Post Prandial Changes in Portal Venous Pressure in Cirrhotic and Non-Cirrhotic Patients with Portal Hypertension

1986 ◽  
Vol 71 (s15) ◽  
pp. 1P-2P
Author(s):  
P.A. McCormick ◽  
J.E. Hegarty
Keyword(s):  
Portal Hypertension ◽  
Venous Pressure ◽  
Portal Venous Pressure ◽  
Cirrhotic Patients

Octreotide inhibits the meal-induced increases in the portal venous pressure of cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension: A double-blind, placebo-controlled study

Hepatology ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 1180-1186 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Aiden McCormick ◽  
Maria Rosa Biagini ◽  
Robert Dick ◽  
Lynda Greenslade ◽  
Jason Chin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Portal Hypertension ◽  
Venous Pressure ◽  
Portal Venous Pressure ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo ◽  
Cirrhotic Patients

scholarly journals The study of hepatic hemodynamics: research activity or clinical tool?

2013 ◽  
pp. 201-206
Author(s):  
Claudio Puoti ◽  
Lia Bellis
Keyword(s):  
Portal Hypertension ◽  
Venous Pressure ◽  
Preoperative Assessment ◽  
Clinical Tool ◽  
Research Activity ◽  
Acute Variceal Bleeding ◽  
Routine Work ◽  
Hepatic Hemodynamics ◽  
Pros And Cons ◽  
Cirrhotic Patients

Portal hypertension is a progressive complication of cirrhosis. Therefore, the management of a patient with cirrhosis and gastrointestinal bleeding depends largely on the stage of the portal hypertension. The patient may be in the pre-variceal stage or present with acute variceal bleeding, in which case the objectives are to control the current hemorrhage and prevent recurrence. In clinical practice, the severity of portal hypertension can be estimated, reliably and safely, by transjugular measurement of the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG). After a brief review of the pathophysiology of portal hypertension in cirrhosis, the authors describe the technique used to measure transjugular HVPG, its prognostic value in patients with cirrhosis, the pros and cons of including this procedure in routine work-ups of these patients, and its potential roles in monitoring responses to treatment and in the preoperative assessment of cirrhotic patients undergoing hepatic resection.

Effect of portal hypertension on splenic blood flow, intrasplenic extravasation and systemic blood pressure

2003 ◽  
Vol 284 (6) ◽  
pp. R1580-R1585 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Kaufman ◽  
Jody Levasseur
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Blood Flow ◽  
Portal Hypertension ◽  
Portal Vein ◽  
Venous Pressure ◽  
Splenic Vein ◽  
Systemic Blood Pressure ◽  
Portal Venous Pressure ◽  
Systemic Blood ◽  
Fluid Extravasation

We have previously shown that intrasplenic fluid extravasation is important in controlling blood volume. We proposed that, because the splenic vein flows in the portal vein, portal hypertension would increase splenic venous pressure and thus increase intrasplenic microvascular pressure and fluid extravasation. Given that the rat spleen has no capacity to store/release blood, intrasplenic fluid extravasation can be estimated by measuring the difference between splenic arterial inflow and venous outflow. In anesthetized rats, partial ligation of the portal vein rostral to the junction with the splenic vein caused portal venous pressure to rise from 4.5 ± 0.5 to 12.0 ± 0.9 mmHg ( n = 6); there was no change in portal venous pressure downstream of the ligation, although blood flow in the liver fell. Splenic arterial flow did not change, but the arteriovenous flow differential increased from 0.8 ± 0.3 to 1.2 ± 0.1 ml/min ( n = 6), and splenic venous hematocrit rose. Mean arterial pressure fell (101 ± 5.5 to 95 ± 4 mmHg). Splenic afferent nerve activity increased (5.6 ± 0.9 to 16.2 ± 0.7 spikes/s, n = 5). Contrary to our hypothesis, partial ligation of the portal vein caudal to the junction with the splenic vein (same increase in portal venous pressure but no increase in splenic venous pressure) also caused the splenic arteriovenous flow differential to increase (0.6 ± 0.1 to 1.0 ± 0.2 ml/min; n = 8). The increase in intrasplenic fluid efflux and the fall in mean arterial pressure after rostral portal vein ligation were abolished by splenic denervation. We propose there to be an intestinal/hepatic/splenic reflex pathway, through which is mediated the changes in intrasplenic extravasation and systemic blood pressure observed during portal hypertension.

Effects of endothelin in portal hypertensive rats

1992 ◽  
Vol 83 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pi-Chin Yu ◽  
Jon-Son Kuo ◽  
Han-Chieh Lin ◽  
May C. M. Yang
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Portal Hypertension ◽  
Portal Vein ◽  
Venous Pressure ◽  
Portal Venous Pressure ◽  
Portal Vein Ligation ◽  
Sprague Dawley ◽  
Hypertensive Rats ◽  
Endothelin 1 ◽  
Sprague Dawley Rats

1. Effects of endothelin-1 on systemic arterial blood pressure, heart rate and portal venous pressure were compared in normal Sprague-Dawley rats and rats with portal hypertension induced by CCl4 and partial portal vein ligation. 2. Endothelin-1 produced biphasic effects on systemic blood pressure and portal venous pressure in all three groups of rats. However, the magnitude of the changes in blood pressure was less in portal hypertensive rats. 3. The ability of endothelin-1 to increase the portal venous pressure was also significantly diminished in portal hypertensive rats. On the other hand, the initial decrease in portal pressure was augmented in rats with partial portal vein ligation, and disappeared at higher dosage in CCl4-treated rats. 4. In accordance with the pressure recording in vivo, the dose-response vasoconstrictive activity of endothelin-1 was significantly attenuated in the intrahepatic vasculature. 5. The plasma immunoreactive endothelin concentration was significantly higher (5.55 ± 0.81 fmol/ml) in Sprague-Dawley rats than in CCl4-treated rats (2.83 ± 0.56 fmol/ml) and rats with partial portal vein ligation (2.68 ± 0.53 fmol/ml). 6. It was concluded that a lower plasma level of endothelin and a reduced vascular responsiveness may contribute, at least in part, to the hyperdynamics of portal hypertension.

scholarly journals Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and portal hypertension

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 149-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marvin Ryou ◽  
Nicholas Stylopoulos ◽  
Gyorgy Baffy
Keyword(s):  
Portal Hypertension ◽  
Liver Disease ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Fatty Liver ◽  
Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease ◽  
Fatty Liver Disease ◽  
Venous Pressure ◽  
Portal Venous Pressure ◽  
Invasive Technique ◽  
Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a substantial and growing problem worldwide and has become the second most common indication for liver transplantation as it may progress to cirrhosis and develop complications from portal hypertension primarily caused by advanced fibrosis and erratic tissue remodeling. However, elevated portal venous pressure has also been detected in experimental models of fatty liver and in human NAFLD when fibrosis is far less advanced and cirrhosis is absent. Early increases in intrahepatic vascular resistance may contribute to the progression of liver disease. Specific pathophenotypes linked to the development of portal hypertension in NAFLD include hepatocellular lipid accumulation and ballooning injury, capillarization of liver sinusoidal endothelial cells, enhanced contractility of hepatic stellate cells, activation of Kupffer cells and pro-inflammatory pathways, adhesion and entrapment of recruited leukocytes, microthrombosis, angiogenesis and perisinusoidal fibrosis. These pathological events are amplified in NAFLD by concomitant visceral obesity, insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes and dysbiosis, promoting aberrant interactions with adipose tissue, skeletal muscle and gut microbiota. Measurement of the hepatic venous pressure gradient by retrograde insertion of a balloon-tipped central vein catheter is the current reference method for predicting outcomes of cirrhosis associated with clinically significant portal hypertension and guiding interventions. This invasive technique is rarely considered in the absence of cirrhosis where currently available clinical, imaging and laboratory correlates of portal hypertension may not reflect early changes in liver hemodynamics. Availability of less invasive but sufficiently sensitive methods for the assessment of portal venous pressure in NAFLD remains therefore an unmet need. Recent efforts to develop new biomarkers and endoscopy-based approaches such as endoscopic ultrasound-guided measurement of portal pressure gradient may help achieve this goal. In addition, cellular and molecular targets are being identified to guide emerging therapies in the prevention and management of portal hypertension.

Vasopressin and portal venous pressure in portal hypertensive cirrhotic patients

1978 ◽  
Vol 74 (5) ◽  
pp. 1162
Author(s):  
M.H. Howard ◽  
C.M. Leevy ◽  
J.M. Rocko ◽  
K.G. Swan
Keyword(s):  
Venous Pressure ◽  
Portal Venous Pressure ◽  
Cirrhotic Patients

Portal venous pressure and portasystemic shunting in experimental portal hypertension

1989 ◽  
Vol 257 (1) ◽  
pp. G52-G57 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. G. Geraghty ◽  
W. J. Angerson ◽  
D. C. Carter
Keyword(s):  
Portal Hypertension ◽  
Portal Vein ◽  
Venous Pressure ◽  
Portal Pressure ◽  
Rapid Change ◽  
Quadratic Function ◽  
Portal Venous Pressure ◽  
Portal Vein Ligation ◽  
Strong Positive Correlation ◽  
The Relationship

The relationship between portal venous pressure and the degree of portasystemic shunting was studied in portal vein-ligated and cirrhotic rats anesthetized with halothane. One day after partial portal vein ligation there was a strong positive correlation (r = 0.80, n = 7) between portal pressure and shunting of mesenteric venous blood as measured by injection of radioactive microspheres. The relationship subsequently underwent rapid change but stabilized by 14 days postligation, when higher levels of shunting were again associated with higher portal pressures up to a limit of approximately 70% shunting, above which pressures did not increase further. This relationship was well described by a quadratic function (r = 0.75, n = 17). In cirrhotic rats there was no relationship between portal pressure and shunting (r = -0.01, n = 10). The results suggest that in the prehepatic model there is little inherent variability in capacity to develop shunts, which open to a degree directly related to portal pressure, but that this relationship may be altered in cirrhotic portal hypertension.

scholarly journals The relationship between intrahepatic portal systemic shunts and microsphere induced portal hypertension in the rat liver

Gut ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 276-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
X Li ◽  
I S Benjamin ◽  
B Alexander
Keyword(s):  
Blood Flow ◽  
Portal Hypertension ◽  
Steady State ◽  
Portal Vein ◽  
Rat Liver ◽  
Venous Pressure ◽  
Portal Venous Pressure ◽  
Portal Vein Ligation ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Wedged Hepatic Venous Pressure

Background—Portal hypertension is associated with gross haemodynamic disturbances characterised by high cardiac output, low peripheral vascular resistance, increased splanchnic blood flow, and portal systemic shunting.Aims—To study the relationship between intrahepatic portal systemic shunts and microsphere induced portal hypertension in the rat liver.Methods—Different sized microspheres were sequentially injected into the portal vein of male Wistar rats.Results—Steady state portal venous pressure was increased by 102.2 (35.6)% (14.9 (3.6) mm Hg) and 272.3 (78.0)% (24.0 (2.2) mm Hg) above the basal pressure following sequential injections of 15 and 80 μm diameter microspheres, respectively. Sequential injection of 15, 40, and 80 μm diameter microspheres in either ascending or descending order of size did not generate further increases in portal venous pressure. A single injection of 1.8 × 105 80 μm microspheres consistently produced a steady state portal venous pressure of 19.0 (1.3) mm Hg but did not approach the much higher value of 36.6 (43.2) mm Hg measured during clamping of the portal vein. These data indicate that the opening of patent intrahepatic shunts was responsible for the reduced pressures observed during microsphere injections and further evidence for this was provided by the location of microspheres in the pulmonary vascular bed. The elevation in portal venous pressure achieved by microsphere injections was not significantly different to that produced in rats subjected to partial portal vein ligation (20.7 (0.5) mm Hg, p>0.05). Wedged hepatic venous pressure decreased from 6.7 (0.7) to 3.0 (0.6) mm Hg following injection of 80 μm microspheres, suggesting a decrease in total hepatic blood flow. Conversely, injection of 15 μm microspheres induced an increase in wedged hepatic venous pressure from 7.0 (1.0) mm Hg to 12.4 (1.8) mm Hg, indicating a localised redistribution of blood flow at the presinusoidal level of the portal venous vascular network and increased intrahepatic shunt flow.Conclusion—It is suggested that there may be a protective pathophysiological role for these shunts when the liver is subjected to changes which induce acute portal hypertension.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document