consumption of acute medications were permitted into the study) were randomized to receive either 2.5 ml 0.5% bupivacaine plus 0.5 ml (20 mg) methylprednisolone over the ipsilateral (unilateral headache) or bilateral (bilateral headache) ON or 2.75 ml normal saline plus 0.25 ml 1% lidocaine without epinephrine (placebo). Patients completed a one-month headache diary prior to and after the double-blind injection. The primary outcome measure was defined as a 50% or greater reduction in the frequency of days with moderate or severe migraine headache in the four-week post-injection compared to the four-week pre-injection baseline period. Results Thirty-four patients received active and 35 patients received placebo treatment. Because of missing data, the full analysis of 33 patients in the active and 30 patients in the placebo group was analyzed for efficacy. In the active and placebo groups respectively, the mean frequency of at least moderate (mean 9.8 versus 9.5) and severe (3.6 versus 4.3) migraine days and acute medication days (7.9 versus 10.0) were not substantially different at baseline. The percentage of patients with at least a 50% reduction in the frequency of moderate or severe headache days was 30% for both groups (10/30 vs nine of 30, Δ 0.00, 95% CI –0.22 to 0.23). Conclusions Greater ONB does not reduce the frequency of moderate to severe migraine days in patients with episodic or chronic migraine compared to placebo. The study was registered with ClinicalTrial.gov (NCT00915473).


2001 ◽  
Vol 101 (6) ◽  
pp. 573-580 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris J. LANGENBERG ◽  
Henk G. PIETERSEN ◽  
Gijs GESKES ◽  
Anton J.M. WAGENMAKERS ◽  
Simon DE LANGE ◽  
...  

In a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study, the effects of intravenous glutamate infusion on myocardial haemodynamics and metabolism were studied in 22 patients undergoing routine coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Immediately after aortic cross-clamp release, an intravenous infusion of a solution of glutamate (125mmolċl-1) at a rate of 1.5mlċh-1ċkg-1 was given over 1h to 11 patients (G group). The other 11 patients received a placebo infusion (0.9% NaCl) (P group). Haemodynamic functions and rates of exchange of glucose, non-esterified fatty acids and lactic acid over the heart were measured before sternotomy (T1), 40min after cross-clamp release (T2) and 4h after cross-clamp release (T3). At T2, decreases were seen in comparison with T1 in systemic vascular resistance index, and increases were seen in cardiac index and coronary sinus flow. All of these changes were greater in the G group than in the P group (P < 0.05). Myocardial glutamate consumption increased 2-fold after glutamate administration. No significant changes were observed in the myocardial utilization of glucose, lactate or non-esterified fatty acids between the P and the G groups at T1, T2 or T3. These data show that an intravenous glutamate infusion after routine CABG surgery significantly improved cardiac haemodynamic performance without direct effects on cardiac substrate metabolism. This suggests that a reduction of the afterload via a peripheral vasodilatory effect is the main mechanism leading to the observed changes in haemodynamics. Earlier claims that patients with post-operative cardiac failure show metabolic benefits from the glutamate infusion do not seem to apply to patients undergoing routine CABG surgery.


2019 ◽  
Vol 237 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-82
Author(s):  
Lotfi Khemiri ◽  
Pia Steensland ◽  
Joar Guterstam ◽  
Örjan de Manzano ◽  
Johan Franck ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Alcohol dependence (AD) is associated with a dysregulated mesolimbocortical dopamine system—a pathway which is also implicated in both reward and cognition. The monoamine stabilizer (-)-OSU6162 (OSU) is a novel pharmacological compound with the ability to reduce ethanol intake and ethanol seeking in long-term drinking rats as well as reducing alcohol craving in AD patients. Dopaminergic drugs can both impair and improve cognitive functions, and the aim of the current study was to investigate the effect of OSU treatment on cognitive functioning in AD patients. Method In a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study, 56 individuals with AD received 14 days of OSU or placebo treatment. Neuropsychological tasks from the Cambridge Automated Neuropsychological Test Battery (CANTAB®) and other tasks were used to evaluate treatment effect on executive function/impulsivity, working memory, attention, emotional recognition, and divergent thinking. Results Treatment with OSU did not impair neuropsychological function in any of the cognitive domains investigated (all p > 0.1). In fact, OSU treatment did, compared to placebo, improve future planning ability (F(1,46) = 6.9; p = 0.012; Cohen’s d = 0.54), verbal divergent thinking (F(1,44) = 10.1; p = 0.003; d = 0.96), and response time for emotional recognition (F(1,47) = 6.7; p = 0.013; d = 0.44). Conclusion OSU treatment did not cause short-term cognitive side effects, further supporting the potential of OSU as a clinically feasible pharmacological treatment in AD patients. OSU treatment might improve future planning, verbal divergent thinking, and emotional recognition latency, which in turn may have a beneficial impact on alcohol use outcomes. Future studies are needed to confirm these preliminary findings.


2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ru-Lan Hsieh ◽  
Wei-Cheng Liao ◽  
Wen-Chung Lee

Infrared (IR) therapy is used for pain relief in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). However, IR’s effects on the cardiovascular system remain uncertain. Therefore, we investigated the local and systemic cardiovascular effects of monochromatic IR therapy on patients with knee OA in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Seventy-one subjects with knee OA received one session of 40 min of active or placebo monochromatic IR treatment (with power output of 6.24 W, wavelength of 890 nm, power density of 34.7 mW/cm2for 40 min, total energy of 41.6 J/cm2per knee per session) over the knee joints. Heart rate, blood pressure, and knee arterial blood flow velocity were periodically assessed at the baseline, during, and after treatment. Data were analyzed by repeated-measure analysis of covariance. Compared to baseline, there were no statistically significant group x time interaction effects between the 2 groups for heart rate (P=0.160), blood pressure (systolic blood pressure:P=0.861; diastolic blood pressure:P=0.757), or mean arterial blood flow velocity (P=0.769) in follow-up assessments. The present study revealed that although there was no increase of knee arterial blood flow velocity, monochromatic IR therapy produced no detrimental systemic cardiovascular effects.


2018 ◽  
Vol 78 (2) ◽  
pp. 179-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danielle M Gerlag ◽  
Mary Safy ◽  
Karen I Maijer ◽  
Man Wai Tang ◽  
Sander W Tas ◽  
...  

ObjectivesWe explored the effects of B-cell directed therapy in subjects at risk of developing autoantibodypositive rheumatoid arthritis (RA), who never experienced inflammatory arthritis before, and explored biomarkers predictive of arthritis development.MethodsIndividuals positive for both anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies and rheumatoid factor but without arthritis were included in a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to receive a single infusion of 1000 mg rituximab or placebo.ResultsEighty-one individuals received treatment and were followed up for a mean of 29.0 (0–54) months, during which 30/81 (37%) individuals developed arthritis. The observed risk of developing arthritis in the placebo-treated group was 40%, which was decreased by 55% (HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.154 to 1.322) in the rituximab-treated group at 12 months. Rituximab treatment caused a delay in arthritis development of 12 months compared with placebo treatment at the point when 25% of the subjects had developed arthritis (p<0.0001). Erythrocyte sedimentation rate and the presence of anti-citrullinated α-enolase peptide 1 at baseline were significant predictors of arthritis development.ConclusionsA single infusion of 1000 mg rituximab significantly delays the development of arthritis in subjects at risk of developing RA, providing evidence for the pathogenetic role of B cells in the earliest, prearthritis stage of autoantibody positive RA.


2003 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 156-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danilo Antonio Baltieri ◽  
Arthur Guerra de Andrade

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and security of acamprosate in the treatment of 75 men, aged 18 to 59 years, with diagnosis of alcohol dependence according to the ICD-10. METHODS: Double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 24-week long. After a one-week detoxification period, patients were randomly divided in two groups: the first group received acamprosate (six tablets of 333 mg/d for 12 weeks) and the second group received placebo (six tablets for 12 weeks). After the first 12 weeks, patients continued the follow-up for further 12 weeks without medication. RESULTS: Patients who were receiving acamprosate showed significantly higher continuous abstinence time within the 24 weeks of treatment compared with patients who were assigned to placebo treatment (p=.017). Twenty-five percent of patients who were receiving acamprosate and 20% of the placebo-treated patients dropped out. Few side-effects were reported in both groups. CONCLUSION: Acamprosate proved to be safe and effective in treating alcohol-dependent patients and to maintain the abstinence during 24 weeks.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Ahmed A. Sadek ◽  
Mokhtar Mostafa ◽  
Tarek Abdel-Monem

Background and Objectives: The success of functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) depends on the visual clarity of the surgical field, which is understudied. Controlled hypotension has many advantages for FESS including reduction in blood loss and improved quality of the surgical field. This study determined whether the use of β-blockers as a premedication could improve the operative field in FESS. Methods: Sixty patients aged from 18 to 50 years, undergoing septoplasty and FESS were included in this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either metoprolol (100 mg, group 1) or a placebo (a vitamin tablet, group 2) 60 min before surgery. Results: The average blood loss and surgery duration were not significantly higher in the placebo group. The surgical field was graded using the Fromme-Boezaart scale, and it was significantly clearer (p < 0.001) in metoprolol group. The mean arterial blood pressure was significantly lower in the metoprolol group after 30 min of induction until the end of surgery (p < 0.001). The heart rate was also significantly lower (p < 0.001) in those who received metoprolol from before induction of anesthesia up to the end of surgery. Conclusion: Metoprolol significantly improves visual clarity and hemodynamics during FESS. We would recommend the use of metoprolol in FESS and septoplasty.


VASA ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Al-Awami ◽  
Schillinger ◽  
Maca ◽  
Pollanz ◽  
Minar

Background: We recently performed a pilot study which suggested that clinical and thermographic improvements occurred in patients with primary and secondary Raynaud’s phenomenon (RP) following treatment with low level laser irradiation (LLLI). In view of these findings, we have proceeded with a double blind, placebo-controlled study. Methods: Forty seven patients suffering from primary or secondary RP were randomly assigned in a double-blind manner to receive either 10 sessions of distant LLLI (16 f, 8 m, median age 45 years) or placebo irradiation (21 f, 2 m, median age 46 years) during winter months. The attack frequency of RP was measured by a diary count; its severity was assessed by means of visual analogue scale. Response to cold challenge test before and after LLL or placebo treatment was assessed by infrared thermography. Result: Overall a significant reduction of the frequency as well as the severity of RP in patients with either LLLI (frequency p < 0.0001, severity p < 0.0001) or placebo treatment (frequency p < 0.0001, severity p = 0.02) was found, but patients in the LLLI group exhibited a statistically more significant improvement of the frequency at 6 weeks p = 0.007 and 3 months p = 0.02 and the severity p = 0.02, p = 0.04 of RP. Thermographic response to cold challenge improved only in patients treated with LLL but not in those treated with placebo. Conclusion: LLLI significantly lowers the frequency and severity of Raynaud’s attacks in patients with primary and secondary RP. Since this therapeutic modality is a safe, and non-invasive treatment, it might be considered as an alternative to existing therapeutic regimes.


1994 ◽  
Vol 83 (03) ◽  
pp. 132-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Jeulin ◽  
P. Peycru ◽  
C. Amengual ◽  
C. Gaucher

AbstractA pilot study of homoeopathic treatment of cholera during an epidemic in Peru appeared to show that it was effective. A subsequent double blind study showed no difference betwen active homoeopathic treatment and placebo treatment. Various technical problems were encountered.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document